| Favorite team: | Columbia  |
| Location: | Cali |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 55876 |
| Registered on: | 3/14/2016 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
No its not. It is that they are poorly ran. Some of them are using the system to escape the poor management
0
quote:
No, it's not.
It is. Its been your whole argument about Trump.
quote:
Income tax didn't exist until 1913. And even then it didn't apply to wages, only gains from investments. "Income" had a different meaning when those laws were passed.
Lol. Dude. You are all over the place. You stated the only tax should be tariffs. I pointed out it has never been that way and you run to a specific tax in time and ignore all the rest.
What you are selling is that due to taxes outside of tariffs, isnt conservative. Well , then we have never been conservative on this point.
quote:
doesn't change the fact Trump adding them is adding a tax on Americans.
So because its Trump, its different. You see, if that is any part of your argument about being or not being conservative, then we have never been conservative because we have always had them.
quote:
The petro dollar is a fact.
So is the banking cartel that took over the US economically in 1913 and needs the petro dollar in order to maintain a backing.
If you allow the socialists to be correct on an issue, it's your fault. However, I don't think that is the case because a central bank is a requirement for socialism as it's the main force when it comes to wealth distribution.
You are the one using their talking points.
quote:
has an actual platform. You mention Massie, who has nearly a 100% score on conservative issues.
Yet you can not seem to craft that argument.
quote:
This is all nonsense.
Conservatives aren't against tariffs, they are against new taxes. Tariffs are a tax and it's being used to help pay for the EXTREME amounts of government spending.
I am very much pro military. I am very much against using them to fight foreign wars for the benefit of a banking cartel and foreign nations. The best way to support the troops is to use them for defense and bring them home
Again... socialist talking points used. They literally want the USA out of the world. Why would that be? Its not hard to grasp that.
The question is why is a conservative using talking points that are meant to achieve a specific goal.
quote:
That's not how a conservative is defined.
Its how you defined it.
quote:
Protecting the individual liberties of the American citizens is the purpose of government.
It is A purpose. A single part of the system created when the Articles of Confederation was replaced.
quote:
Tariffs should be about the only tax we have. However, it IS A TAX. And if you just add tariffs on existing taxes, then all you've done is add more taxes. There is a huge difference between being one of the only taxes to being an additional tax.
Well, we have always had them along with other taxes in some form or another.
quote:
And fighting with party and members doesn't mean shite here, I'm guessing you were desperate to hit a 3rd point.
Oh but it does when it is mentioned as an issue against Trump as if this has never happened before.
You and a few more are angry because Trump calls out GOP house and Senate members and seeks to replace the deadwood. People like Massie.
The petro dollar you mentioned is the line of attack used by socialists. People like Michael Hudson, Richard Wolff, and more....
Maybe you need to clarify what you believe a conservative is because as of now, you are blending ideas from several factions into what it is.
For me, im going with history and beliefs. This nation has been here for 250 years.
Conservatives do not believe in no gov. Our founding fathers did not believe in no gov. Historically they have not been anti tariff. Even Reagan. They have never been anti military.... even Reagan.
Where all of that comes from is literally Marxist and Libertarian attacks on our system.
Libertarians and marxists want a free flow of people. Conservatives do not. Etc etc.
All 3 used the military. ALL 3.
All 3 used tariffs.
All 3 fought with their party and members.
By your definition, they were not conservative.
All 3 used tariffs.
All 3 fought with their party and members.
By your definition, they were not conservative.
Again. I asked you to list the names of the admins in American History that were conservative to you.
Not 1 man. All the admins you would consider conservative.
Has there never been one?? Just Reagan?
Not 1 man. All the admins you would consider conservative.
Has there never been one?? Just Reagan?
And there it is. He refused to answer a simple question.
Here it is again...
Name the Admins IN American history that was conservative.
Here it is again...
Name the Admins IN American history that was conservative.
quote:
List one what?
You cant even keep up with all the crap you post. You said that Teump picked fights with conservatives.
No.
The truth is you have no idea what you are talking about. I can prove that by asking simple questions. Questions that I 100% believe you want answer.
1st one- name the Admins that was conservative.
re: Why are the conservative libertarians fighting maga so hard?
Posted by Jjdoc on 10/1/26 at 1:25 pm to Bunk Moreland
Massie and Ron are libertarian not conservatives. The party believes in open borders ...etc...
We are not the same.
We are not the same.
You are full of shite. 100% false. But you know that. You can not list one and make an argument for it.
re: Why are the conservative libertarians fighting maga so hard?
Posted by Jjdoc on 10/1/26 at 1:19 pm to cajunangelle
They have always been wolves in sheep's clothing.
90% of them are dishonest brokers just trying to win at the game.
90% of them are dishonest brokers just trying to win at the game.
re: Our President is once again threatening to wipe out Iran
Posted by Jjdoc on 10/1/26 at 1:16 pm to Bunk Moreland
So glad you have removed your mask over the past few months.
re: NYT reports - Hormuz oil flow near pre-war level. Iran leverage shrinking.
Posted by Jjdoc on 9/30/26 at 8:51 pm to Bunk Moreland
You are a great little leftist.
Not a single goal post was moved. Goals were set. Goals were achieved.
This isnt hard to grasp. Only a dishonest person would try to spin it.
quote:
The goalpost moves get more hilarious every day.
Not a single goal post was moved. Goals were set. Goals were achieved.
This isnt hard to grasp. Only a dishonest person would try to spin it.
re: NYT reports - Hormuz oil flow near pre-war level. Iran leverage shrinking.
Posted by Jjdoc on 9/30/26 at 3:37 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
We have taken 7 months to maybe open something that was already open,
Lol. Totally wrong. Supply lines changed. Deal with facts.
quote:
Ok, I'll put it this way then:
The reason I voted for Trump is because I was under the impression that is what he stood for.
I believe you.
Trump called out Iran many times. In 2015, he stated the same thing. He would use force. Get in and get out. The russian mercs got a little too close and Trump had them taken out. 200 of them if I remember.
Trump did not put boots on the ground with Iran. That wasnt the goal. We were not going to do that. We did not have to in fact.
But yes. Trump is all about letting the world know we will punch you in the face if we have too.
re: NYT reports - Hormuz oil flow near pre-war level. Iran leverage shrinking.
Posted by Jjdoc on 9/30/26 at 1:23 pm to Bunk Moreland
Way to create a narrative out of thin air while not even addressing the what you responded to.
You gnashed at the teeth and sky screamed in the face of facts and what was happening. All you could concentrate on is slamming Trump.
You specifically was shown what was happening and you knew it months ago. You knew that the oil was being rerouted. I gave YOU all of that and even told you the estimated dates that pipelines would be finished and operational.
Still you sky screamed. Now, you want to avoid it all.
You gnashed at the teeth and sky screamed in the face of facts and what was happening. All you could concentrate on is slamming Trump.
You specifically was shown what was happening and you knew it months ago. You knew that the oil was being rerouted. I gave YOU all of that and even told you the estimated dates that pipelines would be finished and operational.
Still you sky screamed. Now, you want to avoid it all.
quote:
Does that mean draining the swamp, ending foreign wars, putting America first and all the things talked about in 2024?
See, thats just as disingenuous as what the msm does. Or as disingenuous as Daboer making claims against you that you say you never made.
Trump never ran on not using the military. In fact, he stayed he would. He called out specifically Iran.
What Trump ran on was no more never ending wars.
Bunch of posters here said this would not happen because Trump is a meanie head.
I explained this in detail. Closing the strait was about removing Iran's ability to hold the world hostage.
I explained this in detail. Closing the strait was about removing Iran's ability to hold the world hostage.
re: Lindsay Clancy attorney now going after juror.
Posted by Jjdoc on 9/30/26 at 11:53 am to JimEverett
Exactly. This should be a warning to us all. This isnt a game to these people.
The delay is to allow the juror's attorney time to respond.
Earlier today, both the government and I were contacted by a professional local attorney who represents Juror Doe," Reddington said, not naming Desronvil due to an impoundment order from the court. "That attorney requested — as any qualified counsel would — adequate time to review our motion and reply. As is professional courtesy, both the government and I agreed to continue this specific motion to a later date at their request."
Earlier today, both the government and I were contacted by a professional local attorney who represents Juror Doe," Reddington said, not naming Desronvil due to an impoundment order from the court. "That attorney requested — as any qualified counsel would — adequate time to review our motion and reply. As is professional courtesy, both the government and I agreed to continue this specific motion to a later date at their request."
Lindsay Clancy attorney now going after juror.
Posted by Jjdoc on 9/30/26 at 8:58 am
So the juror refused to bend. It causes a mistrial, and now the attorney is going after the juror.
Yet another attack on our system. Either agree or be punished.
LINK
Yet another attack on our system. Either agree or be punished.
LINK
re: Marjorie Taylor Green to Candice Owens, hold by beer. Carvan heading to border.
Posted by Jjdoc on 9/27/26 at 2:18 pm to BoomerandSooner
True colors out
Popular
11
