Started By
Message
re: ESPN's latest pre-season Top 25
Posted on 5/20/12 at 12:12 am to Tiger Authority
Posted on 5/20/12 at 12:12 am to Tiger Authority
quote:
TE doesn't matter.
It typically does.
quote:
According to rivals is deflecting on a bogus opinion
How was I deflecting a bogus opinion? What part of this is opinion?
quote:
In turn, they don't have much experience behind Honey Badger and Tharold Simon (according to Rivals)
Rivals has 2 redshirt freshmen behind Tharold Simon and Tyrann Mathieu. What other depth chart am I supposed to go by?
quote:
Mingo, Montgomery, Logan, Jones, Minter, Simon, Reid, TM
Mingo didn't start, Ken Adams started opposite Sam Montgomery. Athough, Mingo did play a lot. Still the fact remains, he didn't start. Tharold Simon also didn't start.
quote:
Could easily name several other players such as Anthony Johnson that received significant PT last year.
Significant playing time =/= starting, which is what I stated here:
quote:
You don't return very much on defense when it comes to starters
0
Posted on 5/20/12 at 12:13 am to Tiger Authority
Anyways, I'm done with this argument. I have to feed my dogs and crash so I can actually wake up on time tomorrow.
Posted on 5/20/12 at 12:22 am to LC412000
quote:
AU now has what appears to be a decent OC and a decent DC. They return, what, 9-10 starters on D
9-10 hapless, bumbling idiots
Posted on 5/20/12 at 12:29 am to narddogg81
quote:
9-10 hapless, bumbling idiots
Posted on 5/20/12 at 12:31 am to Rig
[quote]And a 6-6 team will turn everything that went wrong to right. I'll believe it when I see it.[/quote
fo sho
fo sho
Posted on 5/20/12 at 1:02 am to TTsTowel
quote:
LSU downgrades at tight end
You just lost all credibility whatsoever with this statement. Barring a couple catches, Peterson was virtually nonexistent in our offense.
Posted on 5/20/12 at 1:17 am to TTsTowel
It's a preseason poll. I've never seen a fanbase whine so much over such a meaningless poll.
Posted on 5/20/12 at 1:26 am to gatordmb89
quote:2004 will do that to ya…
It's a preseason poll. I've never seen a fanbase whine so much over such a meaningless poll.
And most of the whining isn't over the poll, it's over the fact that people don't see any way Auburn could progress and improve
Posted on 5/20/12 at 1:31 am to AUin02
quote:
7. Florida State The new Notre Dame? What is with ESPN's obsession with this team...
Florida State will have a good defense again but they need to find a running game in order to something. They have been beating themselves for years anyway, they gotta be one of the penalized teams in the country.
Posted on 5/20/12 at 2:26 am to LooseCannon22282
Why do Auburn fans think they have all this talent? Is it because rivals has rated their classes high. Talented teams don't get their shite pushed in by 4 tds multiple times in one season. Ted roof was a failure because he didn't have much to work with.
The young excuse is old now. If kids are truly talented they can come in and make an immediate impact. Auburns has not had a lot if kids that have done that.
In 08 Bama only had 9Srs. and all the talented players were Fr and Sophs. they win 12 games.
Most of LSU best players were Sophs last yr and freshman the yr before when they won 11 games.
Auburn does not have close to the talent or depth regardless of where rivals ranked those classes.
The young excuse is old now. If kids are truly talented they can come in and make an immediate impact. Auburns has not had a lot if kids that have done that.
In 08 Bama only had 9Srs. and all the talented players were Fr and Sophs. they win 12 games.
Most of LSU best players were Sophs last yr and freshman the yr before when they won 11 games.
Auburn does not have close to the talent or depth regardless of where rivals ranked those classes.
Posted on 5/20/12 at 4:03 am to RollTide1987
I think Bama is ranked too high.
Outside top 10 IMO. Arkansas, USCe and LSU will all spank them this year.
Outside top 10 IMO. Arkansas, USCe and LSU will all spank them this year.
Posted on 5/20/12 at 8:43 am to BhamDore
Posted on 5/20/12 at 8:46 am to RollTide1987
quote:
7. Florida State
Again, with this shite
quote:
11. Michigan State
Meh, could be lower, actually. Lost quite a bit of talent.
quote:
20. Florida
Figured, they'd possibly round out the T25, but close enough
Posted on 5/20/12 at 8:47 am to RollTide1987
I'm surprised they didn't put USC number one
Posted on 5/20/12 at 8:55 am to harmonics
quote:
Everyone outside of the top 3 is ranked too high...
Not that I don't agree for the most part, but who should you put in their place?
Posted on 5/20/12 at 9:04 am to RollTide1987
1)LSU
2)BAMA
3)USC Switched bc I'm not buying all the hype. They'll be good, but not our level. Jmo
4)Oklahome
5)WVU
6) Oregon
7)scar
8)Michigan
9)scar
10)arky
11)Ohio st
12) Georgia
13)Florida st
14)Clemson
15)Wisconsin
Hard to determine after the top 10 bc those teams aren't much different @ 10-25. It then comes down to schedules. I still firmly believe USC is a solid 3 bc they aren't at the level of LSU/Bama but there's no other dynamic team.
2)BAMA
3)USC Switched bc I'm not buying all the hype. They'll be good, but not our level. Jmo
4)Oklahome
5)WVU
6) Oregon
7)scar
8)Michigan
9)scar
10)arky
11)Ohio st
12) Georgia
13)Florida st
14)Clemson
15)Wisconsin
Hard to determine after the top 10 bc those teams aren't much different @ 10-25. It then comes down to schedules. I still firmly believe USC is a solid 3 bc they aren't at the level of LSU/Bama but there's no other dynamic team.
Posted on 5/20/12 at 9:07 am to AMM AU9893
quote:
Nobody thought Cam was going to be any good that year.
Everyone thought he would be good, no one thought he would lead the SEC in rushing.
Posted on 5/20/12 at 9:07 am to RBWilliams8
I'm still not sold on USC being a #2 team...maybe top 10..and I got to watch them quite a bit last year.
Posted on 5/20/12 at 9:09 am to RBWilliams8
quote:
1)LSU
2)BAMA
3)USC Switched bc I'm not buying all the hype. They'll be good, but not our level. Jmo
4)Oklahome
5)WVU
6) Oregon
7)scar
8)Michigan
9)scar
10)arky
11)Ohio st
12) Georgia
13)Florida st
14)Clemson
15)Wisconsin
im not sold on S. Carolina being the #7 and #9 team. they're just not that good
imo. maybe #11 and #14
This post was edited on 5/20/12 at 9:14 am
Posted on 5/20/12 at 9:17 am to RollTide1987
How can they rate Fla # 20? I don't see that.
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News