Started By
Message
re: Its not about pro players playing, not about a sarcastic remark. But you all know that
Posted on 9/8/26 at 3:02 pm to Scruffy
Posted on 9/8/26 at 3:02 pm to Scruffy
quote:
The NCAA deemed him ineligible, therefore the SEC deems him ineligible.
Not exactly. He is eligible by the SECs rules. Currently he is ineligible due to reasons other than 5 for 5.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 3:02 pm to TexasOnTop
quote:
No matter how many times you repeat yourself over and over, it will not change these facts.
They are not facts, they are your opinions.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 3:03 pm to TexasOnTop
quote:The SEC has already stated that they will respect the eligibility rules of the NCAA, therefore he is ineligible.
He is eligible by the SECs rules.
He shouldn’t be rostered.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 3:03 pm to stuckintexas
quote:
They are not facts, they are your opinions.
With the SEC, agreeing with my interpretation I'd say they're pretty close to facts for the time being.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 3:06 pm to Scruffy
quote:
The SEC has already stated that they will respect the eligibility rules of the NCAA, therefore he is ineligible.
He shouldn’t be rostered.
He is ineligible due to the NCAA currently. Once they clear him, he will be eligible.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 3:07 pm to TexasOnTop
quote:
With the SEC, agreeing with my interpretation I'd say they're pretty close to facts for the time being
Again, for the love of God, neither your interpretation nor the SEC's interpretation mean jack shite.
The SEC should have done a better job writing their new rules with clarity instead of hastily throwing something together. It's their own fault they even need to be interpreted.
The courts decisions have made that clear.
Either we can agree on that fact and continue having a discussion, or you can be on the level of Boom33 obtuse.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 3:07 pm to TexasOnTop
So, rostering him is breaking the rules.
This isn’t complicated.
This isn’t complicated.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 3:08 pm to Mike da Tigah
quote:
A player who is paid for his work
Newsflash 99% of college athletes are already paid for their work
Posted on 9/8/26 at 3:12 pm to John somers
No matter the cause they pissed someone with power off. They are obviously looking to scare or get rid of (not likely) LSU for a reason and it's not because they fear Kiffin or them winning.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 3:13 pm to John somers
quote:
Its about LSU orchestrating a campaign to convince former NFL players to sue for extra college eligibility.
Just like everyone else, you’re making that statement, and I’m simply curious whether there’s any concrete, undisputable evidence to support it beyond the CBS report. So far, I haven’t seen anyone on this board provide any firsthand statements or documentation that actually backs up these claims.
I’m not saying the information is necessarily wrong. I’m just wondering if there’s something more substantial out there that I’m missing. If there is, I’d certainly be interested in seeing it.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 3:13 pm to John somers
quote:Proof?
Its about LSU orchestrating a campaign to convince former NFL players to sue for extra college eligibility.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 3:13 pm to Scruffy
quote:
So, rostering him is breaking the rules.
Not if the NCAA is allowing him to be rostered until he's cleared
Posted on 9/8/26 at 4:10 pm to tschla1
quote:
Newsflash 99% of college athletes are already paid for their work
Newsflash.. that was the point. Congratulations
Posted on 9/8/26 at 4:16 pm to Mac
quote:
How can you not see the GIANT difference between NFL minicamp participant and NFL training camp participant
I can see it, just like I could see a difference between a player who was injured all through camp (Harris) and one who played in preseason games but was cut (Plyburn, had he not been picked up by the Chiefs).
However, those are not differences any court has made in granting their injunctions against the NCAA.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 10:57 pm to John somers
What is the saying.."frick around and find out"
Popular
Back to top

1






