Started By
Message
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:54 am to LSUcajun77
quote:
Which fan base claims this guy?
He's a Tennessee VOL.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:55 am to gamecockman12
quote:It goes both ways.
LSU needs the SEC a lot more than the SEC needs LSU. That being said I hope they stay.
LSU is top 5-6 in national viewership numbers.
They were that high last year when they sucked.
To think the SEC wouldn’t suffer from kicking them out is wild, IMO.
Would LSU suffer more? Probably, but the cost to the SEC would be big.
And despite people claiming on here that other conferences wouldn’t pick them up, we all know that’s untrue.
The ACC would probably leap at that.
LSU would have a weaker schedule in conference too.
Would make NC runs easier.
Hell, maybe they should push for that.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:56 am to poncho villa
You can’t read this and believe what you’re saying. That’s next level retarded.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:57 am to stout
Ya know, looking at the list, I think LSU is fricked.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:58 am to The Baker
quote:
I predict:
Ole Miss
Tennessee (for some weird reason they're all riled up)
Alabama
Texas a&m
BAMA and LSU as institutions have good relations, I doubt that
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:59 am to The Baker
quote:Bama will not vote LSU out
Ole Miss
Tennessee (for some weird reason they're all riled up)
Alabama
Texas a&m
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:04 pm to stout
Not a single school will vote to remove LSU from the SEC.
A. It is just stupid to consider removing a founding member that brings great financial gain to the conference over some temporary issues and egos.
B. Alongside it hurting the conference from the loss of LSU, the better course for the conference, assuming they want them gone, which they don't, would be to punish them and make the University and its fans so pissed off and isolated that they leave. Then, the SEC keeps their media rights until 2034 and gets paid for them to exit.
That said, neither will happen. It is just posturing nonsense and a waste of resources. Time to move forward. Message sent that the Conference majority will is the rule, and likely, the message is received. If not, maybe things actually get more real in the future, but not now.
A. It is just stupid to consider removing a founding member that brings great financial gain to the conference over some temporary issues and egos.
B. Alongside it hurting the conference from the loss of LSU, the better course for the conference, assuming they want them gone, which they don't, would be to punish them and make the University and its fans so pissed off and isolated that they leave. Then, the SEC keeps their media rights until 2034 and gets paid for them to exit.
That said, neither will happen. It is just posturing nonsense and a waste of resources. Time to move forward. Message sent that the Conference majority will is the rule, and likely, the message is received. If not, maybe things actually get more real in the future, but not now.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:05 pm to Che Boludo
If it gets to a vote, I think LSU is cooked....
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:07 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Would LSU suffer more? Probably, but the cost to the SEC would be big
LSU would suffer a lot more. The loss of the revenue from the TV contract alone would be huge. The SEC could add FSU or North Carolina and not miss a beat from a national interest perspective. It's insane that it's even being discussed at this point. I just think Sankey had his feelings hurt because LSU embarrassed him in court.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:07 pm to The Baker
quote:
Tennessee (for some weird reason they're all riled up)
You honestly don't know why they hate Lane?
I'm pretty sure the 2 Texas schools would vote with Ole Miss and Tennessee. This would underscore the amazing level of hypocrisy in Austin, btw.
Seriously doubt Bama would vote to expel a charter member over Sankey being butthurt and embarrassed.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:08 pm to The Baker
quote:
I predict...Alabama
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:16 pm to gamecockman12
quote:
I just think Sankey had his feelings hurt because LSU embarrassed him in court.
If he wasn’t so stupid it wouldn’t hav happened and that’s what all of this is about.
Sanky gettin ready to get the sec fricked does any body think at the end of the day LSU is just gonna let this dick get away with this shite without a fight.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:18 pm to VFL67
quote:
No one is gonna vote to remove them. This is all about showing the conference is bigger than a single school
Nah, you don’t go to court to do something you already have the power to do.
The SEC is making sure LSU won’t challenge the vote in a Louisiana court of law. If they weren’t serious, they wouldn’t be seeking to block any legal action by LSU.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:47 pm to Insurancerebel
quote:
There is an unwritten rule in Congress - never call for the vote unless you have the votes.
Well, I think there is something to this. Sankey isn’t going into a vote blind. He’s been seeking consensus behind the scenes. How devastating would it be for SEC rules enforcement if he held a vote and it failed. The Wild West would get even wilder.
All that said, LSU isn’t going anywhere. There will be some type of compromise reached. Likely LSU will agree to not roster players who have “signed contracts” with professional sports teams and this will all go away.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:53 pm to poncho villa
You been in Kiffens stuff again ?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:55 pm to The Baker
quote:
I sincerely hope the vote tally gets released publicly. I predict: Ole Miss Tennessee (for some weird reason they're all riled up) Alabama Texas a&m I think... or i'd hope UGA UF Auburn MSST Texas would have our backs with the remainder abstaining.
Is this the bartering stage of grief?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 12:56 pm to stout
LSU better hope for late mail in ballots
Posted on 9/8/26 at 1:01 pm to poncho villa
quote:And y’all’s coach and administration are acting like it. Which is why you’re in the position you’re in
SEC isn't bigger than LSU LSU runs the SEC with social media, trophies, and swag.
Back to top


0




