cardboardboxer
| Favorite team: | Texas A&M |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | New Orleans born Aggie. |
| Interests: | technology, beer, conference realignment |
| Occupation: | Administration |
| Number of Posts: | 34869 |
| Registered on: | 4/10/2012 |
| Online Status: | Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Who else is dealing with the ESPN/YouTube TV crap?
Posted by cardboardboxer on 11/7/25 at 4:06 pm to flagshipuniversity
quote:
They will all do it before it's all said and done.
Eh, not without Congress helping them. ATSC 3.0 support in devices is going backwards because of the DRM crap they are pushing. Most OTA is still ATSC 1.0.
re: My analysis of streaming services for ESPN sports
Posted by cardboardboxer on 11/7/25 at 2:02 pm to Landmass
quote:
Yes, brother, I think a lot of us also use an antenna but I won't be able to get any games that aren't on ABC, Fox, or CBS. NBC signal is too weak at my house so I can't get anything on that. With an antenna only, you're only going to be able to watch 3 games on a Saturday, but nothing that is on ESPN or SECN.
Actually CW has games now too.
re: My analysis of streaming services for ESPN sports
Posted by cardboardboxer on 11/7/25 at 1:10 pm to 3nOut
Yeah the flat ones work good if you are near a city, but I have a bad arse $50 one too and I can get Waco stations in north Austin.
One advantage of the Tablo is you can tuck it and the antenna in the attic and then its on your wifi so you don't have to worry about the wife complaining it looks bad
One advantage of the Tablo is you can tuck it and the antenna in the attic and then its on your wifi so you don't have to worry about the wife complaining it looks bad
re: All this parity is a blast
Posted by cardboardboxer on 11/7/25 at 12:43 pm to 3down10
quote:
The bottom line is you had your chance and lost. You only scored 24 points total and lost by 28. You weren't going to win a National Championship that year, you weren't good enough.
Yall lost to LSU and got a rematch for the 2012 title. By your logic yall weren't good enough that year for that title or that rematch, you just got lucky regarding a plane crash. End result is what is on the books is a Bama national title despite yall not being good enough, despite yall "having your chance and lost" thanks to luck.
Why should the national title be left to luck like that?
quote:
None of those G5 teams you list were good.
Maybe 2017 UCF was we don't know they didn't get a chance. They did everything they could on the field to deserve that chance unlike Bama the year they got a rematch in the BCS game.
How can you justify a system that leaves programs out that do everything they can to win and it isn't good enough, and yet other programs get a mulligan thanks to luck?
In the current era 2017 UCF would have had a chance. TCU in 2010 would have gotten a chance. Auburn in 2004 would have gotten a chance.
re: My analysis of streaming services for ESPN sports
Posted by cardboardboxer on 11/7/25 at 12:32 pm to Ag Zwin
Having a dedicated streaming box is a good idea, but weaker Android TV devices suck and Amazon is muddying their waters on purpose. Here is the hierarchy of streaming boxes:
1. Apple TV - best in class, has best interface performance and best quality apps. Sucks that they shove their service down your throat but what makes it the best is screen mirroring from Apple devices can be used easily with dodgy streaming sites (that is how I watch Saints games this year frick Sunday Ticket). Problem is this is expensive.
2. Shield TV Pro - gives an experience close to Apple TV especially if you are willing to change out the launcher. Doesn't have quite the app polish that Apple TV apps have, but has the advantage of sideloading apps Google doesn't want you to have. Like for example I have SmartTube loaded on mine with allows my son to watch Youtube without ads without me paying for premium. Is expensive though.
3. onn 4K Pro - basically a cheap Shield TV. Has all the advantages of that device at one fourth the price, just a little more sluggish than Shield TV. Only found at walmart.
4. Roku Devices - Has good quality apps, is easy to use, and best of all is cheap compared to 1 and 2. No sideloading, but maybe the easiest interface of the bunch. This is the one I give to family members.
5. Fire TV Devices - has some of the advantages of the Shield TV (sideloading maybe), and has good app support. Problem is interface is STUFFED with ads and you can't change that, plus this year they forked the devices and some are based on Android still and others aren't and it means you have to be careful what to buy. These used to be 3 on the list but I have trouble recommending them knowing that Amazon is working to lock them down.
1. Apple TV - best in class, has best interface performance and best quality apps. Sucks that they shove their service down your throat but what makes it the best is screen mirroring from Apple devices can be used easily with dodgy streaming sites (that is how I watch Saints games this year frick Sunday Ticket). Problem is this is expensive.
2. Shield TV Pro - gives an experience close to Apple TV especially if you are willing to change out the launcher. Doesn't have quite the app polish that Apple TV apps have, but has the advantage of sideloading apps Google doesn't want you to have. Like for example I have SmartTube loaded on mine with allows my son to watch Youtube without ads without me paying for premium. Is expensive though.
3. onn 4K Pro - basically a cheap Shield TV. Has all the advantages of that device at one fourth the price, just a little more sluggish than Shield TV. Only found at walmart.
4. Roku Devices - Has good quality apps, is easy to use, and best of all is cheap compared to 1 and 2. No sideloading, but maybe the easiest interface of the bunch. This is the one I give to family members.
5. Fire TV Devices - has some of the advantages of the Shield TV (sideloading maybe), and has good app support. Problem is interface is STUFFED with ads and you can't change that, plus this year they forked the devices and some are based on Android still and others aren't and it means you have to be careful what to buy. These used to be 3 on the list but I have trouble recommending them knowing that Amazon is working to lock them down.
re: My proposed new structure for CFB (long)
Posted by cardboardboxer on 11/7/25 at 12:05 pm to AUTiger789
The presidents are terrified because court cases have ripped the NCAA apart and they don't want the liability for the sport anymore.
What will fix this is an act of congress that trades fixing player payment in trade for letting more teams across the country have access to the big boy table.
What will fix this is an act of congress that trades fixing player payment in trade for letting more teams across the country have access to the big boy table.
re: Which has more potential? Oklahoma or A&M...
Posted by cardboardboxer on 11/7/25 at 11:56 am to Oklahomey
I will say as an Aggie who has been a fan since the Big 12 era the fact this is even a debate makes me smile
In the Big 12 OU fricking smothered us with a pillow. Each year flipping our recruits, sometimes getting them to rub it in (I will never forgive Venables for the "Mr. Texas A&M" bullshite he pulled).
I personally hated OU so much back then because I felt like they stole our birthrate by taking the second best players in Texas every year (after the Horns got their picks). We would be lucky to get a handful of Texas four stars in the Big 12 era post-Slocum each year, while Stoops was loading up his roster with them.
Texas A&M going to the SEC finally flipped that. We went from fridge top 20 recruiting rankings to consistent top 10 rankings, and OU was the one who paid most of the price for that. You would see it when OU would play teams outside the Big 12 in the playoffs and they didn't have the horses to keep up. Post SEC move those horses were on our roster, and I think the OU leadership waking up to how much conference realignment in 2011 fricked them vs us is why they pushed the Horns to join the SEC with them.
But then Jimbo and NiL changed our equation again. Suddenly we were recruiting nationally, and using money to make it so we were a threat for every four star on the board. That means that both a modern OU and A&M can do well independent of how the other does, especially if the Horns go through another period of decline.
So now I don't hate OU anymore, I hate their coach for what he did to us 20 years ago in recruiting but once OU has a new coach I won't care. I will root for them vs non-SEC teams like any other SEC team not named Texas at that point (because frick Texas).
In the Big 12 OU fricking smothered us with a pillow. Each year flipping our recruits, sometimes getting them to rub it in (I will never forgive Venables for the "Mr. Texas A&M" bullshite he pulled).
I personally hated OU so much back then because I felt like they stole our birthrate by taking the second best players in Texas every year (after the Horns got their picks). We would be lucky to get a handful of Texas four stars in the Big 12 era post-Slocum each year, while Stoops was loading up his roster with them.
Texas A&M going to the SEC finally flipped that. We went from fridge top 20 recruiting rankings to consistent top 10 rankings, and OU was the one who paid most of the price for that. You would see it when OU would play teams outside the Big 12 in the playoffs and they didn't have the horses to keep up. Post SEC move those horses were on our roster, and I think the OU leadership waking up to how much conference realignment in 2011 fricked them vs us is why they pushed the Horns to join the SEC with them.
But then Jimbo and NiL changed our equation again. Suddenly we were recruiting nationally, and using money to make it so we were a threat for every four star on the board. That means that both a modern OU and A&M can do well independent of how the other does, especially if the Horns go through another period of decline.
So now I don't hate OU anymore, I hate their coach for what he did to us 20 years ago in recruiting but once OU has a new coach I won't care. I will root for them vs non-SEC teams like any other SEC team not named Texas at that point (because frick Texas).
re: My proposed new structure for CFB (long)
Posted by cardboardboxer on 11/7/25 at 11:47 am to AUTiger789
ESPN isn't going to let this shite happens.
The whole problem with college football is the closest thing we have to a commissioner is Disney's CEO.
The whole problem with college football is the closest thing we have to a commissioner is Disney's CEO.
re: Zach Calzone with cringiest video of 2025 so far
Posted by cardboardboxer on 11/7/25 at 11:45 am to Frac the world
quote:
Why do all former Aggy QBs talk like incoherent ghetto wannabes?
Because they don't stay long enough to get straightened out.
re: Zach Calzada looks foolish in a tweet.
Posted by cardboardboxer on 11/7/25 at 11:44 am to SPAGHETTI PLATE
He is like the player version of Hugh Freeze- getting paid what he didn't deserve for Bama wins.
re: Sports Illustrated leading journalist predicts Lane Kiffin will remain at Ole Miss
Posted by cardboardboxer on 11/7/25 at 11:43 am to Nasty_Canasta
I don't see why he wouldn't try the NFL again if he got a shot at it.
re: All this parity is a blast
Posted by cardboardboxer on 11/7/25 at 11:42 am to 3down10
quote:
Or because you got blown out by Alabama and didn't really have a team capable of winning it.
I mean Notre Dame got its wheels beat off by Clemson and they got in over us. Our game with Bama was closer by the stats of the game, like if you look at total yards in both games.
The bottom line is if we had Notre Dame's program reputation and they had ours we would have gotten in over them. That is the exact kind of bullshite the current system ended.
Each year should be its own thing, it shouldn't matter what your program did previous years to help tip the scale.
Another example would be how in the old system Group of Five teams had to be good for YEARS to get considered for the playoffs. Cincinnati had to be good for YEARS to crack that glass ceiling like they did. Along the way deserving programs like 2017 UCF got fricked because they only had one amazing year. Now that couldn't happen anymore.
re: My analysis of streaming services for ESPN sports
Posted by cardboardboxer on 11/7/25 at 11:31 am to Landmass
Yall really need to consider getting a Tablo plus a decent antenna.
One time purchase of around $120 for both (I got it for $70 in a sale I expect to repeat black friday) and then you can have ABC, CBS, Fox, CW and NBC on any smart device in your house (your phone, AppleTV, Roku, Android TV).
With Tablo you get a TV-guide style menu, you can record games, pause/fast forward in games, and can watch either two or four games at once (depending on which Tablo you get).
Doesn't give access to ESPN, but it gives you access to a LOT of college football without worrying about what major company is fricking over some other major company for the price of one month of Youtube TV (if you get the device on sale).
One time purchase of around $120 for both (I got it for $70 in a sale I expect to repeat black friday) and then you can have ABC, CBS, Fox, CW and NBC on any smart device in your house (your phone, AppleTV, Roku, Android TV).
With Tablo you get a TV-guide style menu, you can record games, pause/fast forward in games, and can watch either two or four games at once (depending on which Tablo you get).
Doesn't give access to ESPN, but it gives you access to a LOT of college football without worrying about what major company is fricking over some other major company for the price of one month of Youtube TV (if you get the device on sale).
re: Aggies/Longhorns tickets have jumped another 10% in a few days
Posted by cardboardboxer on 11/7/25 at 11:24 am to SEC Doctor
Some of it is we haven't played in Austin in a generation.
Plenty of Aggies like me live near Austin. Williamson County has the largest A&M club in the state.
Plenty of Aggies like me live near Austin. Williamson County has the largest A&M club in the state.
re: All this parity is a blast
Posted by cardboardboxer on 11/7/25 at 11:19 am to 3down10
quote:
If it was the BCS or 4 team playoff Texas A&M would still be in it this year and it would be more meaningful.
Maybe, we got fricked in 2020 because we weren't a big enough brand name.
re: All this parity is a blast
Posted by cardboardboxer on 11/6/25 at 7:18 pm to 3down10
quote:
Lowering the standards so you can feel included doesn't mean improvement.
It’s an improvement for those of us outside the 10 programs that had a chance to be taken seriously by the committee every year.
re: Sam Pittman had Hogs Rolling in 21
Posted by cardboardboxer on 11/6/25 at 4:28 pm to stitchop
Their own AD admitted how far behind on NiL are
re: 26 OU Baseball Schedule
Posted by cardboardboxer on 11/6/25 at 3:46 pm to OU Guy
Lots of Aggies on there
re: Billy Gillespie is coaching Tarleton State tonight against LSU
Posted by cardboardboxer on 11/6/25 at 3:18 pm to Raoul_Duke
Wow I never saw that, so him
re: Aggies, remember all those Arkansas foul ball gifs you all posted the past seven years?
Posted by cardboardboxer on 11/6/25 at 3:13 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
Would
Popular
0












