Started By
Message

re: LSU fans, honest question...

Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:12 am to
Posted by diddlydawg7
2x Best Poster Elite 8 (2x Sweet 16
Member since Oct 2017
27598 posts
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:12 am to
quote:

RB10


Your first post on SECRant in 10 days! What happened bro?
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Midwest, USA
Member since Dec 2019
52488 posts
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:14 am to
I didnt understand most of the bravado from our fans this offseason.

We had 14 players drafted, lost another 3 or 4 to UDFA, then lost 2 or 3 to Covid, and had 2 or 3 transfer.

That puts the majority of the pressure on our 2018 recruiting class which was ranked 15th and thats with guys like Jamarr Chase being included.

It was never in the cards for LSU to be very good this season, if they only lose 3 games I'll count that as a successful year.

You just have no chemistry or experience at the important positions that involve a lot of communication like the offensive line, quarterback, and secondary.
This post was edited on 10/6/20 at 9:16 am
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43811 posts
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:14 am to
quote:

Your first post on SECRant in 10 days! What happened bro?


Don’t post here much at all anymore. Didn’t last year while LSU was making a title run.

Don’t see a reason. LSU gets plenty of attention thanks to posters like you.
Posted by Captain Crown
Member since Jun 2011
50767 posts
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:16 am to
quote:

I think LSU is lucky they only have to face one difficult DL this year. The fact that they gave up 7 sacks to Mississippi St does not bode well for them


Do you feel as though they won't progress any as the season continues?
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
26251 posts
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:21 am to
It was a perfect storm of things:

-obviously LSU lost a ton to draft and opt-outs
-Stingley out last minute
-Players in the secondary playing that had no business being on the field yet
-Pelini had an awful game plan and for whatever reason didn’t adjust during game
-Pelini/O have said all offseason how they want a more aggressive and attacking D, and that’s all fine and good overall, but was not the right strategy for that particular game against that particular team/coach, but they were stubbornly determined to showcase this new strategy in Game1
-LSU coaches came into the game too cocky/stubborn (Specifically on defense)
-MSU offense really played well, especially the QB
-LSU was shell-shocked by MSU playing well
-LSU offense clearly wasn’t ready for a shoot-out just yet and clearly wasn’t as polished and ready for Game1 as MSU was
-LSU made the mistake of getting caught up in a shootout and didn’t run the ball enough, which would have helped the crappy defense
-limited fan capacity which pretty much negated any home field advantage

Long story short...LSU was ripe to be upset, and MSU took full advantage of the opportunity/circumstances

As far as LSU is concerned, it absolutely sucked but probably good that it happened early and can get everyone’s attention real quick and can be used a teaching/learning moment
This post was edited on 10/6/20 at 9:52 am
Posted by diddlydawg7
2x Best Poster Elite 8 (2x Sweet 16
Member since Oct 2017
27598 posts
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:36 am to
quote:

Do you feel as though they won't progress any as the season continues?


They 100% will, but giving up 7 sacks is a tough place to start. Not to mention opposing DLs can improve
Posted by Dixie Normus
Earth
Member since Sep 2013
2635 posts
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:41 am to
While I fully admit that the scheme was poor, I think having the best corner in America hospitalized the night before the game had more to do with the defensive showing than the scheme itself.

There’s a lot more options on defense when one player can remove the opponent’s best receiver from the field on 95% of the defensive snaps.
Posted by IotaTiger
Tickfaw, La.
Member since Jul 2011
1099 posts
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:42 am to
Having the majority of the team in and around hospital till 2-3 AM night before game, concerned Stingley could actually DIE from allergic reaction, which in turn no DB played their normal position they practiced all camp probably didn’t help, just saying.
Posted by America1776
USA
Member since Jul 2010
1537 posts
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:43 am to
You could say Georgia’s defense was lucky to only face one good offense last year, unfortunately it was late in the season.
Looks like they’ve got 2 schedule this year, so we’ll see if they can make some adjustments afterwards.

Not saying LSU won’t keep giving up sacks, and part of that is on a less-mobile QB, but I’d rather learn the lesson early than it cost us in something that actually matters.
Posted by bayou85
Concordia
Member since Sep 2016
8620 posts
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:43 am to
Playing more zone would have helped. But also game experience would have helped. Like Ricks made a play that gave up a TD that he probably wouldn't have made with more experience.

Ward playing hurt. He shouldn't have been on the field. He didn't know he was playing until Stingly was out. he wasn't going to dress.

The offense staying on the field would have helped especially early in the game. I mean, we only lost by 10. If Myles had more experience playing, then maybe we win, maybe we go to OT. IDK.

State just outplayed LSU. Happens. IDK if we'd have won with all of that but I'd have been less angry about it. Losing isn't the end of the world this year. We have a lot of inexperience on the field. But not changing things in-game was infuriating.
Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:44 am to
quote:

Ward played hurt
this was probably the deciding factor in the game. had stingley been available, ward doesn't have to play. that's a HUGE HUGE swing towards lsu. i didn't want to say that having stingley would have been a win because that's an excuse but, looking at week 2, i think stingley might have made the difference, even with pelini playing man given that stingley excels at that. i definitely think if the first two weeks had been reversed, lsu would be undefeated.

the mystery was flott. he graded really well last season even though he didn't play nearly as much as stingley/fulton. i don't know what the problem was but he seemed to get his sea legs at vandy. made some plays.
Posted by diddlydawg7
2x Best Poster Elite 8 (2x Sweet 16
Member since Oct 2017
27598 posts
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:46 am to
quote:

You could say Georgia’s defense was lucky to only face one good offense last year,


Except you couldn’t. We played 6 top-30 offenses.
Posted by America1776
USA
Member since Jul 2010
1537 posts
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:47 am to
quote:

top-30


Need you to move the bar up juuuuust a little there, bud lol
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37490 posts
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:50 am to
quote:

Do you think if LSU's defense had adopted a different scheme, could you have beaten Mississippi State?


100% yes. They should have been playing/practicing zone the minute State was announced to be our opening opponent.

quote:

Or was your defense just too depleted from the draft and players opting out to make a difference regardless?


No. Vincent opting out Stingley Jr. not being there absolutely hurt, but there is enough raw athletic absolute at safety and CB we should have been able to keep things in front of us.

quote:

Or was MSU's QB just so on point that particular day, none of it mattered and you were only going to win by hitting almost 50 points on offense? )


Oh he was on, but what killed us was YAC because we were in man and had our backs turned and struggled to come off our man and rally to the ball.

quote:

You've seen State against another opponent, and you've seen LSU against another opponent (granted it was Vandy, but still). Going back now, do you think it was a failure of personnel, coaching, or just wrong time, wrong place (or right time, right place for MSU's offense?


Combination of coaching, people opting out/being out/being hurt, and weird year. If LSU has a full stadium, I think we win that game.
Posted by Captain Crown
Member since Jun 2011
50767 posts
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:51 am to
quote:

but giving up 7 sacks is a tough place to start


Seems like they could only improve then .
Posted by Mithridates6
Member since Oct 2019
8220 posts
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:52 am to
I'm not sure LSU had enough time to install different coverages with all the new/inexperienced players. Man is the simplest scheme to play. Still the defense gave us 4 turnovers and the offense didn't do shite for the entire first half. I think the paper-thin D was worn out by the 2nd half
Posted by diddlydawg7
2x Best Poster Elite 8 (2x Sweet 16
Member since Oct 2017
27598 posts
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:52 am to
quote:

Need you to move the bar up juuuuust a little there, bud lol


There are 130 FBS teams. We played 6 teams that were in the top 23% of offenses. For the record, LSU played 6 top 30 offenses last year as well.

Other than LSU, we held them each to 0, 13, 14, 14, and 17. Our defense was the best in the country last year.
Posted by CFFreak
Rjyh, AL
Member since May 2019
8765 posts
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:52 am to
quote:

So let's talk some actual football in this place.



The Rant is not equipped to handle this sort of thing. But good luck anyways.
Posted by America1776
USA
Member since Jul 2010
1537 posts
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:55 am to
quote:

Our defense was the best in the country last year.


And yet, my point remains—They were woefully unprepared in the SEC championship game.

I remember seeing UGA only faced one or two starting QBs all of last year at some point. Rest were backups or WRs playing QB. Maybe if they’d faced a decent QB up to that point it could have prepare them better? That’s my only point
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
68308 posts
Posted on 10/6/20 at 9:56 am to
quote:

Do you think if LSU's defense had adopted a different scheme, could you have beaten Mississippi State?



Considering Arkansas was able to zone them to death, it begs the question could we have done the same. Yes it sucked to lose Stingley, but I doubt Arkansas still has notably more talent than us in the secondary even with him out. We came in with just a really stupid scheme for that game and credit to Costello for making the throws in the 1 on 1 coverage, but with the pressure our DL was already able to get, it made no sense to be blitzing more than 50% of the time that game and leave so many 1 on 1s everywhere where they could get away with things like pick plays to get someone opened up as well. In zone, that doesnt happen.

Having to play Evans/Ward when both were not supposed to play sucks, but we put them in the worst spots possible covering so many dudes 1 on 1 all game. If you give them some help in zone, you see what happens when you force Costello or an air raid like Leach's into fitting the ball into tight bracketed windows constantly rather than throwing it up to a lot of 1 on 1 matchups and guys you can pick/rub open.

Washington routinely shut down Leach at Wazzu and embarrassed their offense each and every year just by zoning them and only rushing 3 or 4 all game.
This post was edited on 10/6/20 at 11:13 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter