Bacon84

quote:

---

I think DeBoer is a lot like Dabo

---

Washed up and behind the times?

Clinging to the past? (Not his past, but Bama’s)

quote:

---

2027 GMC Sierra 1500 revealed

---

I love the way they look. However, I am just not all about these new vehicles that you can't work on. They have essentially made it so that you have to go to the dealer to work on stuff. independent shops have to pay a handsome fee to have access and even be able to access the codes, clear them, etc...

add to it, that I cannot stand all the new "safety" features, and self drive, modes, etc...

I'm really leaning to buying an old 90s model and just drop some cash to rebuild it when it needs it.... sooner or later you won't be able to get parts, I know...

oh yea.... STAY OFF MY LAWN>

I believe you have read this slightly incorrectly..

The game between WV and UNC was the 3rd most watched PRE-finals game ever. (what games are 1 and 2?)

and the june 22nd game was the most watched of the season.

24% increase YOY, means the average of 1.5M viewers is up 24% vs last year's average viewer numbers.

quote:

---

The premise of the article is comparing how well coaches did in the offseason. Of course it is just an article to drive discussion and has no actual effect on the play. But for the sake of discussion, it is a poorly premised opinion. Golding didn't actually do anything to retain Chambliss. The NCAA ruled him ineligible. It was a Mississippi judge who "retained" Chambliss. Crediting the HC for something he didn't actually do is misplaced credit.

As to roster construction, it seems a bit illogical to say the guy who signed the #2 transfer class and #22 HS signing class did a "better" job on that basis than the guy who signed the #1 transfer and #11 HS signing class. But that is an argument cited by the author. So what exactly did Golden, PERSONALLY, do better than Kiffin?

Hell, the only notable thing he did was poorly tamper with a (then) Clemson student/player, causing him to be called out on it. His only rebuttal was "everyone else is doing it and I'm gonna tell if you don't stop talking about it." Of course, the NCAA knows tampering is rampant. But this bozo was so bad at it in his first try that he may eventually get sanctions in a climate were pretty much no one gets sanctions anymore

---

I dont necessarily disagree with you... I just don't care what the media says. frick em

quote:

---

If Chambliss is the reason for the A+, then shouldn't we be giving credit to the MS judge who allowed him to play, not Pete? Semantics aside, Chambliss and Lacy did have great seasons last year. But aren't there a few guys who were a big part of that success who are no longer at Ole Miss? Like the HC (playcaller), OC, RB, WR, TE coaches...otherwise known as basically the entire Ole Miss offensive staff? It seems like a lot to attribute the great play of two guys who never achieved that level of success prior, strictly to the players and not the coaches who directed it. But, Ole Miss had the #2 transfer class and a "top 25" HS signing class. That's great!...until you compare it to a guy who "didn't quite have the same level of offseason success

---

Who..... CAREs?


let Pete have his 20 mins of glory.
the article is about roster construction, not how well they will play on the field. Ole Miss retained a Lot of their offense. They will no doubt have talent.

They will obviously try to change as little of the offensive scheme as possible... GREAT! it's Lane's scheme, He knows the players and he knows what scheme they will try to recreate... and he will know how to exploit the weaknesses.

Our D should be ready....

What Our coaching staff needs to be doing, is playing the media game... "Man, Ole Miss is great! They have great players! it's gonna be a tall ask to beat them.".... Praise them all off season...
then crush them on the field.

what the media writes does not matter in the least...

the retardation of PETA is not New.
It is only outdone by the retardation of Pro-Choice movement.

It's not a coincidence that both groups have many of the same members.

First of all, make the mold yourself?
Baw, I’m impressed. That’s intricate work I could not pull off by hand.

I am not aware of any sort of rule you’d be breaking. In fact, there is no requirement to have that central saint medal at all. It could simply be a ring that joins the parts of the rosary.

It is important to remember that a rosary is simply a tool to help count while SAYING the rosary prayer.
It is not a talisman, or lucky rabbit’s foot. The physical rosary has not extraordinary power in itself, although faithfully saying the rosary does have power.

A rosary is a sacramental. It is (should be) blessed and set apart for a holy purpose, but the rosary itself has no particular power.

Same can be said of any saint medal whether it is part of a rosary or otherwise.

Hopefully this helps!

Both of you are running to the internet separately to ask opinions, hoping to have your opinion supported so you can point to these Internet opinions for support of your argument.

If you are running to the internet instead of sitting down and talking it out, you (both of you) are too immature to have a relationship.

Period.

quote:

---

. Government messages warned parents not to leave children unattended in cars.

---

If the government needs to warn them of this they don’t need to be parents.

quote:

---

have no idea what a mean girl is, but I'm not seeing any reason to argue with your thread title OP. Hot damn.

---

Same. I have no idea what the other mean girls look like…. But this one is hot