Favorite team:LSU 
Location:GSU Eagles fan
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:72795
Registered on:10/24/2007
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Niang was definitely most disappointing to me in the debut, he's supposed to be the top international player potentially coming into college basketball. He's gotta be better. It's a exhibition game 1, so not worried at all yet.

Dessert also to needs to be better
quote:

Ole Miss and Texas better be careful



Kamario isnt likely to play, if he does, he wont be effective. He barely was getting around before being benched this past weekend.

re: Real question LSU

Posted by thunderbird1100 on 10/25/26 at 5:33 pm to
Thank you for funding our football team this year

re: Nate Sheppard question

Posted by thunderbird1100 on 10/25/26 at 8:48 am to
The "no good player exists outside the SEC" crowd is one that needs to be studied

Ty Benefield wasn't any good when he was at Boise, but he is now that he's at LSU

Same for Jackson Harris at Hawaii, obv not a player, but is now that he's here!
-3 turnover margin and Auburn was able to run the ball on them

When you go that negative in turnover battle and allow other team to grind you down running the ball a bit, this kind of thing can happen
quote:

Ruzic is only a freshman.


He's 20 years old, so not really in the sense of a true freshman necessarily, but he should have 4 years of eligibility I believe.

We might be lucky to get more than 2 years out of him though.
quote:

Option A:
12 game schedules that are formatted like this
9 SEC games
1 B1G
1 Big 12
1 ACC


As a fan, this would be awesome.

As a realist, I dont think you can leave it to a human committee to choose the playoff spots solely. Would really like to see a computer element come back in.

SEC SOS is already higher, but being 9-3 vs. 10-2 in other conferences doesnt give you any credence for playing a tougher schedule and possibly performing better against it. I just dont like how many tend to view all the 4 conferences the same while schedules are still so imbalanced one to the next.

This doesnt mean I always think a 9-3 SEC team should go over a 10-2 ACC/B12(or even B10) teamn, but I dont think it should automatically go the other way as well. Needs to be a true deep dive into resumes. A 10-2 team from one of the other conferences could have legitimately only played only 2 maybe 3 good teams. No SEC team is getting around playing less than 4 good teams in a season and many play 5 or 6.
I'm trying to understand why Sankey would sign up for this.

So UF, UGA, UK, USC still all expected to keep their traditional ACC rivals, play a B10 team every year and a 9 game conference schedule? :lol:
quote:


At that point, why do we need conferences and championship games?


There are no more conference championship games next year with the 24 team playoff, they got rid of them
quote:

Some of yall act like it’s impossible to let your corners play man while the rest of the defense like the lb’s and safeties can focus on limiting brown’s legs. Playing soft zone isn’t how you combat a running qb. Being aggressive, blitzing the hell out of them if you have thw players is much more effective. Let pj and Pickett man up on the boundary while the rest of the defense hunts



Keep in mind playing man with the corners means if 1 guy misses a tackle on an outside run by Brown he is off to the races with your corner running with a receiver downfield. Thats the risk you run.

I'm not saying I disagree at all we should be manning up with our corners more often than not, but there's a reason so many teams play zone against QBs that run a lot, its so the corners can go make a play if needed in the run game.

re: Greg Sankey is an idiot.

Posted by thunderbird1100 on 10/22/26 at 7:31 am to
The bigger travesty is 3 B10 teams that are still in playoff contention didnt even play a single team with a pulse OOC because the B10 doesnt require a P4 OOC team on anyone's schedule

On top of that, the bottom part of the Big Ten is just god awful compared to the SEC overall. Imagine being a B10 team and getting Illinois, Minnesota, Purdue, Michigan St, Maryland & Rutgers on your schedule this season and not even playing anyone OOC. With it being an 18 team league, theres an even higher chance you avoid the few top teams they actually have, especially if you are one of those top teams.

re: MBB Roster Updated

Posted by thunderbird1100 on 10/21/26 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

what if his best walk on is a PG and isn't needed as much, or isn't available?


We had 3 guards and 2 bigs, you dont think he wants to give any of the guards a breather over TWO games if his best walk on is one of the small guards he has?

Might I remind you they actually tried a walk on outside of Bender and it was the 7 footer who was horrific in a total of 3 minutes being -7.

I mean the arugments here :lol:

re: MBB Roster Updated

Posted by thunderbird1100 on 10/21/26 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

this is based on having seen zero minutes from the other walk-ons.



....

I mean are you seriously under the impression Wade is intentionally playing a worse walk on over others in games where we've been playing 6-7 guys total?

Bender had a rough first go being -9 over 10 minutes in game 1, the same game Pearson played 3 minutes and was -7 by comparison (ouch that is BAD). Bender was +5 in 10 minutes against UCF, which was actually BETTER than Ugochukwu or Dioubate.

I mean, you have to be off some sort of rocker to think Wade isn't playing his best walk on in games where he has 5 scholarship level players available to play :lol:
This is super exciting stuff, but also super frustrating stuff to see what Wade COULD have done here had he never gotten fired, going into the actual NIL era, with the support he gets.

re: MBB Roster Updated

Posted by thunderbird1100 on 10/21/26 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

n the mcneese game bender looked confused like it was all too fast.

in the UCF game he still looked slow but made some shots. his motion is very very weird he moves his arm and rolls the ball off his palm or something its hard to describe.

my theory is that bender is truly abysmal and on the team because his dad is a friend of wade and/or stansbury from recruiting help and connections.

I could be wrong he could be normal walk on level. but I think he is worse.


Just a weird post all around.

Bender played more minutes than any of our walk ons over the first 2 games. In fact, 2 of the walks played 0 minutes in either game. Only 1 other walk on played, and for 3 minutes total in game 1.

He is clearly a step above of them (although again, he isnt on the level of the other guys beyond them).

re: MBB Roster Updated

Posted by thunderbird1100 on 10/21/26 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

I thought shooting was Niangs strength as well?



He has never taken more than 0.7 3PA per game in a season playing professionally. Its more just not really a part of his game. He will probably take a little more per game than that here, but Wade was always a fan of 3s and getting to the rim. He hates mid-range jumpers. Niang can get to the bucket without a doubt.

Niang's biggest strength is basically the ability to guard anyone on a college basketball court and be an absolute menace with his 7 foot wingpsan and elite athleticism. Very very high motor that rebounds really well for a guy his size and the ability to get to the rim when you dont normally would expect it.
FCS has been at 24 for a while and worked really well there

I dont see expansion in the near future beyond that unless they start to re-org the divisions as a whole

I've said for years now Division I should really be 3 subdivisions, not 2.

Most mid-majors and top FCS teams need to be able to play for their own national title, pretending Wyoming should be on the same playing field as UGA or Ohio St is just silly over long term in terms of competition. There are also top FCS teams that just ransack over most of the FCS competition (like an NDSU that just moved up to FBS).

Let the power conference teams have their own playoff (maybe even drag up a few of the top mid majors, kind of like a few of the "power conferences" already have). Let the FBs mid-majors and top FCS teams play their own playoff and let the remaining FCS teams have their playoff.

Something for every team to really play for.

There's some upset folks out there moving to 24 in FBS and not having all 10 conferences have an auto bid is a travesty - in FCS all conferences hav an auto bid to their 24 team playoff. But do we really want 8-4 Akron champion of the MAC taking a spot of 9-3 maybe even 10-2 power conference team? Yeah, I dunno about that.

re: MBB Roster Updated

Posted by thunderbird1100 on 10/21/26 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

Isn’t the entire 15 player roster scholarship eligible?



Yeah im not saying they are literally paying their own way, we can give out 15 scholarships, my point was more of who is seen as a walk on level player, and to me thats including Bender. He was not some D1 level recruit.

The way I'd break it down is basically this:

Guys who will play a lot and rotate often
Dent
Clark
Bashir
Ugochukwu
Niang
Dioubate
Dessert
Ruzic

Guys who are clearly better than the walk on level guys, a clear step down from the aboe, but could factor in foul or injury type situations to the above
Nunez (once healthy)
Levy

Walk on level players who probably wont play in anything but blowout situations
Bender [Better than the below, but still not close to the above]
Pearson
Fife
Stansbury

re: MBB Roster Updated

Posted by thunderbird1100 on 10/21/26 at 10:47 am to
quote:

Main bench rotation:
Abdi Bashir Jr.
Michael Ruzic
Divine Ugochukwu
Austin Nunez


It's really just the first 3 guys, Nunez and Levy are better than the walk ons for sure but are clear CLEAR steps down from the rest of the Top 8 guys. They to me are "break glass in case of injury/foul trouble" to the guards or bigs happen basically. I dont expect to see much of them outside of that or blowouts.

Also it seems like Nunez might not even be able to play for a while this year being in a boot the exhibition games.

I know there's some confusion around Bender being a walk on or scholarship guy, regardless of the designation understand he averaged 8 and 8 in high school last season and didnt have a recruiting profile anywhere - long story short, also dont expect him to play much any outside of blowouts. They like him better than the 3 other walk ons for later potential but he's just a practice body really for now.

re: MBB Roster Updated

Posted by thunderbird1100 on 10/21/26 at 10:46 am to
quote:

If you want the team to be the most well rounded, and a better defensive lineup, i think you go with clark, but obviously they both will play alot



Yeah Clark vs. Bashir is something I've gone back and forth on a bunch...but reality is both will play a ton anyways so it doesnt really matter who "starts". I think Clark ultimately starts with the chemistry he has with Dent already, but I mean you gotta play Bashir a lot when he's draining 3's because he's one of those instant scorers that can flip a game or put a game away pretty quick when he's on. The 26 he dropped on UCF was a thing of beauty. On the flip side the 1 for 10 from 3 against McNeese made that a close game probably :lol: