bottagetta80

quote:

---

aTm could have success in the SEC. I just don't understand why they didn't have more in the Big 12 the last decade.

---

I agree, They definitely have the resources to be successful, more so than a couple of SEC schools prior to their joining of the CONF.

wow.

quote:

---

My first impression is that Starkville is a shithole that must be avoided at all costs.

---

:pimp:

Wow - aTm above UGA and UF...not a flame, but didn't expect that.

[quote]And a 6-6 team will turn everything that went wrong to right. I'll believe it when I see it.[/quote


fo sho

Arky needs to be in that bunch prob above AU/LSU imo.

quote:

---

A young OL in front won't make that easy..

---

That's my biggest fear. I believe KF (if declared starter) has playmaking ability, but it will be extremely tough if he doesn't have time. The WR corp should be a the teams biggest strength with exception of the DL.

quote:

---

are we talking all athletics or just football?

---

I'd say a toss-up between Tenn / LSU.

quote:

---

I feel like I've seen alot of articles/posts/writings talking about the inherent problems with the selection process for a four team play off.

My thought (for what it's worth) is to just go straight to a 8 team playoff (maybe less). Take the Champs of 6 AQ conferences plus two "wild Cards"

I personally would vote for taking away the Big East's AQ status. Idk who I'd give it to though.

What do you guys think? (of the idea over all, and who you think should get the Big East's AQ status if you would take it away)

I know it probably wouldn't get implemented anywhere in the near future, but I can dream can't I?

---

I'm not a fan of the playoff system; however, your idea isn't that bad if a playoff system is inevitable.

quote:

---

I'm more worried about winning the Kentucky game than the Auburn game. Auburn doesn't scare me at all this year. When we beat them, I won't even brag-it'll be roughly the same as beating UAB.

---

Surely you jest.