Started By
Message
I hear all the sec coaches whining about
Posted on 5/26/26 at 6:33 pm
Posted on 5/26/26 at 6:33 pm
How bad things are and nil is not sustainable and maybe sec needs their own rules
Problem is sec teams are causing a lot of the issues
I’m not sure the sec can ever be on the same page anymore
Adding Texas schools was a mistake
Problem is sec teams are causing a lot of the issues
I’m not sure the sec can ever be on the same page anymore
Adding Texas schools was a mistake
4
Posted on 5/26/26 at 6:35 pm to nicholastiger
Lane + LSU drove up the market as much as Texas 
Posted on 5/26/26 at 6:57 pm to nicholastiger
Roy Kramer started it all. The little addition of the seccg changed everything. Most of the AD’s were against it, and according to Kramer it almost fell through several times but he convinced them and it paid off literally. After the success of the ccg cbs gave the sec an insane tv deal. It made the sec the wealthiest athletic conference. And no one else could keep up. Sec spent more on facilities and coaches than anyone else and starting dominating. Other conferences starting mimicking the sec and the college football arms race was on. Once everyone starting tasting all that money there was no going back
Posted on 5/26/26 at 6:58 pm to nicholastiger
The main problem is all the coaches will say they want change and everyone to play by the rules (not just SEC coaches, this applies to basically all Power 2 / Power 4 coaches).
But when they get back onto campus, their drive to win at all costs takes over (which is why they are high level coaches to begin with) and they want to take full advantage of any situation they can. So why not offer a kid more NIL than "allowed" since they won't be punished? Why not tamper with kids since they won't be punished? Why play by the rules when it is significantly to their advantage not to (and arguable to their disadvantage to follow the rules since no one is)?
They all agree there needs to be rules, but individually none really want to follow the current rules.
But when they get back onto campus, their drive to win at all costs takes over (which is why they are high level coaches to begin with) and they want to take full advantage of any situation they can. So why not offer a kid more NIL than "allowed" since they won't be punished? Why not tamper with kids since they won't be punished? Why play by the rules when it is significantly to their advantage not to (and arguable to their disadvantage to follow the rules since no one is)?
They all agree there needs to be rules, but individually none really want to follow the current rules.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 7:00 pm to nicholastiger
Cap the NIL evenly across the board for all teams, repayment of the unearned portion if they leave, and give one free transfer then sit a year for the 2nd.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News