Started By
Message

re: New Arkansas AD very critical of coaching buyouts

Posted on 12/6/17 at 2:49 pm to
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
30212 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

Alabama wouldn't offer jimbo a 75 million contract at this time if Saban left.
IDK what Alabama would or will do when the time comes. Saban skewed the coaching market so damn bad, who knows what's on the horizon?
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
60148 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

We won't get him and be paying that much anyway though



He’s making 1.7 now though and will get a raise. Just saying that’s a ridiculous amount of money to be throwing at an assistant who is already one of the highest paid in the country while you’re simultaneously bitching about the rising costs of coaches
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

Some other teams are holding the line however.



Like who? LSU and......? Wisconsin?

quote:

Alabama wouldn't offer jimbo a 75 million contract at this time if Saban left.



No they wouldn't, because they have tasted recent success and they aren't that desperate for it to continue at this point.

Back when they were desperate, aka before they hired Saban, they were willing to offer Saban one of the biggest and riskiest contracts in college football up until that point to get him to leave Miami.
Posted by Beached Tusky
Member since Oct 2016
1867 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

Bitching about someone paying 10 million while ignoring your new employer just paid someone nearly 12 million to go away?


What part of this is confusing? We fired the dumbass who gave FatBert the idiotic extension with nothing to show for it but sucking.

THAT'S why we're paying the fat piece of shite 12mil, and that's why Jeff got the axe.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260263 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

IDK what Alabama would or will do when the time comes. Saban skewed the coaching market so damn bad, who knows what's on the horizon?


It's about maxed out. College football or football in general has passed its prime.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

It's about maxed out. College football or football in general has passed its prime.



That is hard to argue.
Posted by rockiee
Sugar Land, TX
Member since Jan 2015
28540 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

Just saying that’s a ridiculous amount of money to be throwing at an assistant who is already one of the highest paid in the country while you’re simultaneously bitching about the rising costs of coaches


Well, we don't even know for sure. That has all been rumors to this point. The 2.6 was higher than what I heard but it was well over 2. His main focus was the buyouts. If we end up giving him some huge buyout then I would understand the hypocrisy.

Once again, IMO he isn't trying to eliminate buyouts or even criticizing huge contracts. He thinks coaches are getting too much money when they don't win enough games. I don't think he just randomly through in the 100% twice if that wasn't something that was important.
This post was edited on 12/6/17 at 2:57 pm
Posted by JohnnyBob
The Lake
Member since Aug 2012
9482 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:05 pm to
And yet Morris' buyout looks almost like Burt's! Starts at 15M and drops to about 5M year 5. Starts as high but does drop off quicker..Still, pretty crazy after what we're going thru now.
This post was edited on 12/6/17 at 3:09 pm
Posted by rockiee
Sugar Land, TX
Member since Jan 2015
28540 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

And yet Morris' buyout looks almost like Burt's! Starts at 15M and drops to about 5M year 5. We didn't learn shite I reckon.


Link?
Posted by TxWadingFool
Middle Coast
Member since Sep 2014
4369 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:24 pm to
The 49-year-old Morris agreed to a six-year contract worth $3.5 million per year. He has incentives that could total an additional $1.2 million per year and has an annually decreasing buyout that begins at $14.7 million through Dec. 31, 2018

LINK

This post was edited on 12/6/17 at 3:31 pm
Posted by pioneerbasketball
Team Bunchie
Member since Oct 2005
132307 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

has an annually decreasing buyout
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80062 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

Typical A&M thing to lump in a guy with a sole natty with 2 coaches who have a combined 8.


Active head coaches who have won a national title as a head coach:

Saban (2003, 2009, 2011, 2012, 2015)
Meyer (2006, 2008, 2014)
Fisher (2013)
Swinney (2016)
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:46 pm to
He's right but you will never hire a big name coach again with that mentality unless every other school also refuses to give in. Coaches and agents look at the buyout as a big portion of their total salary package. If one school is paying 5 million with nothing owed to you if you are fired and another school offers 4.5 mil with a 10 million buyout clause, they will go with the 4.5 mil plus buyout all day long.
Posted by rockiee
Sugar Land, TX
Member since Jan 2015
28540 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

He has incentives that could total an additional $1.2 million per year


Interesting

quote:

has an annually decreasing buyout that begins at $14.7 million through Dec. 31, 2018


Doesn't really tell us anything unless we see the breakdown by year. If the 5th year it reaches around 5m then we could assume it decreases around around 2m per year. As long as we don't give him some huge raise after a 6-6 year 2, I think it isn't bad.

A lot of guesstimates in that.
This post was edited on 12/6/17 at 3:56 pm
Posted by momentoftruth87
Member since Oct 2013
71421 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 3:56 pm to
Says a lot about a person though. Arkansas might not be an attractive situation compared to a large school. However, the coach is earning damn good money and he better perform to earn it. Buyouts will be gone soon, when these schools don't see the return on their investment.
Posted by Drewbie
tFlagship
Member since Jun 2012
57812 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

And hence why they had to hire an up-and-comer instead of an established name.
Weren't you literally saying Arkansas won the offseason less than 24 hours ago?
Posted by Diary Queen
Member since Jul 2017
1392 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 4:01 pm to
It's like the prisoners are running the prison.
Posted by rockiee
Sugar Land, TX
Member since Jan 2015
28540 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

Weren't you literally saying Arkansas won the offseason less than 24 hours ago?


That was before our AD dared to say anything about the Kevin Sumlin buyout
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

Weren't you literally saying Arkansas won the offseason less than 24 hours ago?



Those two things aren't contradictory.

Arkansas could have had to settle for an up-and-comer, and it could have been the right up-and-comer.

Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25593 posts
Posted on 12/6/17 at 4:10 pm to
Option A: you pay the salary and the buyout

Option B: you pay a higher salary and no buyout

This is how life works. Quid pro quo. This for that.

The AD is going to lean towards the buyout everytime. If the risk was too high that the coach would fail, the AD wouldn't put his own signature to the coaching contract.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter