Started By
Message
re: How Would TCU Finish This Year If They Were In The SEC?
Posted on 9/11/17 at 11:50 pm to PantherCity
Posted on 9/11/17 at 11:50 pm to PantherCity
You should know football better than that.
Rushing yards does not prove that a team can pound the ball between the tackles as a lot of those rushing yards in the spread offense are because of the pass.
How the run used to open up the pass in the wishbone the pass now opens up the run in the spread.
But for TCU's benefit they did show quite a few times in that game to be able to control the line of scrimmage
Rushing yards does not prove that a team can pound the ball between the tackles as a lot of those rushing yards in the spread offense are because of the pass.
How the run used to open up the pass in the wishbone the pass now opens up the run in the spread.
But for TCU's benefit they did show quite a few times in that game to be able to control the line of scrimmage
This post was edited on 9/11/17 at 11:53 pm
Posted on 9/11/17 at 11:56 pm to PantherCity
quote:
Patterson is an amazing coach. One of his idols is Nick Saban, and he uses Saban's ideology on toughness and grit. You'll hear him during the spring, talking about Nick Saban and Alabama. About how if you want to be like Alabama, you have to endure like Alabama. Be tough like Alabama. Be focused like Alabama.
Dude puts the Crimson Tide on a pedestal.
Sounds like it, but those things he supposedly mentioned aren't why Alabama is Alabama.
quote:
he doesn't get the star players
Looks like he missed the whole point. You can do everything Alabama does except this and you won't be shite.
quote:
His philosophy is to out-tough the other team. In most cases, they do. Even if they lose.
Yes, a lot of coaches have that philosophy. Probably most of the coaches throughout football history have had that philosophy. Les Miles has that philosophy and it got him five straight losses to Alabama, multiple losses every year to teams with less talent and an unceremonious firing. The 1970s are over, unless you can get talent that is vastly superior to every other team in the country, which Alabama somehow does, yet still loses at least one game a year to a team with inferior talent.
Posted on 9/12/17 at 12:06 am to Nuts4LSU
I do have to say on TCU's and Gary Patterson behalf that he was and will always be a great defensive coach.
His defenses since entering the Big XII may not have been as good but certain schemes like running a nickel as your set D came from Gary Patterson.
I have seen Bama and will see Bama lose to lesser talent so let's not act like talent alone is why Bama is great. Bama is great because of great talent along with excellent coaching.
Saban with 3 and 4 star recruits instead of 4 and 5 would win the SEC more years than not
His defenses since entering the Big XII may not have been as good but certain schemes like running a nickel as your set D came from Gary Patterson.
I have seen Bama and will see Bama lose to lesser talent so let's not act like talent alone is why Bama is great. Bama is great because of great talent along with excellent coaching.
Saban with 3 and 4 star recruits instead of 4 and 5 would win the SEC more years than not
This post was edited on 9/12/17 at 12:10 am
Posted on 9/12/17 at 1:24 am to Not Afraid of Bama
Except, of course, that TCU had more rushing attempts than Bama did. And their run-to-pass percentage is roughly the same.
Granted, Alabama was more effective at running the ball against Fresno than we did against Arkansas. And Alabama is the premiere program in America, and we're just a team that plays hard-nosed football.
But I can see the influence.
Conditioning wise, Ole Miss absolutely wilted against us in the Peach Bowl. Arkansas struggled, as well.
The strength program at TCU is outstanding. Not Bama outstanding, but it's pretty damn good.
Granted, Alabama was more effective at running the ball against Fresno than we did against Arkansas. And Alabama is the premiere program in America, and we're just a team that plays hard-nosed football.
But I can see the influence.
Conditioning wise, Ole Miss absolutely wilted against us in the Peach Bowl. Arkansas struggled, as well.
The strength program at TCU is outstanding. Not Bama outstanding, but it's pretty damn good.
Posted on 9/12/17 at 1:27 am to TCUFan
Hard to tell, it's been a frick fest down here since conference expansion.
Posted on 9/12/17 at 1:31 am to Nuts4LSU
quote:
Looks like he missed the whole point. You can do everything Alabama does except this and you won't be shite.
Except they do win a number of games. I wouldn't say TCU is shite -- they're certainly good enough to beat SEC teams and have -- but everyone knows that programs like Alabama and LSU are the cream of the crop. We'll never be that -- and we know it -- so we have to play to our strengths.
What we don't do is act like we're on the level of the premiere teams in the SEC, when it's obvious that certain schools in your conference are not. We don't want to follow in those footsteps, because all that ever seems to do is get schools caught for cheating or imploding once the meat of the SEC schedule hits them.
TCU will never be on your level. But we might grab a game or two, and certainly trounce the pretenders in your conference. As we've done in the past.
Posted on 9/12/17 at 6:05 am to TCUFan
quote:
How Would TCU Finish This Year If They Were In The SEC?
Middle of the pack. This year. There have been some years they would have finished towards the top. Gary is a really good coach. TCU's problem is talent. They are the inverse of A&M.
quote:
Where would you rank Oklahoma this year if they were in the SEC?
#2.
quote:
Finally, if you could trade out a team in the SEC and take one from the Big12, who would it be?
I'd give the Big12 those worthless SJWs, Mizzou, and take the winningest program of all time, OU.
Posted on 9/12/17 at 7:51 am to PantherCity
quote:
Except they do win a number of games. I wouldn't say TCU is shite --
They are not. TCU is a good program, but trying to play Nick Saban's strategy without Nick Saban's players isn't how they got there.
Posted on 9/12/17 at 8:23 am to Not Afraid of Bama
quote:
I have seen Bama and will see Bama lose to lesser talent so let's not act like talent alone is why Bama is great.
Talent is about 95% of it. And I don't understand why sometimes losing to less talented teams means their talent level isn't why they're a great team. Superior talent should win and usually does. The fact that a coach with superior talent gets outcoached sometimes and loses to a team with less talent doesn't mean his superior talent isn't the main reason for his success.
quote:
Saban with 3 and 4 star recruits instead of 4 and 5 would win the SEC more years than not
No, he would not. He's had nothing but 4-5 star talent at LSU and Alabama and has won 7 SEC titles in 16+ seasons, two of which (2001 and 2015) he needed extreme luck in the form of other teams losing other games (including the wildest 4th-and-25 conversion in decades) just to win his division. Reduce the talent level, and his titles would go down.
Posted on 9/12/17 at 9:05 am to Nuts4LSU
I think TCU could be competitive anywhere but I see them being more of an Arkansas/FL type team who wins the sec once in a while.
OU on the other hand would be Big 2 with Bama. Perennial contenders with stability.
OU on the other hand would be Big 2 with Bama. Perennial contenders with stability.
Posted on 9/12/17 at 9:47 am to TCUFan
Don't bring us in to this...you should be worrying about keeping us from a 3-peat Big 12 title...
Posted on 9/12/17 at 10:00 am to TCUFan
quote:
How Would TCU Finish This Year If They Were In The SEC?
This year? (7-5) - (9-3) depending upon which division and who they were matched up with non-conference wise.
quote:
Also, how would this answer change if TCU went into Stillwater and knocked off OkState who many of the pundits believe is the second best team in the Big12 this year?
No, and I like Oklahoma State this year too. Much like the Big 12 sans Oklahoma, they don't play defense though.
quote:
Where would you rank Oklahoma this year if they were in the SEC?
1 or 2. I'd love to see them play Alabama. I'd actually bet on OU winning.
quote:
Finally, if you could trade out a team in the SEC and take one from the Big12, who would it be?
Missouri for Kansas - just for laughs.
This post was edited on 9/12/17 at 10:01 am
Posted on 9/12/17 at 10:01 am to BigRDawg17
quote:
Don't bring us in to this...you should be worrying about keeping us from a 3-peat Big 12 title...
Be careful. TCU plays OU towards the end of the season and OU will likely have their hands full again. You should be more worried about keeping Baker healthy. The pressure to perform is on OU, not TCU.
Posted on 9/12/17 at 10:49 am to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
Well, let's see. TCU hasn't beaten A&M in over 40 years so...
Well, let's see. Texas A&M hasn't played TCU, ever, while they were a good team under Patterson so...
Posted on 9/12/17 at 10:52 am to Not Afraid of Bama
quote:
Rushing yards does not prove that a team can pound the ball between the tackles as a lot of those rushing yards in the spread offense are because of the pass.

Absolute nonsense. What are you talking about?
Running the damn ball is running the damn ball.
Posted on 9/12/17 at 10:53 am to CharlotteSooner
quote:
Texas A&M hasn't played TCU, ever, while they were a good team under Patterson so
The last time A&M played a Patterson-coached TCU, they won 28-9.
Plus, Kenny Hill has yet to beat a Power 5 team on Kyle Field.
This post was edited on 9/12/17 at 10:54 am
Posted on 9/12/17 at 10:56 am to Boomer00
quote:
I see them being more of an Arkansas/FL type team who wins the sec once in a while.
What?

Posted on 9/12/17 at 11:02 am to CGSC Lobotomy
That was in 2001 when they were a 6-6 team in his 2nd year as HC.
So? He's beating P5 teams on their home field at a better program.

quote:
Plus, Kenny Hill has yet to beat a Power 5 team on Kyle Field.
So? He's beating P5 teams on their home field at a better program.
This post was edited on 9/12/17 at 11:04 am
Popular
Back to top
