Started By
Message
Did SEC teams recruiting/taking athletes back from NFL minicamps that then turned around
Posted on 8/27/26 at 3:25 pm
Posted on 8/27/26 at 3:25 pm
and voted against taking kids back from NFL minicamps open themselves up to lawsuits for misleading these athletes when they never intended to allow them back?
Why did they recruit and accept their commitments and then vote to ban them?
Why did they recruit and accept their commitments and then vote to ban them?
Posted on 8/27/26 at 3:26 pm to olgoi khorkhoi
Thats why lsu didnt vote imo.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 3:26 pm to olgoi khorkhoi
Definitely infringed on their right to work.
Sankey should be sued directly
Sankey should be sued directly
Posted on 8/27/26 at 3:27 pm to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
Thats why lsu didnt vote imo.
Well they voted that it shouldn't be allowed. They just didn't vote on the penalties aspect.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 3:28 pm to OleVaught14
The penalties aspect is all that matters.
Without these penalties they are like the pirates code……more like guidelines really
Without these penalties they are like the pirates code……more like guidelines really
Posted on 8/27/26 at 3:31 pm to olgoi khorkhoi
Yep, and that's why I've been saying that LSU will likely face a lawsuit if they back out of any agreement with these ex-NFL players. LSU has backed themselves into a corner over this stupidity.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 3:36 pm to olgoi khorkhoi
LSU took a match and burned up millions in NIL payments.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 3:48 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
Definitely infringed on their right to work.
Sankey should be sued directly
What the frick are you talking about?
Does this mean I should sue any company who doesn't hire me because they've infringed on my right to work?
Where can I find the details of this "right"?
This post was edited on 8/27/26 at 3:49 pm
Posted on 8/27/26 at 3:52 pm to olgoi khorkhoi
They can go to other confs.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 3:53 pm to Boom33
quote:
What the frick are you talking about?
Does this mean I should sue any company who doesn't hire me because they've infringed on my right to work?
Where can I find the details of this "right"?
So if 16 of the top companies in your industry decided to collude and blacklist you in defiance of a court order, you'd be cool with that?
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:03 pm to clamdip
quote:
So if 16 of the top companies in your industry decided to collude and blacklist you in defiance of a court order, you'd be cool with that?
I would be against a court thinking it has the authority to tell a company it has to hire me to start with.
So yes, 100%.
Private businesses should be able to hire whoever they want for any reason they want.
It's not a coincidence that as lawyers and courts got involved things went to shite.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:10 pm to clamdip
quote:
So if 16 of the top companies in your industry decided to collude and blacklist you in defiance of a court order, you'd be cool with that?
I wouldn’t have much ground to stand on if there were 60 similar companies that didn’t collude, plus an additional 32 companies who also didn’t collude.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:11 pm to Boom33
quote:
I would be against a court thinking it has the authority to tell a company it has to hire me to start with.
So yes, 100%.
Private businesses should be able to hire whoever they want for any reason they want.
Oh, so you're a moron.
1. The court is not forcing a team to hire a player. They are forcing the NCAA to rule a group of players eligible. The SEC is now trying to scramble and rule those players ineligible.
2. Private businesses haven't since at least the 1960s had the freedom to hire (or not hire) whoever they want for any reason they want. There are these things called discrimination laws.
But keep living in la la land.
This post was edited on 8/27/26 at 4:13 pm
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:11 pm to Pickle_Weasel
quote:
Yep, and that's why I've been saying that LSU will likely face a lawsuit if they back out of any agreement with these ex-NFL players. LSU has backed themselves into a corner over this stupidity.
Keep yapping
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:16 pm to Boom33
quote:
Private businesses should be able to hire whoever they want for any reason they want.
Oddly enough, there are several companies that want to hire these people, but are not being allowed to and threatened with punishment if they do. I agree with you that they should be able to hire them.
I think they were coerced into voting a certain way. Their true intentions were made known when they recruited these athletes and either signed them or attempted to sign them.
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:16 pm to Adam Banks
Your political takes are retarded and your football takes are somehow worse. Congrats!
Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:25 pm to Adam Banks
Congrats on your latest appearance on Message Board Geniuses.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 8/27/26 at 4:34 pm to Crowknowsbest
quote:
wouldn’t have much ground to stand on if there were 60 similar companies that didn’t collude, plus an additional 32 companies who also didn’t collude.
In addition, you'd be looked upon more favorably if you hadn't have played professionally in the NFL.
Popular
Back to top


5







