Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/2/11 at 5:34 pm to diddydirtyAubie
quote:
I don't think having 2 SEC titles in 10 years counts as a dynasty, brah.
exactly it shouldn't.
Posted on 3/2/11 at 5:34 pm to JoshuaChamberlain
quote:
JoshuaChamberlain
Eat it. Alabama > Auburn in about every conceivable way! You know it's true.
Posted on 3/2/11 at 5:35 pm to JBeam
Sean Connery drinking Jim Beam is a sin
This post was edited on 3/2/11 at 5:35 pm
Posted on 3/2/11 at 5:35 pm to JoshuaChamberlain
Arkansas Razorback track and field 40 national championships from 1984 to 2006 says the rest of you "dynasties" are posers
Posted on 3/2/11 at 5:35 pm to JBeam
Once again, the schedules were unbalanced and the Southern conference was 20 teams or more deep.
A one loss conference title season is not more impressive than a no loss, one tie, non conference title season.
A one loss conference title season is not more impressive than a no loss, one tie, non conference title season.
Posted on 3/2/11 at 5:36 pm to Crompdaddy8
OP trying to make Tennessee sound relevant again by posting records that happened when when my great great grandfather was living.
Posted on 3/2/11 at 5:40 pm to diddydirtyAubie
quote:
OP trying to make Tennessee sound relevant again by posting records that happened when when my great great grandfather was living.
So Bama's dynasty is irrelevant as well for a good majority of this board? lol.
Posted on 3/2/11 at 5:42 pm to m2pro
quote:
Eat it. Alabama > Auburn in about every conceivable way! You know it's true.
The British had one hell of a navy pre-1815..no one could touch them except on rare occasion. In fact I would say that they had arguably the greatest run of any country's navy...maybe ever. However, that is history...and I respect it as such. But to say the British Navy is the greatest in the world now....well that's just ignorant my friend.
Yao Ming?
Posted on 3/2/11 at 5:43 pm to Crompdaddy8
quote:
1) Tennessee 1925-1934
SEC wasn't formed until 1933. No SEC dynasty.
Posted on 3/2/11 at 5:44 pm to volfan30
quote:
volfan30
cant wait to see uggla this year. sorry to jump OT, just noticed the avi
Posted on 3/2/11 at 5:45 pm to JoshuaChamberlain
quote:
The British had one hell of a navy pre-1815..no one could touch them except on rare occasion. In fact I would say that they had arguably the greatest run of any country's navy...maybe ever. However, that is history...and I respect it as such. But to say the British Navy is the greatest in the world now....well that's just ignorant my friend.
love the history reference. differ with the basis of it though
Posted on 3/2/11 at 5:45 pm to auzach91
quote:
cant wait to see uggla this year
Posted on 3/2/11 at 5:46 pm to 87BAMAGRAD
quote:
87BAMAGRAD
Sweet Sig
Posted on 3/2/11 at 5:48 pm to volfan30
I'm a Kyle Busch man, but you've got to give the kid his due.
Posted on 3/2/11 at 5:48 pm to Volmanac
quote:
If you count them as half loss, you have to count them as half win as well. Just saying.
Alright, so UT was 84-12 (.700).
Posted on 3/2/11 at 5:48 pm to Crompdaddy8
Regarding #1. The SEC was founded in Dec. 1932. That's a nice stretch, but how is it considered the greatest dynasty in the SEC?
Posted on 3/2/11 at 5:48 pm to auzach91
quote:
cant wait to see uggla this year. sorry to jump OT, just noticed the avi
Me neither. Our offense should be much improved.
Posted on 3/2/11 at 5:50 pm to Teague
quote:
84-12 (.700).
again
kinda gump math are you doing? 84/96 does not equal .700.
Posted on 3/2/11 at 5:52 pm to Volmanac
quote:
Once again, the schedules were unbalanced and the Southern conference was 20 teams or more deep.
The fact that the SEC wasn't even created until 1933 completely invalidates Tennessee's claim to #1. Also, it's not like you played every single team in the Southern Conference. Plus, Alabama had 4 Southern Conference titles from 1924-1930 while Tennessee had 2 in that 10 year period.
Page 2 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News