Started By
Message
re: Is there a way for this situation to end peacefully?
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:14 am to ColoradoAg
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:14 am to ColoradoAg
quote:
It isn't going to be dropped. Do you think the other 15 members are just going to change their stance and issue LSU a hall pass? Not likely. Start with boycotts. And if that doesn't take care of it, expel the trouble makers.
33% of those 15 members have already signed a former “pro”.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:14 am to GentlemanTiger
Sankey Drawn and Quartered
Every feckless, hypocritical AD at any school who has ever had a player aspire or play (Alabama) on a pro roster publicly flogged
"pro" defined as someone who has made actual Pro Roster.
Every feckless, hypocritical AD at any school who has ever had a player aspire or play (Alabama) on a pro roster publicly flogged
"pro" defined as someone who has made actual Pro Roster.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:15 am to ColoradoAg
Let me see if I’m keeping up with LSU fan points.
Sankey will be fired.
SEC federal lawsuit will be tossed.
We have to follow the law.
Good luck with all those thoughts.
Sankey will be fired.
SEC federal lawsuit will be tossed.
We have to follow the law.
Good luck with all those thoughts.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:15 am to CatfishJohn
quote:
The easiest, BY FAR, is SEC drops their lawsuit, these players play under TRO like Chambliss, the NCAA and conferences change the threshold for pro to "you must withdraw your name from the draft ahead of deadline" going forward, and we all move on and this is never an issue again.
If a school can find a local judge to overrule SEC rules then it would be an issue again…
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:16 am to Boom33
quote:
If the SEC loses the case, then conferences will basically cease to exist because they will have lost all autonmony.
It will be a wild west of free agency without any real rules.
So? It’s already Wild West free agency without any rules.
The SEC allowed Ole Miss to recruit a player that was enrolled and in classes at Clemson.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:17 am to bluestem75
quote:
This is going to be very hard for the SEC to prove especially after yesterday when they couldn’t define their own rules in testimony. The SEC bylaws do not supersede court orders.
The burden of proof is on the SEC and they must prove that no other school engaged in the same behavior.
I'm just not sure how else to explain it to you guys, but the court case is not just another edibility case at a higher level.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:17 am to RB10
quote:
So? It’s already Wild West free agency without any rules.
The SEC allowed Ole Miss to recruit a player that was enrolled and in classes at Clemson.
Did Ole Miss force a rule change that made that legal for everyone?
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:19 am to wadewilson
quote:
You keep repeating this like it actually means something.
The lawsuit will be tossed or dropped.
In which case LSU will be removed from the conference.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:19 am to Boom33
quote:
LSU launched a campaign to completely change the rules on who is eligible against the entire conference.
Cite your sources
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:19 am to Boom33
quote:
You caused 100s of players to be eligible against the SECs rules.
Lane and LSU are out here coordinating a massive attack through various lawsuits in various states, with many non football athletes.
That's quite the conspiracy theory.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:19 am to Boom33
No reason to waste any more time explaining it to them. They are choosing to be blinded to justify what they want to happen.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:19 am to ColoradoAg
Holy shite I found you.
Is this the first case of Space Force stolen valor?
Is this the first case of Space Force stolen valor?
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:19 am to AGGIES
quote:
If a school can find a local judge to overrule SEC rules then it would be an issue again…
That is never going to change in general with all rules - see Chambliss. The SEC lawsuit against LSU has nothing to do with that.
And the case the players made this year for their TRO is much easier to defend/win because of the timing of all of this 5/5 crap.
-SEC drops suit
-Players play /rostered (who really TRULY cares about these guys) - LSU is compelled by courts to roster them
-Change definition of pro to "included name or didn't withdraw name for NFL draft" for future years
-Move on
ETA:
I'm responding to the question for the easiest path forward that is most peaceful.
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 11:22 am
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:20 am to John Casey
quote:
Cite your sources
Read the lawsuit.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:20 am to GentlemanTiger
No.
This is the the equivalent of Archduke Ferdinand in Sarajevo.
This is the the equivalent of Archduke Ferdinand in Sarajevo.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:21 am to Boom33
quote:
Did Ole Miss force a rule change that made that legal for everyone?
What rule has LSU forced the SEC to change?
Be specific.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:25 am to Boom33
quote:
LSU launched a campaign to completely change the rules on who is eligible against the entire conference.
Wrong.
40 players sued the NCAA. LSU was interested in 2 of them.
quote:
It wasn't an exception like the ones you mention, it was a large change in rules for the entire conference.
Why not get the conference to enforce rules equally upon everybody all at once?
quote:
You caused 100s of players to be eligible against the SECs rules.
Incorrect.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:26 am to Whentheleveebreaks
You dumbass, neither of you frickwhits can even get basic facts right.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:26 am to RB10
quote:
What rule has LSU forced the SEC to change?
Be specific.
LSU's legal efforts to roster former professional athletes have forced the SEC to defend and enforce its strict rule banning players who have signed professional contracts (such as in the NFL) from returning to college athletics.
All eyes turn to federal court in Alabama as SEC tries again to ban former pros from LSU roster
Popular
Back to top



0





