
Started By
Message
Rivals is now charging high school athletes $499 for evaluation & ranking consideration
Posted on 9/24/26 at 11:39 am
Posted on 9/24/26 at 11:39 am
LINK
For decades, college football recruiting networks have made a business out of selling their expert evaluations and inside information on high school recruits to the most rabid of college football fans. Now, it seems one of those networks is flipping that model a bit and targeting the high school athletes themselves.
Throughout the history of recruiting networks like Rivals, 247Sports, ESPN, and On3, it’s been common for each site to evaluate and rank the top recruits in the country. Historically, these athletes have been discovered and evaluated naturally, with the sites’ reporters and scouts talking to coaches, attending high school games, watching tape, and attending recruiting camps.
One of those sites, however, has made a radical change.
Rivals, which On3 acquired last year, has rolled out a new program that lets high school athletes pay hundreds of dollars to be “evaluated” for “ranking consideration.” The site now offers athletes a chance to “get evaluated by a Rivals Scout” for $499 (though there’s currently a 20% off promotion that makes the price just $399). The site promises a scouting report, an evaluation grade, and ranking consideration.
“The goal is simple: evaluate more athletes, discover more talent, and create more opportunities. And do it with the integrity of Rivals at the center and the reach to ensure athletes who earn recognition receive the exposure they have earned,” Rivals writes of its new program.
The site says that this new program will allow more athletes to be evaluated by Rivals scouts, not just the top players.
“There is far more talent worth evaluating than the traditional recruiting ecosystem has historically been able to cover. In football alone, more than 1 million boys participate in high school football, while Rivals has typically carried approximately 6,600 star-rated prospects across the senior, junior, and sophomore classes at any one time. Rivals Recruits allows us to evaluate deeper into the talent pool and help identify athletes who may ultimately compete at the FBS, FCS, Division II, NAIA, Division III, and other levels,” Rivals states.
“Traditionally, national recruiting services have concentrated their resources primarily on prospects projected to play at the highest levels of college football. That represents only a small fraction of the total high school athlete population.”
While Rivals does state that the evaluation allows for “ranking consideration,” the site insists that payment does not guarantee a certain rating or star designation.
“No. Ratings, rankings and stars are earned, never bought. An athlete can purchase access to the Rivals Recruits evaluation process, but payment does not guarantee a rating, ranking, star designation or any specific evaluation outcome,” Rivals writes.
This change comes just a few months after 247Sports began prioritizing its own player ratings rather than the 247Sports Composite player ratings that blend the ratings from all the various recruiting networks.
247Sports announced back in March that, starting with the 2027 recruiting class, it would no longer use its composite player ratings to calculate its official team recruiting rankings. Instead, 247Sports will use only its own internal player rankings from its national scouting staff and analysts.
For decades, college football recruiting networks have made a business out of selling their expert evaluations and inside information on high school recruits to the most rabid of college football fans. Now, it seems one of those networks is flipping that model a bit and targeting the high school athletes themselves.
Throughout the history of recruiting networks like Rivals, 247Sports, ESPN, and On3, it’s been common for each site to evaluate and rank the top recruits in the country. Historically, these athletes have been discovered and evaluated naturally, with the sites’ reporters and scouts talking to coaches, attending high school games, watching tape, and attending recruiting camps.
One of those sites, however, has made a radical change.
Rivals, which On3 acquired last year, has rolled out a new program that lets high school athletes pay hundreds of dollars to be “evaluated” for “ranking consideration.” The site now offers athletes a chance to “get evaluated by a Rivals Scout” for $499 (though there’s currently a 20% off promotion that makes the price just $399). The site promises a scouting report, an evaluation grade, and ranking consideration.
“The goal is simple: evaluate more athletes, discover more talent, and create more opportunities. And do it with the integrity of Rivals at the center and the reach to ensure athletes who earn recognition receive the exposure they have earned,” Rivals writes of its new program.
The site says that this new program will allow more athletes to be evaluated by Rivals scouts, not just the top players.
“There is far more talent worth evaluating than the traditional recruiting ecosystem has historically been able to cover. In football alone, more than 1 million boys participate in high school football, while Rivals has typically carried approximately 6,600 star-rated prospects across the senior, junior, and sophomore classes at any one time. Rivals Recruits allows us to evaluate deeper into the talent pool and help identify athletes who may ultimately compete at the FBS, FCS, Division II, NAIA, Division III, and other levels,” Rivals states.
“Traditionally, national recruiting services have concentrated their resources primarily on prospects projected to play at the highest levels of college football. That represents only a small fraction of the total high school athlete population.”
While Rivals does state that the evaluation allows for “ranking consideration,” the site insists that payment does not guarantee a certain rating or star designation.
“No. Ratings, rankings and stars are earned, never bought. An athlete can purchase access to the Rivals Recruits evaluation process, but payment does not guarantee a rating, ranking, star designation or any specific evaluation outcome,” Rivals writes.
This change comes just a few months after 247Sports began prioritizing its own player ratings rather than the 247Sports Composite player ratings that blend the ratings from all the various recruiting networks.
247Sports announced back in March that, starting with the 2027 recruiting class, it would no longer use its composite player ratings to calculate its official team recruiting rankings. Instead, 247Sports will use only its own internal player rankings from its national scouting staff and analysts.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 11:45 am to TigerLunatik
I don't like the direction this is taking pal.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 11:46 am to Night Vision
I saw this on On3 earlier. It's fricking ridiculous.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 11:48 am to Night Vision
That’s going to hurt them in the long run
Posted on 9/24/26 at 11:55 am to GreatPumpkin
Honestly, fans and boosters are the ones that push star ratings for programs more than the coaches. I believe more coaches rely more heavily on the eye test and tape evaluation for players.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 11:58 am to Lizardman2
quote:
Honestly, fans and boosters are the ones that push star ratings for programs more than the coaches. I believe more coaches rely more heavily on the eye test and tape evaluation for players.
true tbh
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:01 pm to Old Money
They should pay the athletes that they give stars to they don't pay for an evaluation
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:01 pm to Night Vision
It's pretty obvious that between HS and the portal, talent eval has gotten bigger than most college teams can handle. I wouldn't be surprised if On3 has a goal of selling their eval to programs.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:06 pm to Night Vision
If 247 continues like they are and not starting to charge like Rivals, then Rivals won't last. Kids will just use 247. To try to keep kids paying, Rivals will start inflating the rankings for their players to try to get them recruited. That will catch up with them. After a while, schools won't trust them.
You have to believe they know 247 will also see the $$$ and start doing this as well. 247 will probably sit back and see what the response is.
You have to believe they know 247 will also see the $$$ and start doing this as well. 247 will probably sit back and see what the response is.
This post was edited on 9/24/26 at 12:07 pm
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:11 pm to Lizardman2
Honestly, fans and boosters are the ones that push star ratings for programs more than the coaches. I believe more coaches rely more heavily on the eye test and tape evaluation for players.
Very true but a lot of these guys adjust their recruiting rankings based on who offers you
Very true but a lot of these guys adjust their recruiting rankings based on who offers you
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:36 pm to Night Vision
I have a kid in the process right now. Depending on what they offer, it could be a steal. All of you would be shocked at what I paid for camps this year.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:42 pm to AUCE05
quote:
All of you would be shocked at what I paid for camps this year.
I was just thinking this. These sites don't have the capacity to actually scout each and every player in depth. They rely so much on kids coming to their camps to really get a deep look at them and this is every bit as a comparable as paying for a camp.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:45 pm to AUCE05
quote:
All of you would be shocked at what I paid for camps this year.
I'll bet the highly ranked prospects get in for free. Might even get a transportation stipend.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 12:56 pm to Night Vision
Not at first they didn't. It is like a business, you get your name out. I am talking SEC schools. He has finally received an invite to Bama and Auburn's camp.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 1:09 pm to Night Vision
They will be the ones with jacked up rankings. If they leave players out that don't pay then they won't have an accurate rankings.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 1:16 pm to Night Vision
This is great. Players get paid and now so do the scouts.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 1:17 pm to AUCE05
quote:
All of you would be shocked at what I paid for camps this year.
Extortion for stars...
This post was edited on 9/24/26 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 9/24/26 at 1:17 pm to Night Vision
Yeah, they aren’t going to charge a 4 or 5 stars anything. Those are the kids who bring people to their website.
The parents of the honorable mention all-state kids are going to have to pay up though.
The parents of the honorable mention all-state kids are going to have to pay up though.

Popular
Back to top


17











