diddlydawg7

You know we already have a thread right? We have one everyday....

This has been awful to watch. I think we did too much shuffling in the bullpen, should’ve stuck with Caldwell or Pasqua....

Seems I jinxed us...

#WeRunThisState ...

[quote]Charlie Goldstein records an immaculate inning for the Dawgs at Kennesaw State: 9 pitches, 9 strikes, 3 Ks [/quote] Holy shite. I didn’t start watching until the 5th pitch I had no idea. ...

Freshman Charlie Goldstein strikes out the side. ...

[quote]LOL - I mean at this point it's hard for any ranking to be accurate because there isn't enough cross-pollination between teams. I do like ELO in baseball and basketball, though.[/quote] Which was my point from the start. No rankings are necessarily super accurate right now, but ELO giv...

[quote]you may want to tell that to the selection committee then, bud. Because RPI is the computer model they still use in baseball. [/quote] There’s nothing wrong with using RPI at the end of the regular season. [quote]And is it "trash" because you read that somewhere or can you explain why, ...

[quote]Does everyone start with the same ELO?[/quote] No. Which is why it’s better than RPI at this point.[quote]Are the jumps and falls bigger at the beginning and decrease the more data points available? I play a lot of chess, and that’s how it works on chess.com[/quote] I do not know....

[quote]Absolutely. I also wonder why he chooses ELO for baseball when they still use RPI on the committee.[/quote] Dude you are super thick. RPI is trash right now. I specifically said ELO is only better before we get a couple weeks into conference play. I’ll use RPI once it gets settled....

[quote]I’m not sure how ELO works. Is UCF higher because they beat Ole Miss 2/3? [/quote] [quote]The performance in the ELO system, as with the Harkness system, [b]is not measured in absolute terms. It is inferred from wins, losses, and draws against other players.[/b] Players’ ratings depend on...

[quote]Maybe show me another SOS computer model ranking instead of ignoring one put in front of you because you don't like what it has to say. to you.[/quote] It’s like you never even read my posts :lol: My entire point is that ELO is far better than other computer models, especially RPI. ...

LSU down 0-2 B3...

Also, ELO Ranks of opponents: [u]Ole Miss[/u] #10 TCU #12 Texas Tech #19 Texas #33 UCF #33 UCF #33 UCF #92 Memphis #209 Arkansas State [u]MSU[/u] #10 TCU #12 Texas Tech #19 Texas #44 Tulane #44 Tulane #44 Tulane #199 Jackson St ...

That’s RPI Strength of Schedule :lol: ...

Damn he lost like 30 pounds in a week. Still got some arm flab though....

ELO Rankings are generally almost as accurate as any Top 25 poll can be at this point in the season. In fact, the ELO rankings are super similar to the current Top 25 polls. It’s not like RPI where the #1 team is a 7-8 Northern Idaho team for the first 4 weeks. At this point in the season, no...

[quote]I wouldn't put much stock in the ELO or any computer model until we have a little bit more data to go on. [/quote] Obviously, but it’s better than nothing. ...

[quote]UCF and Tulane are probably about even[/quote] UCF is 33 in ELO. Tulane is 44. [quote]UCF was 1-3, dropping a series to FAU[/quote] FAU is 38 in ELO. They are pretty good. [quote]Tulane lost a very close, heated series with a good team in ULL[/quote] ULL is 42 in ELO. So li...

Ole Miss has played a tougher schedule than Moo State...