Started By
Message
re: Other SEC fans - you want to expel LSU for breaking no rules and a halftime joke?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:38 am to Landmass
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:38 am to Landmass
quote:an average just shy of 6 million viewers.
It's a drop in the bucket.
More than Aggie or UF. And double the historic average of ole Miss
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:39 am to gatordmb89
quote:
No, LSU is good for the SEC. They aren’t getting booted.
There is an unwritten rule in Congress - never call for the vote unless you have the votes.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:43 am to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
I just want this to go away. Continuing to play teenage girl slap fighting in public isn't good for anyone. Sankey's job is to protect the image of the conference. LSU didn't roster the players, the response from the league should been to cool the temperatures and tie up any loose ends from behind closed doors.
This is embarrassing.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:44 am to CatfishJohn
In my hyperbolic posts on here? 150% YES. Unequivocally.
In real life? No.
In real life? No.
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 11:45 am
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:45 am to The Blue Stuff
ESPN will use anything they can to renegotiate a more favorable deal - that's just simple business. The conference could lose Vandy, and ESPN will use it as an excuse to get back to the table. It doesn't have to have any validity, it's a contractual clause that the SEC signed when they inked the media deal. SEC stands to lose money if they kick ANYONE out of the league. Business will rule over fandom 100x's out of 100 with the universities. They're here to make money.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:48 am to Landmass
quote:
LSU is not a true national brand
quote:
by Landmass
Landmass, i love you man, you are very entertaining on the board, but this is retarded.
think before you hit Submit.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:48 am to CatfishJohn
quote:
A founding/charter member of this historic conference and one that brings in a ton of viewers and revenue?
I understand this is a message board and you say shite you don't believe, but you think this is a good idea?
I don't want to be kicked out, for the record, and it's unbelievable that anyone thinks A) LSU's actions warrant it or B) this is good for anyone.
It seems pretty clear that if you bring in pro players the answer is yes, you will be removed.
If you don't fill those last 2 spots you left open for pro players, then you won't be.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:49 am to Lonnie Utah
quote:
In my hyperbolic posts on here? 150% YES. Unequivocally.
In real life? No.
Thank you for the honesty.
The history of this conference is one in which LSU is a major part, for almost a century. To end that over LSU actually not breaking a single rule is absolutely absurd. That's before we even talk about the economics, which LSU and the SEC enrich each other.
If our fellow SEC programs vote us out over not breaking any rules and a half time joke to Holly Rowe, they are being completely short sighted.
Should Kiffin shut up? Sure. But the SEC has dealt with a lot worse "institutional control" situations than this. This is about feelings, not reality. No rules have been broken. The SEC needs to handle this behind closed doors in a way that doesn't have expulsion on the table if they truly feel we should be punished for making jokes.
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 11:51 am
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:49 am to Boom33
quote:
It seems pretty clear that if you bring in pro players the answer is yes, you will be removed.
If you don't fill those last 2 spots you left open for pro players, then you won't be.
Then why did they call for a vote on Thursday when those players are not on our roster?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:51 am to CatfishJohn
I sure hope Rousse and Verge are on the phone with other members of the league right now.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:52 am to CatfishJohn
quote:
Thank you for the honesty.
I have two raison d'etre on this place. Trying to be humorous and trying to tell the truth. Why would I change now?
The problem is, most folks coflate those two things when they read my posts....
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 12:01 pm
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:54 am to CatfishJohn
quote:
Then why did they call for a vote on Thursday when those players are not on our roster?
Because you left 2 spots open on your roster to possibly add them later, and then Kiffin lacks the ability to keep his mouth shut.
It's literally a warning to LSU. If you don't play the pro players, then nothing is likely to happen. If you do add them, then these will be the consequences.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:57 am to Boom33
quote:
Because you left 2 spots open on your roster to possibly add them later, and then Kiffin lacks the ability to keep his mouth shut.
It's literally a warning to LSU. If you don't play the pro players, then nothing is likely to happen. If you do add them, then these will be the consequences.
We're not the only school with open roster spots. The kids aren't rostered. Yes, they were held open originally in case we could roster them, but we chose not to.
It seems premature to vote on expelling LSU. Do we need to fill those spots with someone off the street to make everyone feel better?
ETA:
And Kiffin making a Kiffin joke to Holly Rowe is quite a leap for "lack of institutional control"
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 11:58 am
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:57 am to CatfishJohn
No, I don't think LSU should be expelled, but if the allegations are true, this is a shot across the bow for your governor, political class, and boosters to step away before they torpedo the university. The conference is, for all intents and purposes, building an argument (or case) for a lack of institutional control at the university.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:57 am to CatfishJohn
quote:
Other SEC fans - you want to expel LSU for breaking no rules and a halftime joke?
I have no interest in seeing LSU expelled for this. There are programs that have shielded pedophiles (Penn State) and sexual assault (Baylor) who were never expelled from their conferences. It's true neither of those were the SEC, but my point is that LSU has done nothing to that level.
Now, I don't LIKE where college football is headed. I think each change has usually been with the caveat, "but only in situation X..." but we all know that's never the case. College football right now is textbook example of "give an inch, take a mile."
I don't blame Lane for taking advantage of the situation; he's not the disease, just a symptom of it.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:58 am to VFL67
quote:
No, but LSU needs to fall in line. I have no problem with the SEC making them sweat. They SEC is bigger than them, not the other way around
Maybe I'm slow, what rule did LSU break?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:58 am to rbtgoodson
quote:
The conference is, for all intents and purposes, building an argument (or case) for a lack of institutional control at the university.
Based on what?
We are in control. We haven't broken any rules.
End of the day it's because Kiffin is a loud mouth and people don't like him. He seems to be, however, in complete control of the situation.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:03 pm to SidewalkTiger
I think the state of Louisiana should've already done that. This entire affair has been a series of moving goalposts by the NCAA, the SEC and the individual universities. Their statements and their actions have been inconsistent within this single case, and as it relates to previous cases and actions in general over the years. I think a good set of lawyers would expose their rulings and enforcement as arbitrary and capricious.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:05 pm to VFL67
LSU fan here. I am in full agreement with you. This has gone too far and LSU needs to stand-down.
Back to top



0





