Started By
Message
re: SEC cites "no firsthand evidence" of LSU wrongdoing in filing
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:18 am to Cell of Awareness
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:18 am to Cell of Awareness
Ignoring that reads like a Rant post in article form, and was published at TigerRag.com -
Hearings are held for the presentation of evidence, it is not the purpose of a complaint.
Is the plaintiff now on the hook to prove the allegations? Absolutely, or the injunction/suit gets tossed.
But you cant scream no evidence provided based on a complaint before a hearing ever happens.
Hearings are held for the presentation of evidence, it is not the purpose of a complaint.
Is the plaintiff now on the hook to prove the allegations? Absolutely, or the injunction/suit gets tossed.
But you cant scream no evidence provided based on a complaint before a hearing ever happens.
2
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:20 am to SlicedBread
quote:
Ignoring that reads like a Rant post in article form, and was published at TigerRag.com - Hearings are held for the presentation of evidence, it is not the purpose of a complaint. Is the plaintiff now on the hook to prove the allegations? Absolutely, or the injunction/suit gets tossed. But you cant scream no evidence provided based on a complaint before a hearing ever happens.
When the SEC gets up and says, “Well, Joe Blow SAYS they totally did it!” they will have their lawsuit tossed.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:20 am to SidewalkTiger
Penn State had the admin/HC covering for a child rapist and kept him on the payroll. They never brought it to a vote to kick them out. So much evidence, no vote.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:21 am to SidewalkTiger
I stated this in my post. How does Sankey know anything? The federal case appears to be based on nothing more than hurt feelings
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:21 am to RB10
Quite possibly. But the subtext of that "article" is just homer BS.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:22 am to SidewalkTiger
So this is all just bullshite according to this... FML
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:24 am to SlicedBread
quote:
Quite possibly. But the subtext of that "article" is just homer BS.
As opposed to the subtext of all the articles the SEC cited in their lawsuit being what? Gospel truth?
The SEC is about to get their dick knocked in the dirt in a court of law for the 2nd time in a week.
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 11:25 am
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:24 am to SidewalkTiger
Can we get this stickied?
SEC admits they have nothing and are full of horseshite...
Exactly what I and others have been saying.
SEC admits they have nothing and are full of horseshite...
Exactly what I and others have been saying.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:25 am to SidewalkTiger
man you know something is insane when fricking Gilbeau is white knighting for LSU 
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:26 am to SlicedBread
quote:
the subtext of that "article" is just homer BS
My previous post was not a joke. No one hates LSU more than Glenn Guilbeau. He is not an LSU homer by any means. I am actually surprised that he would post anything that can be even considered possible good news for LSU.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:27 am to NussBusDriver
quote:
This is true. Glenn will take any chance to hammer LSU if he can.
To the point that tiger fans are chastised for linking his articles
Its more shocking this tweet came from guilbeau than the information in the tweet itself
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:28 am to Marlboro Smooth
quote:
Kicking LSU out is still the correct thing to do
Go home, it's not basketball season yet.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:28 am to TigerLunatik
Fair, but he didn't write the article,.just retweeted it.
I am addressing the substance of the article.
I am addressing the substance of the article.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:29 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
SEC cites "no firsthand evidence" of LSU wrongdoing in filing
So they have secondhand evidence.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:30 am to Marlboro Smooth
Do it
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:30 am to TideSaint
quote:
So they have secondhand evidence.
There’s a word for that
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:31 am to TideSaint
quote:
So they have secondhand evidence.
Seemingly a news report that cites "anonymous sources".
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:33 am to SidewalkTiger
But . . . but . . Ole Missed fans on this very site have assured me that there are texts showing Lane's involvement. Why would they post such inflammatory nonsense with nothing to back it up?
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:33 am to SidewalkTiger
Key word there is "firsthand". Like LSU and/or the player would just offer up an admission of guilt out of the kindness of their heart. Just because the SEC doesn't have "firsthand evidence" doesn't mean that they aren't 100% sure that LSU did it.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:35 am to Bamatab
quote:
Key word there is "firsthand". Like LSU and/or the player would just offer up an admission of guilt out of the kindness of their heart. Just because the SEC doesn't have "firsthand evidence" doesn't mean that they aren't 100% sure that LSU did it.
The "evidence" they cited are CBS reports and Twitter posts.
This is Bountygate all over again.
Page 2 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News