CelticTiger
| Favorite team: | Missouri |
| Location: | Saint Louis |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 1528 |
| Registered on: | 2/5/2019 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Help Needed: Gameday Guide for Columbia, Missouri
Posted by CelticTiger on 11/11/25 at 4:49 pm to BobLeeDagger
W/r/t tailgating, walking down the road between Lots N and M (refer to previously posted map) and venturing into those lots may give you the best opportunity to interact with Mizzou fans and snag a drink or two. I park in Lot K and drive that road every game. Always plenty of activity!
re: NIL Cap. It won't mean what you think it means
Posted by CelticTiger on 11/5/25 at 1:19 pm to nicholastiger
Regarding collectives, I just don't get how they operate going forward. At one point the CSC essentially outlawed collectives for failing to meet the "valid business purpose" test. Challenged, they reached a settlement allowing collective NIL payments as long as the athlete is promoting "for profit" goods or services to the public.
So in practice...I, an individual donor, wish to contribute a measly $100 to a collective that contracts with athletes attending my school. The athlete then must promote or provide for profit goods or services. I see how this might work out if I was a business owner and the athlete agreed to tweet positive things about my business. But I don't own a business. What "for profit" activity is the athlete performing for ME for my $100 contribution?
Or do collectives no longer solicit or accept contributions from individuals like me?
So in practice...I, an individual donor, wish to contribute a measly $100 to a collective that contracts with athletes attending my school. The athlete then must promote or provide for profit goods or services. I see how this might work out if I was a business owner and the athlete agreed to tweet positive things about my business. But I don't own a business. What "for profit" activity is the athlete performing for ME for my $100 contribution?
Or do collectives no longer solicit or accept contributions from individuals like me?
re: For skeptics of the new NIL/Portal of College Football
Posted by CelticTiger on 11/4/25 at 11:19 pm to 3down10
quote:
Go look at recruiting rankings and it's basically the same as always. Vandy has about the same rankings as 2015. So do schools like Arkansas who is much worse than Vandy right now. Arkansas is about a 22ish ranked class most year, and Vandy around 40-50.
But are you taking into consideration portal rankings which arguably have a greater immediate impact on improving a team?
Someone mentioned Ole Miss and Mizzou harping on this. Well, in 2024 Ole Miss had the #1 transfer ranking per 24/7 and Mizzou #13. For 2025, Ole Miss was #4 and Mizzou #7. You keep that up and you can elevate a team pretty quick.
Can’t really explain Vandy’s improvement tho. They were #39 and #36 respectively in the two years, or pretty close to their usual recruiting rankings.
re: Missouri Fans, what is up with this QB?
Posted by CelticTiger on 11/4/25 at 6:24 pm to Tantal
quote:
Mizzou posters keep assuring me that Zollers is actually better than Pribula. I didn't actually watch him play after Pribula went down, so I don't know.
Sample size is WAY too small to make that determination.
The ironic thing, considering the theme of this thread, is I thought he looked much more confident and comfortable in the huddle and during the snap count than Pribula. The eye thing is interesting, but I don’t think it was fear!
re: A 3rd string true freshman quarterback vs. 8-0 A&M.
Posted by CelticTiger on 11/4/25 at 6:12 pm to QBUMizzou
quote:
The stars seemed aligned in A&M’s favor.
I’m not expecting a win, but I will be there nonetheless.
Finding a bright spot, I’ll be looking forward to what the kid can do. He’s our future supposedly.
re: Florida has their Coach. Drink (prestige)
Posted by CelticTiger on 10/30/25 at 11:09 pm to theCAW
quote:
Drink will back out once he sees the negative reaction the fans would have if he were announced
Grow up :lol: This is big boy business! Drink ain’t scouring message boards to see if people like him! He’s scouring contract provisions!
re: SEC Heavyweights: Vandy vs Mizzou
Posted by CelticTiger on 10/24/25 at 11:59 pm to TigerLunatik
Don’t understand what you think is not a “heavyweight tilt” about the game. A top ten team with a shot at the CFP versus a fifteenth ranked team with similar aspirations, the loser of which is essentially eliminated from consideration.
Your bias exposes your lack of understanding about what constitutes a good college football matchup and by extension your understanding of college football in general.
If it hurts your feelings less, focus on the fact that the text doesn’t say the TEAMS are heavyweights, it says the MATCHUP has a “heavyweight tilt”, which in fact it does.
Your bias exposes your lack of understanding about what constitutes a good college football matchup and by extension your understanding of college football in general.
If it hurts your feelings less, focus on the fact that the text doesn’t say the TEAMS are heavyweights, it says the MATCHUP has a “heavyweight tilt”, which in fact it does.
re: Missouri @ Vandy who you got?
Posted by CelticTiger on 10/20/25 at 3:14 pm to crimsoncoded94
IF we beat Vandy and IF we go 10-2, one of those final wins needs to be TAMU to make the playoffs. Beating Vandy and OU but losing to A&M won’t get MU in the CFP with a crowded SEC 10-2 field.
re: What are Missouri fans so proud of?
Posted by CelticTiger on 10/19/25 at 11:27 pm to tBrand
quote:
that the SEC invited them, honestly. can't blame them, they hit the jackpot. they might as well be Iowa State and they somehow backdoored their way into the fricking SEC
Tell us you don’t have a clue about the business case for the addition without telling us.
re: OU has 45 National Championships and Missouri has 2
Posted by CelticTiger on 10/16/25 at 11:28 pm to SoCalSoonerGrad
quote:
45-2 in all sports OU vs Missouri. Missouri cant talk smack
Random and quite odd!
I have to admit tho I’m intrigued about which brain cell synapse caused you to find this imperative to share. :dunno:
re: One thing is for sure, can’t call him DeBoring anymore
Posted by CelticTiger on 10/14/25 at 11:40 pm to crimsoncoded94
Losing close against a good team means NOTHING. Look at the 2022 game against UGA. Led the #1 team for most of the game. Finished 6-7.
Not saying we can’t still beat some decent teams, only saying you gotta start doing it! We still know nothing about what this team can do!
Not saying we can’t still beat some decent teams, only saying you gotta start doing it! We still know nothing about what this team can do!
re: Close
Posted by CelticTiger on 10/11/25 at 10:06 pm to MizzouBS
Pribula…anytime the camera went tight on him you could see it in his eyes!
re: I Hope Zollers is Legit
Posted by CelticTiger on 10/11/25 at 9:58 pm to GalacticaCannon
Grew to like Cook after a rough start. Put his heart and soul into every game, but I always viewed him as kinda a bridge to that elite QB that was going to take MU even further. It appears we are still looking.
Corollary…MU deficient in QB development?
Corollary…MU deficient in QB development?
re: The Bama- Mizzou game Carries an interesting conundrum or dilemma for LSU
Posted by CelticTiger on 10/10/25 at 11:36 pm to UnclePat76
quote:
Mizzou can’t beat ranked teams. End of story.
Drinkwitz is 5-5 against ranked opposition since 2023, which gives him as many or more wins against ranked foes in that span than Lane Kiffin (4-3), Brent Venables (3-6), Brian Kelly (3-7), Billy Napier (4-11), and Josh Heupel (4-6), among others. That’s a rough data point for the “Drink doesn’t win big games” crowd.
LINK
Doesn’t really seem like the end of the story.
re: Do you bring your dog to games
Posted by CelticTiger on 10/10/25 at 12:12 pm to Harlan County USA
Ain't nothing wrong with "dog people" only stupid dog people.
My two consecutive yellow labs Hunter and Stryker were a joy in my life. Preferred their company to a number of humans.
Actually, I got a problem with people who don't like dogs!
My two consecutive yellow labs Hunter and Stryker were a joy in my life. Preferred their company to a number of humans.
Actually, I got a problem with people who don't like dogs!
re: Thinking of putting a lot on Bama -3 due to past history with Missou (blowouts)
Posted by CelticTiger on 10/9/25 at 8:16 pm to QuantraviousJefferso
Hey, bet the house if you’re feeling it. Just not sure the relevance of a 2012 game in your decision making. Maybe 2024, but even then, a lot of different personnel on both sides.
re: Missouri is the Bud Light of SEC teams
Posted by CelticTiger on 10/9/25 at 12:41 pm to FAT SEXY
Clearly, this deserves its own thread, witty title and all.
Thanks for posting!
Thanks for posting!
re: Arrogant, old school SEC types
Posted by CelticTiger on 10/9/25 at 12:34 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
Saturday’s outcome changes nothing. Either would have one conference loss and still be in the mix.
I don't give two shits about blue bloods and old guard and crap like that.
This is a big game for Mizzou because of the 4 really tough teams remaining on our schedule, 2 are at home and 2 on the road. Beat Bama and one of A&M (home) or OU (road) and take care of business where favored on the rest (including a tough road contest at Vandy) and a 10-2 Mizzou has a great resume for the playoffs.
This isn't the end of anything, but it's a great beginning for this season (which is the only thing I'm concerned about at this point)!
re: I’d love to be wrong about Mizzou…
Posted by CelticTiger on 10/9/25 at 12:07 pm to Nasty_Canasta
quote:
Missouri kills people with the taxes more than Illinois.
Short version: Illinois takes a much bigger bite than Missouri.
Total state + local tax burden (share of personal income):
Missouri: 7.83% (ranked 39th-lowest) vs Illinois: 10.22% (7th-highest). Breakdown:
• MO ˜ 2.31% property, 2.59% income, 2.93% sales/excise.
• IL ˜ 3.81% property, 2.63% income, 3.78% sales/excise.
WalletHub
Property taxes: This is where Illinois really stings; its property-tax burden is among the nation’s highest, while Missouri’s is notably lower. (WalletHub’s burden components above.) For effective rates by state, see the 2025 property-tax comparison.
WalletHub
+1
Estate/“death” taxes:
• Illinois imposes a state estate tax with a $4,000,000 exclusion (not portable).
• Missouri imposes no state estate or inheritance tax (none since 2005).
Illinois Attorney General +2
If you want the accountant’s bottom line: for the same income and house, you’ll generally owe meaningfully less in Missouri—especially on the property-tax and estate-tax fronts. Illinois’ total burden is ~2.4 percentage points higher than Missouri’s; that gap is large enough to matter in real dollars on a middle- or high-income household.
WalletHub
re: Arrogant, old school SEC types
Posted by CelticTiger on 10/9/25 at 11:35 am to Open Dore Policy
quote:
Actually, I just want Bama to kick your butt because it helps our resume.
A little short-sighted don’t you think? Mizzou beats Bama and manages a win against Auburn, a 7-0 top 10 (hell maybe top 5 depending on what others do) team will roll into your house in a few weeks. Think of what beating THAT team would do for your resume.
Popular
2












