Started By
Message
re: SDS says Ms St can win it all
Posted on 4/16/18 at 8:33 am to CapstoneGrad06
Posted on 4/16/18 at 8:33 am to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
But we have been told Mullen didn’t recruit.
Mullen recruited the defensive front seven extremely well, which is an area MS and Alabama both produce good talent. He struggled more recruiting the offensive side of the ball, particularly offensive line and wide receiver, which is kind of a mystery for an offensive coach.
0
Posted on 4/16/18 at 8:34 am to A. Dixon Your Face
quote:
If a service has a player as a 4*, then they are 4*. We aren't discussing the validity of each service.
This is why you use the composite score.
Posted on 4/16/18 at 8:46 am to Jjdoc
quote:
Anybody buying that?
Hell no
Posted on 4/16/18 at 8:49 am to Jjdoc
Straight to the ship. 15-0
Posted on 4/16/18 at 9:03 am to LSU Patrick
quote:
Ms St
+
quote:
LSU Patrick
=
Posted on 4/16/18 at 9:04 am to Jjdoc
quote:
Anybody buying that?
No. MSU will do well to win 7 games this year.
Posted on 4/16/18 at 9:15 am to ColoBama
Lol
SFA
KSU
ULL
Kentucky
Florida
1 of Auburn/LSU/TAMU
La Tech
Arkansas
Ole Miss
That’s 9 right there.
SFA
KSU
ULL
Kentucky
Florida
1 of Auburn/LSU/TAMU
La Tech
Arkansas
Ole Miss
That’s 9 right there.
Posted on 4/16/18 at 9:24 am to Rabern57
quote:
The DC makes a huge difference with 2 and 3*s.
Everyone can stop reading here
Posted on 4/16/18 at 9:36 am to rockiee
I don't thats the case at all at me st.
Posted on 4/16/18 at 9:38 am to Jjdoc
quote:
I don't thats the case at all at me st.
Maine State is full of 2*, especially on defense
Posted on 4/16/18 at 9:40 am to Jjdoc
quote:
MSU would be a favorite to win at least 9 and maybe 10 of those games if oddsmakers had to make lines today.
This guy would lose a casino a lot of money if he was setting the lines
This guy is more delusional than LSU fans who thought Coach YawYaw was the answer
This post was edited on 4/16/18 at 9:42 am
Posted on 4/16/18 at 9:41 am to Jjdoc
quote:
Anybody buying that?
Maybe if Mullen was still their HC
Posted on 4/16/18 at 9:48 am to coachcrisp
quote:I won't take the trouble to post you scores and stats from the last two contests between these two teams, because I'm sure you considered them in your expert analysis. And I'm fully aware that previous seasons aren't always an indicator of future games.
State will curb stomp Auburn and their defense could possibly embarrass them
But I am curious - on what factors are you basing your prediction, other than wishful thinking on your part?
This post was edited on 4/16/18 at 9:52 am
Posted on 4/16/18 at 9:48 am to A. Dixon Your Face
quote:
that is 23 players on the defensive side of the ball that were ranked four stars or higher by one service or another
After pulling all rankings from the 247 Composite rankings instead of cherry picking my ratings from different sources to enhance the argument (like you did), here is what these guys' rankings actually are.
Jeffrey Simmons - 5*
Jamal Peters - 4*
Leo Lewis - 4*
Willie Gay - 4*
Fletcher Adams - 4*
Kobe Jones - 4*
Marquiss Spencer - 4*
Chauncey Rivers - 4* (went to UGA, didn't make it and went JUCO, and now is at State)
Gerri Green - 4*
Marcus Murphey - 3*
Jaden Crumedy - 4* (hasn't played a down of football in college and was barely a 4*
Fabien Lovett - 3*
Tim Washington - 3*
Erroll Thompson - 3*
CJ Morgan Walker - 3*
Korey Charles - 3*
Jonathan Abram - 3* prospect out of high school and JUCO
Lee Autry - borderline 3* JUCO prospect and outside top 1000 overall 3* out of HS
Brian Cole - 4* out of HS, but 3* out of JUCO and transferred from Mich.
Tyler Williams - 3* and ranked 817, not even close to being a 4*
Aaron Odom - 3* and ranked 591, not that close to being a 4*
Aaron Brule - 3*
Tyler Dunning - 3*
So, out of the 23 players you listed as 4*, only 10 are actually 4* or above, 11 if you count Brian Cole, with some of the players not being remotely close to being a 4*. That's at the most 47.8% of the guys you listed.
Argue metrics and different recruiting sites all you want - 247 Composite is probably the most unbiased and widely accepted recruiting site. Also, it always seems like Rivals gives out way more 4* ratings than other sites.
This post was edited on 4/16/18 at 9:51 am
Posted on 4/16/18 at 9:50 am to RebelTheBear
Can you expect anything else from a Mississippi State Fan?
I figured this would be the case, I just didn't want to spend my time proving something I already knew
I figured this would be the case, I just didn't want to spend my time proving something I already knew
Posted on 4/16/18 at 9:51 am to Jjdoc
quote:
I don't thats the case at all at me st.
Agreed, why I said everyone should stop reading there because he doesn't know what he is talking about
Posted on 4/16/18 at 9:55 am to momentoftruth87
quote:
Can you expect anything else from a Mississippi State Fan? I figured this would be the case, I just didn't want to spend my time proving something I already knew
All he stated was that those players were ranked 4* by one service or another
quote:
23 players on the defensive side of the ball that were ranked four stars or higher by one service or another
Don't attack the guy who said
quote:
a huge difference with 2 and 3*s
'Crootin' nerds
Posted on 4/16/18 at 9:58 am to CapstoneGrad06
The “Mullen is average at recruiting” line isn’t fake news. In the 9 years that he was here, his best class was ranked #18. Moorhead will top Mullen’s highest ranked recruiting class in year 1. Let that sink in.
This post was edited on 4/16/18 at 10:00 am
Posted on 4/16/18 at 9:58 am to FearlessFreep
quote:Good question. I'm not sold on next year's Auburn team, although I believe y'all will have a potent defense. If State's coaching transition goes well, I believe that they'll be a sack of hell (barring mass injuries)...especially in Starkville...Y'all got a lot of holes to fill.
But I am curious - on what factors are you basing your prediction, other than wishful thinking on your part?
Posted on 4/16/18 at 10:03 am to momentoftruth87
quote:
Using different services takes the validity away from your argument that they were ranked the same way.
Not really.
There will always be 1 service who ranks a recruit higher than the other 2. This isn't right. Nor wrong. Just a reality.
Is a composite 4 star a more selective criteria? Absolutely. But sometimes, 1 site is more accurate on a given recruit. So the composite isn't any more valid than his point (that talent is on the defense).
Page 2 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News