Started By
Message
re: 11 greatest dynasties in the SEC
Posted on 3/2/11 at 5:52 pm to volfan30
Posted on 3/2/11 at 5:52 pm to volfan30
If winning games at the highest level that anyone has ever won them on doesnt get you a championship, it shows you how much a championship is worth. Alabama won more western division titles than tennessee won eastern in the late 90s. Who was the superior program?
2
Posted on 3/2/11 at 5:52 pm to 87BAMAGRAD
quote:
I'm a Kyle Busch man, but you've got to give the kid his due.
I'm not really a Nascar fan. But yeah, pretty sweet to have a hometown kid win the biggest race there is.
Posted on 3/2/11 at 5:53 pm to Crompdaddy8
Since you are only talking football I will let you slide, BUT keep in mind, should, and that is a big should, LSU win a MNC in the next 3 years, they will have 3 in 10 as would Fla. should they win one. just sayin... I take the MNC over SEC titles ANY DAY! So would you.
Other sports like UK basketball, Arky basketball, and T&F,
LSU T&F 11 straight NC (outdoors) for our women, etc. Trump all of those football stats.
Wooo piggies is even better than us. Go research the late 80's through 2000 and check out LSU adn Arky in T&F.
Other sports like UK basketball, Arky basketball, and T&F,
LSU T&F 11 straight NC (outdoors) for our women, etc. Trump all of those football stats.
Wooo piggies is even better than us. Go research the late 80's through 2000 and check out LSU adn Arky in T&F.
This post was edited on 3/2/11 at 6:29 pm
Posted on 3/2/11 at 5:54 pm to CarrytheFight
The thing is that we all know that Alabama is by far the greatest program in SEC history. But the gap between tennessee and GEORGIA(who is 3rd) is also large.
Posted on 3/2/11 at 5:54 pm to volfan30
quote:
again kinda gump math are you doing?
84/96 does not equal .700.
Oh wait, you're right. I do suck at math (art major here :D )
.875
Posted on 3/2/11 at 5:55 pm to Teague
quote:
Oh wait, you're right. I do suck at math (art major here :D )
.875
Better
Posted on 3/2/11 at 5:56 pm to volfan30
quote:
Better
I knew that seemed like a big jump. :D
Posted on 3/2/11 at 5:59 pm to Damn Good Dawg
Tennessee 1989-1998
101-20-1(.829)
4 SEC championships 1 national title. Just sayin. This list could be better.
101-20-1(.829)
4 SEC championships 1 national title. Just sayin. This list could be better.
Posted on 3/2/11 at 6:00 pm to CarrytheFight
quote:
Alabama won more western division titles than tennessee won eastern in the late 90s. Who was the superior program?
Winning the West wasn't hard to do in the 1990s. Alabama was really the only legitimate team in that division at the time. But Alabama was winning more conference titles in the 20s and 30s than Tennessee was during that same time period - which is what matters when calling yourself a dynasty.
Posted on 3/2/11 at 6:17 pm to RollTide1987
During the period in question(25-34) Tennessee won 88 percent of its games while bama won 84. Tennessee was 4-3 vs Alabama during the time period. Your championships arent worth the paper they are written on.
MOST DAMNING EVIDENCE AGAINST THE BAMA CHAMPIONSHIPS.
MOST DAMNING EVIDENCE AGAINST THE BAMA CHAMPIONSHIPS.
This post was edited on 3/2/11 at 6:19 pm
Posted on 3/2/11 at 6:20 pm to volfan30
quote:
I'm not really a Nascar fan.
Nobody is but me. What do the rest of you people watch between football seasons? MLB and NBA don't cut it for me. I can watch NCAA Men Bama, but other than that, there's a sports vacuum.
Chicken, let me run the new NASCAR board.
Posted on 3/2/11 at 6:21 pm to Whereisomaha
quote:
quote:
Note: While neither the Coaches nor AP awarded these teams any titles, various other services did award titles in 1959, 1960, & 1962
Such bullshite. The 1959 team went down as the greatest team of the 20th century, yet people arent recognizing them as NC.
yada yada,
see also State Penn, twice undefeated in the 60's and 70's and just the runner up in the pre-BCS era.
see also Aubie 13-0 and not invited to the big one.
it happens.
Posted on 3/2/11 at 6:54 pm to ottothewise
Plus, that ole miss team was NOT the best team of the century. That would be 95 Nebraska
Posted on 3/2/11 at 6:57 pm to Crompdaddy8
Here is a dynasty. Everythning else you listed on football is not a dynasty.
Mens T&F Outdoor
1989 LSU
1990 LSU
1991 Tennessee
1992 Arkansas
1993 Arkansas
1994 Arkansas
1995 Arkansas
1996 Arkansas
1997 Arkansas
1998 Arkansas
1999 Arkansas
2000 Stanford
2001 Tennessee
2002 LSU
2003 Arkansas
2004 vacated^
2005 vacated^
Indoor Men
n
2006 Arkansas
2005 Arkansas
2004 LSU
2003 Arkansas
2002 Tennessee
2001 LSU
2000 Arkansas
1999 Arkansas
1998 Arkansas
1997 Arkansas
1996 George Mason
1995 Arkansas
1994 Arkansas
1993 Arkansas
1992 Arkansas
1991 Arkansas
1990 Arkansas
1989 Arkansas
1988 Arkansas
1987 Arkansas
1986 Arkansas
1985 Arkansas
Women Indoor
2005 Tennessee
2004 LSU
2003 LSU
2002 LSU
2001 UCLA
2000 UCLA
1999 Texas
1998 Texas
1997 LSU
1996 LSU
1995 LSU
1994 LSU
1993 LSU
1992 Florida
1991 LSU
1990 Texas
1989 LSU
1988 Texas
1987 LSU
Women Outdoor
2003 LSU
2002 South Carolina
2001 Southern California
2000 LSU
1999 Texas
1998 Texas
1997 LSU
1996 LSU
1995 LSU
1994 LSU
1993 LSU
1992 LSU
1991 LSU
1990 LSU
1989 LSU
1988 LSU
1987 LSU
Mens T&F Outdoor
1989 LSU
1990 LSU
1991 Tennessee
1992 Arkansas
1993 Arkansas
1994 Arkansas
1995 Arkansas
1996 Arkansas
1997 Arkansas
1998 Arkansas
1999 Arkansas
2000 Stanford
2001 Tennessee
2002 LSU
2003 Arkansas
2004 vacated^
2005 vacated^
Indoor Men
n
2006 Arkansas
2005 Arkansas
2004 LSU
2003 Arkansas
2002 Tennessee
2001 LSU
2000 Arkansas
1999 Arkansas
1998 Arkansas
1997 Arkansas
1996 George Mason
1995 Arkansas
1994 Arkansas
1993 Arkansas
1992 Arkansas
1991 Arkansas
1990 Arkansas
1989 Arkansas
1988 Arkansas
1987 Arkansas
1986 Arkansas
1985 Arkansas
Women Indoor
2005 Tennessee
2004 LSU
2003 LSU
2002 LSU
2001 UCLA
2000 UCLA
1999 Texas
1998 Texas
1997 LSU
1996 LSU
1995 LSU
1994 LSU
1993 LSU
1992 Florida
1991 LSU
1990 Texas
1989 LSU
1988 Texas
1987 LSU
Women Outdoor
2003 LSU
2002 South Carolina
2001 Southern California
2000 LSU
1999 Texas
1998 Texas
1997 LSU
1996 LSU
1995 LSU
1994 LSU
1993 LSU
1992 LSU
1991 LSU
1990 LSU
1989 LSU
1988 LSU
1987 LSU
Posted on 3/2/11 at 7:09 pm to Crompdaddy8
I liked seeing Tennessee on top of the list, but no way in hell I can put them over Alabama from 71-80. From 71-79 they had 11 total losses.
Hell, Bama has 4 claimed titles from 1925-1934, and we don't have any.
Hell, Bama has 4 claimed titles from 1925-1934, and we don't have any.
Posted on 3/2/11 at 7:10 pm to ohiovol
quote:
During the period in question(25-34) Tennessee won 88 percent of its games while bama won 84. Tennessee was 4-3 vs Alabama during the time period. Your championships arent worth the paper they are written on.
Posted on 3/2/11 at 7:10 pm to Whereisomaha
quote:
Such bullshite. The 1959 team went down as the greatest team of the 20th century, yet people arent recognizing them as NC.
In what way could an all white team with a loss be the greatest team of the century?
This post was edited on 3/2/11 at 7:11 pm
Posted on 3/2/11 at 7:12 pm to CarrytheFight
quote:
Tennessee 1989-1998
101-20-1(.829)
4 SEC championships 1 national title. Just sayin. This list could be better.
Not even the dominant team in the conference over that time span.
Posted on 3/2/11 at 7:13 pm to ohiovol
quote:
Not even the dominant team in the conference over that time span.
Neither was the Alabama team you just fawned over.
Posted on 3/2/11 at 7:18 pm to auzach91
for aubie, perhaps. 
Page 3 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News