
Bamatab
| Favorite team: | Alabama |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 16341 |
| Registered on: | 1/22/2013 |
| Online Status: | Online |
Recent Posts
Message
quote:
Cox's wife, Jordan, played by Christa Miller, did those silicon lips and other work done, which is distracting.
Did you not see her in the last couple of seasons of the original run? That plastic surgery work wasn't done recently.
re: SEC POWER RANKINGS
Posted by Bamatab on 10/4/26 at 11:36 am to geauxbrown
quote:
While I’m still not sure about the passing game

quote:
but there is no planet where this bama team puts up 45 against this georgia team.
I don't think they will, but to say there's no planet is ludicrous.
re: #1 in the country Alabama or Georgia?
Posted by Bamatab on 10/3/26 at 3:43 pm to Cheese Grits
We'll find out soon enough
re: Bamas going undefeated
Posted by Bamatab on 10/3/26 at 3:32 pm to The Winner
quote:
That QB is Jalen Hurts 2.0

re: Alabama is Going to Rape Georgia Next Week
Posted by Bamatab on 10/3/26 at 3:05 pm to FireDanMullen
Yeah, UGA ain't getting raped by anyone. Bama seems to have a team that can win it if they play a mistake free football, but that is a tall order.
I will be interested in what the line for the game ends up being by kickoff.
I will be interested in what the line for the game ends up being by kickoff.
re: The DC Studios series Lanterns premieres today, August 16, 2026, at 9:00 p.e. ET.
Posted by Bamatab on 9/29/26 at 10:05 am to hiltacular
I now think that Hal made a clone of himself using the manhunter's technology immediately after John shot the manhunter, and it was the clone that went to prison while the real Hal freed Sinestro and set up everything. I also think it was most likely Hal that shot his clone as part of his "master plan" and the real Hal is still alive. It would explain why John's mother said that Hal wanted to apologize and yet the Hal that John met at the cafe didn't seem to know what he was talking about. Hal definitely is the one that broke Sinestro out of prison, yet I don't see how he could have done it if he was also in prison unless we are to believe that he somehow snuck that wormhole thing into prison with him.
re: ‘Star Wars’: Jon Watts to Direct Episode 10
Posted by Bamatab on 9/27/26 at 9:24 am to GeauxLaneTrain
quote:
Rey declared herself one
Do the people not understand that she has verbally declared that she now identifies as a Skywalker? That most certainly trumps actual hereditary genes. And anyone that says otherwise is a bigot and a racist...somehow.
But seriously it's just stupid to call this next series of movies a Skywalker saga. Not only because she is a Palpatine (or some variation of one) and not a Skywalker, but the last trilogy of SW movies that she starred in effectively killed the whole aura of the Skywalkers. I doubt that the majority of people that grew up with the Skwalkers, and Luke & Vader in particular, care what happens after the debacle that was that last trilogy. They'd be far better off declaring the last trilogy a fever dream by Luke that never actually happened and just start over from there.
That would actually make the most sense on how she found out everything about Joe.
But with that said, I will also add that people thinking there just has to be a mole are forgetting who's show this is. How many plot points were just either glossed over or out right forgotten in Yellowstone? It wouldn't shock me if the never address how they found out about Joe or her whereabouts.
But with that said, I will also add that people thinking there just has to be a mole are forgetting who's show this is. How many plot points were just either glossed over or out right forgotten in Yellowstone? It wouldn't shock me if the never address how they found out about Joe or her whereabouts.
quote:
If Edwick and Susie don't hook up by the end of this show I'm going to be pissed.
They will either end up together or kill each other, I don't see an in-between with those two.
quote:
I thought Jo said detain.
I'm pretty sure that Joe said engage to Tex and the other guy, the NSA person said detain to Kyle.
quote:The big deal would be Russia coming after Joe on US soil, or the US going after a high level Russian agent on Russian soil. The same can be said for China, other European countries, Japan and countries like that.
They are making a big deal all season about people coming after Joe on American soil (at her home). Even in the finale, the Russian dude talks about how that’s against the rules (criminal behavior).
But the middle eastern countries is played with a whole other set of rules.
re: Lioness Season 3 Off to a Solid Start
Posted by Bamatab on 9/21/26 at 9:55 am to prplhze2000
quote:
Not surprised the family left her. Husband tired of being on a rollercoaster, he is tired of seeing his kids on a roller coaster. You could tell those kids were ready to move on. I think the final straw was when she returned but then put off going home. Revenge was more important than her family and they acted accordingly. Not much sympathy here for her.
They were kind of teasing this for most of the season where it seemed Jo was expecting her husband to reach his end but then he'd stick with her. So her diving off instead of going inside definitely felt like the straw that broke the camel's back. But my only issue was the speed in which he did it. She wasn't away but maybe a day or two from the time she drove off from the house until she finally returned (or at least that is the way it seemed), and yet the family had already packed everything up and got the house on the market. But I guess the writers had to make it that fast since it was the season finale.
quote:
Aliyah doesn't want Cruz. She recognizes she is a soldier following orders. She wants the woman who made it all happen. Very astute.
She told the guy that they had to get her out of the country instead of just killing her in the US so that they could get her whole team when they come after her. So I think she wants Cruz and everyone else involved with the Lioness program (at least the field operatives) just as much as she wants Jo.
quote:
Hated it for the Ukranian spy. They literally outsmarted themselves, so intent were they on nailing Ukraine. She didn't deserve her fate. All she did was help them.
I thought that was sloppy writing that didn't have to happen at all unless there is some sort of fallout from it down the line. First off there's no way that an intelligence agency is going to end a goldmine of Russian intelligence, including everything from operations knowledge to tactics, over a "hunch" that had absolutely no evidence to back it up. And unless there is some other fallout from it, I'm not sure what purpose killing her off actually serves except for making the CIA look like a paranoid organization that acts out of fear and not reality.
quote:
Nice seeing Jo f up again. In real world, no way she would have been allowed to run that op at the restaurant that close to her return. Too emotionally compromised and involved. And it showed, that's why her boss was so mad. Wonder why Kyle didn't give her up when he was on the hot seat.
There is absolutely no way they are letting her in the field after being kidnapped like that until after she passes some real psychological evaluations, much less giving her the power to order kill orders against the people that she thinks might be responsible. And Kyle has proven time and again that he has Jo's back and truly considers her a friend, and I'm not sure if she feels the same way based on her past interactions with him. Jo is not really that good of a person, especially when it comes to family and friends. But I could also see her sacrifice herself at the end of next season to save her team if/when they try to save her again as a way for the writers to "redeem" her.
re: Lioness Season 3 Off to a Solid Start
Posted by Bamatab on 9/14/26 at 4:08 pm to prplhze2000
I agree that there's no way they are running red lights when trying to be incognito driving a kidnap victim around. And I also agree that they wouldn't just wait in the car for the police backup to arrive and expect a kidnap victim, in the state she was in, not to look hella sus. I think they would've been better off just having the team find them in the house to begin with.
Another thing, they sure do seem to be awfully quick to jump to conclusions on what seems to be some extremely flimsy evidence. It went from them being convinced it was Russia, then it had to be Iran, and now Ukraine without having hardly any evidence (which they even stated). And now they want to flat out murder a double agent, that supplied them with the info to do serious damage to Russia's spy network in the US, all over a hunch with basically no evidence to back it up?
I'm going to assume that Joe is going to be the voice of reason here, but that would also be crazy seeing how she was just kidnapped & tortured and can't be in a very stable state of mind. I don't see how they would even let her come back to work until she's been cleared by a psychologist after everything she's been through.
Another thing, they sure do seem to be awfully quick to jump to conclusions on what seems to be some extremely flimsy evidence. It went from them being convinced it was Russia, then it had to be Iran, and now Ukraine without having hardly any evidence (which they even stated). And now they want to flat out murder a double agent, that supplied them with the info to do serious damage to Russia's spy network in the US, all over a hunch with basically no evidence to back it up?
I'm going to assume that Joe is going to be the voice of reason here, but that would also be crazy seeing how she was just kidnapped & tortured and can't be in a very stable state of mind. I don't see how they would even let her come back to work until she's been cleared by a psychologist after everything she's been through.
re: The DC Studios series Lanterns premieres today, August 16, 2026, at 9:00 p.e. ET.
Posted by Bamatab on 9/13/26 at 10:39 pm to vilma4prez
I just can’t get past how freaking easy it was to kill the manhunter. These things wiped out whole civilizations a lot more advanced than earth, yet it only took one regular rifle bullet to take it out? And I realize that they said that by taking the form of a human meant it could be killed like a human, but that just seems like lazy writing to me.
re: SEC cites "no firsthand evidence" of LSU wrongdoing in filing
Posted by Bamatab on 9/9/26 at 12:52 pm to lsufball19
quote:
If you read the bylaws, the commissioner has pretty unwavering and unilateral power to do whatever he/she wants. Really the only thing that requires a vote is to change bylaws and to expel a member. The commissioner can pretty much punish punish anyone at his own discretion otherwise, and the severity of the punishment is also at his own discretion.
Do you really think the commissioner would go against the will of the SEC presidents and risk getting replaced? Because that is what would happen if the commissioner punishing schools for no reason.
re: SEC cites "no firsthand evidence" of LSU wrongdoing in filing
Posted by Bamatab on 9/9/26 at 12:45 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
but I can't see a world where they'll ever be fully protected from any repercussions when/if they do so.
You might be right. I never said whether or not I believed that the SEC would win the court hearing today, I was just commenting on what I believe to be their motivations for the hearing. I guess we'll all find out soon enough what this federal court rules, and then the rulings on any subsequent appeals afterwards.
quote:
LSU has sued no one.
I didn't say they have...yet, but I'm sure the aren't going to take getting kicked out of the SEC lying down.
re: SEC cites "no firsthand evidence" of LSU wrongdoing in filing
Posted by Bamatab on 9/9/26 at 12:28 pm to SidewalkTiger
I think we are splitting hairs at this point. I said that I have no doubt that they are in court today because they want to be able to enforce their bylaws, one of which is they can vote any member out with 2/3 vote whenever they want, without having to go to court as a result over it, which includes LSU suing them over it (a bylaw that they agreed to btw).
I have also said that I don’t believe the SEC presidents actually intend on kick LSU out, they just want to make emphasize to every institution that it only takes 2/3 vote so everyone needs to be in lockstep with each other.
I have also said that I don’t believe the SEC presidents actually intend on kick LSU out, they just want to make emphasize to every institution that it only takes 2/3 vote so everyone needs to be in lockstep with each other.
re: SEC cites "no firsthand evidence" of LSU wrongdoing in filing
Posted by Bamatab on 9/9/26 at 12:14 pm to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Nah, they can vote anyone out at anytime for anything.
If that is the case then you tell me why they are in federal court today?
quote:
“We can’t provide any evidence that LSU broke any of our rules, but we want to kick them out anyway, and we want you to make sure they can’t sue us for it.”
I would be shocked if every other president and school administration wants to kick LSU out. I'd also be shocked if the Thursday vote isn't either canceled or they vote not to kick LSU out.
I think all they are hoping for is a federal court to rule that the can enforce their bylaws, and then hold the member institutions feet to the fire by holding the "2/3 to vote you out" bylaw over their heads so everyone stays in lockstep through this current time ok chaos in college athletics.
Popular
0












