Started By
Message

re: League presidents to vote on new SEC schedule today (June 1)

Posted on 6/1/12 at 8:43 am to
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
65520 posts
Posted on 6/1/12 at 8:43 am to
it's simple,put Bama and auburn in the East, Mizzou and A&M in the West, and everybody keeps there rivalry. That is the MOST IMPORTANT THING, RIVALRYS!

If you aren't for that, you're a scared p*ssy.
This post was edited on 6/1/12 at 8:44 am
Posted by parkjas2001
Gustav Fan Club: Consigliere
Member since Feb 2010
45000 posts
Posted on 6/1/12 at 8:46 am to
quote:

it's simple,put Bama and auburn in the East, Mizzou and A&M in the West, and everybody keeps there rivalry. That is the MOST IMPORTANT THING, RIVALRYS!

If you aren't for that, you're a scared p*ssy.


Bama, AU, UGA, UT, UF all in one division so LSU doesnt have to play them all...whose scared?
Posted by orangehater
Member since Aug 2011
462 posts
Posted on 6/1/12 at 8:47 am to
I have nothing for this
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
65520 posts
Posted on 6/1/12 at 8:49 am to
Rivalries man. That's what the SEC is all about. Competitive balance does not matter. Why are you scared?
Posted by NorthGwinnettTiger
Member since Jun 2006
53303 posts
Posted on 6/1/12 at 8:50 am to
quote:

Competitive balance does not matter.


Who said this?
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54853 posts
Posted on 6/1/12 at 8:51 am to
quote:

Competitive balance does not matter.
This is a red herring. The 6-2 does not provide competitive balance. In fact, the 6-1-1 is much more competitively balanced. The 6-2 only provides more theoretical scheduling equality over a long period of time. Which is pointless in college football.

Posted by Govt Tide
Member since Nov 2009
9584 posts
Posted on 6/1/12 at 8:53 am to
quote:

League presidents and athletic directors will vote today on the new SEC football scheduling format, and a 6-1-1 plan (six games against division foes, one permanent opponent from the other division and one rotating opponent from the other division) is expected to pass, according to SEC commissioner Mike Slive and the coaches and athletic directors contacted.


I really wish the league would take a little more time to think this out. If all the league presidents/ADs/etc are just a little bit creative then a 6-2-1 (2 rotating, 1 permanent) can be done. It would make the scheduling of OOC games and the ability to ensure no home games are lost a bit more challenging but I think it can be done. The key imho would be somehow making sure Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina have their OOC rivalry games at home the same year and on the road the same year so the rest of their schedules can work out where they won't ever drop below 7 home games in a year. You solve that issue and scheduling for the rest of the league can still be done in a way everyone can be happy with even with a 9 game SEC schedule.

P.S. To clarify my point about UF, UGA, and USCe, I'm talking about those 3 teams playing FSU, G Tech, and Clemson on their home field in years when they have a 4 home/5 away SEC schedule setup and vice versa in years they play those games at the ACC's home field. Of course now that I think of it Kentucky has to be considered as well with their annual games with Louisville and Indiana. It may just be easier to rotate the 4 home/5 away schedule between divisions. One year all SEC East teams have a 5 home game/4 away conference schedule while all SEC West teams have a 4 home/5 away schedule and vice versa the next year. Thoughts?
This post was edited on 6/1/12 at 9:01 am
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
32154 posts
Posted on 6/1/12 at 8:55 am to
quote:

Saban has built and Les has placed LSU in a place where it shouldn't matter who is on the other sideline...on any Saturday. The club should conduct themselves as such, imo.


+1


Someone needs to gag Les.
Posted by allin2010
Auburn
Member since Aug 2011
18494 posts
Posted on 6/1/12 at 8:55 am to
quote:

t's simple,put Bama and auburn in the East, Mizzou and A&M in the West, and everybody keeps there rivalry. That is the MOST IMPORTANT THING, RIVALRYS!


I agree 100%,,, but this is Germans....
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
102449 posts
Posted on 6/1/12 at 8:56 am to
quote:

I mean Florida is not even a nearby state." -CLM


I feel like we should be the ones bitching about this, not Les.
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
65520 posts
Posted on 6/1/12 at 8:56 am to
quote:

The 6-1-1 provides much more competitive balance


For Auburn.

Has anybody totaled up Florida's record as compared with the other SEC East teams since division play began?

I'd also bet big money that Alabama has played Florida in the regular season less than any other SEC West team.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54853 posts
Posted on 6/1/12 at 8:59 am to
quote:

For Auburn.
For everyone. Having the haves play the haves and have nots play each other makes the schedule more balanced.

With the 6-2, there will be years when LSU draws UF and UGA while Bama gets UK and Vanddy. Or UGA will get Ole MIss and MSU in a year when UF draws LSU and Bama. That is not balanced scheduling.

It only balances out over 12 years, which is meaningless.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57013 posts
Posted on 6/1/12 at 8:59 am to
quote:

Has anybody totaled up Florida's record as compared with the other SEC East teams since division play began?


Since 2000

UGA
114-42
4 SEC East Champs
2 SEC Champs

UT
94-57
3 SEC East Champs

UF
115-41
4 SEC East Champs
3 SEC Champs
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54853 posts
Posted on 6/1/12 at 9:02 am to
Can you do AU, LSU and Bama?
Posted by allin2010
Auburn
Member since Aug 2011
18494 posts
Posted on 6/1/12 at 9:03 am to
quote:

I'd also bet big money that Alabama has played Florida in the regular season less than any other SEC West team.


Auburn has played Florida 15 times since expansion...

Alabama has played them 13....(ETA only 6 times in regular season)

ETA: Arkie has played them 8 times
Ole Miss 6
MSU 8 times..

Dang, I hate defending Bama, but these LSU fans are running scared.

LINK
This post was edited on 6/1/12 at 9:12 am
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57013 posts
Posted on 6/1/12 at 9:04 am to
quote:

Can you do AU, LSU and Bama?
, not that quickly. I had it on a scratch paper from a conversation from yesterday. maybe in a minute, I have some work to do
Posted by NorthGwinnettTiger
Member since Jun 2006
53303 posts
Posted on 6/1/12 at 9:05 am to
I'm working on a '92-'11 figure right now. Gimme about 10 minutes.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54853 posts
Posted on 6/1/12 at 9:05 am to
quote:

maybe in a minute, I have some work to do
bullshite. The vote is today. I need stats!
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
65520 posts
Posted on 6/1/12 at 9:05 am to
Nice of you to start at 2000 instead of 1993 when Florida became LSU's permanent opponent.

Even starting with only 2000, it seems
Ike LSU is the only team that has to play TWO multiple BCS Championship winning programs every year. And by your numbers, Bama gets a cupcake as its permanent opponent.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54853 posts
Posted on 6/1/12 at 9:06 am to
quote:

Nice of you to start at 2000 instead of 1993 when Florida became LSU's permanent opponent.

They were also AU's permanent opponent in 1993.

2000 is when it went to the current system.
This post was edited on 6/1/12 at 9:07 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter