Favorite team:Alabama 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:29732
Registered on:11/12/2008
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

Does Noah's Flood come to mind?


There are over 175 individual flooding "myths" or records across human written records and histories.
quote:

Move 500 miles Inland and above 2500 ft


5000 feet+
quote:

You're right wing like MTG is right wing.



I am nothing like her, but what is right wing anymore anyway?

I am mostly an anti marxist, anti commies, anti progressive, fiscal conservative who wants to strengthen the family unit and fight to fire all politicians. Time to remove the foreign agents we all continually elect. :usa:
quote:

There’s no reason to take anything like that seriously. Nobody had any way of knowing what kind of geologic shifts we could see over the next millennia. Same as the climate change hoaxers


ECDO os a study of what has happened in our planet's history. By the author himself, his theory is not a predictive one by its nature. In his theory, he has made every effort to prove and disprove it with objective analysis. He specifically states he loathes "loosh." He thinks every time we give into fear we are assisting the very powers that have obscured our history from us.

At any rate, ECDO theory is "a geophysical and climatological hypothesis with interdisciplinary extensions into geology, archaeology, and cultural history, positing a natural cyclic dynamic system that challenges mainstream explanations for climate change and Earth's rotational history by emphasizing internal core-driven processes over anthropogenic factors."
quote:

Do you feel your scare porn crumbling around you yet.



So many of you offer insult, when all I am doing is talking about something that is wildly fascinating to me, and harrowing.

Is it wrong to discuss something even though the implications are scary? I will suffer the same end if any of this comes to pass in our lifetimes. It is fair to say it scares me. Am I not allowed to talk it out with people online just because some are offended by it?

I don't offer fear porn for the sake of worrying people. I talk about all this because I am legitimately concerned. I think this topic is worthy of breaking down and taking a deep look at it.

If that bothers you, and the only thing you come to offer is insult. Well, good luck with that.
If you have any relevant discussion, I'm all ears.

I have seen many confident earth scientists professionally critique TES (the ethical skeptic) and they always end up believers... except for pseudo intellectuals who have been to college for 4 years with a degree that, to their own peril, clutch mainstream dogma and refuse to debate the actual material.

I am not here to pretend to be anything but an average Joe on this subject. I am here, however, to do some back and forth and learn outside perspectives than the spheres im usually in.

Despite however it may look, I am actually very dedicated to learn something new so that I can NOT buy into ECDO theory. I would very much like to not buy into this. But I feel I have seen every argument against them before a time or two, and they are always wanting.

If you have something I can go back into my X circles and share, that would be swell.
quote:

You're the worst kind of phony. Start a topic with a bunch of SME jargon and then refuse to synthesize it for people because you likely can't but don't want to admit it. So we just get the condescending "figure it out" bullshite.


Did you miss the part where I was saying it took my arse years to distill the stuff I did type up? I was specifically NOT lumping my arse in with these smart dudes. I just don't know how to break it down any further than I did. I felt what I typed was as good as I could have typed it up. Sorry if you are offended by it? But yeah. I'm not trying to pretend I am beyond of you folks.

I dropped this thread because this topic has been a consuming topic for me for a long time. I felt it would be a good exchange, and break from the normal material here.
quote:

Then why do you and your party support and defend illegal immigrants?


Did you just assume I'm a liberal because of my thoughts on our earth's core/mantle? :lol:

Not only am I staunchly "right wing," but so are each of the people that I am citing. (Caveat, i do not know the guy I cited named Zacharia in the embedded X post, but Ethical Skeptic and Ben Davidson are. Ben is a groyper. TES likes his guns, but he doesnt discuss politics often unless for how it relates to all of his work on COVID and vaccines.
quote:

Archaeology huh. What’s that got to do with polar shift


You have a lot to learn.
quote:

You have this Geoscientist confused. I know there is a magnetic drift, but the magnetic pole shift isn't a physical thing in the framework of how the earth rotates. Magnetic poles do affect our defense against Coronal mass ejections, but that is the extent of it. There will be no earth shattering events that cause the Earth to suddenly stop and produce walls of water that inundate cities.



If only that were so.

This link disagrees with you

this one also

and one last one

quote:

Yet you provide a simple theory that has little historical evidence.


What i have provided has a preponderance of evidence. Geological, archaeol, and historic evidence. As I have linked above to look into ethical skeptic's work, which i linked.

This was one of many articles he has dived into on a scholarly level. But his experience isn't from books alone. It is from a half of a lifetime abroad, on site, studying.

*edit*

Going to visit my mom for NYE for a while. I wont be by to answer questions for a while. Y'all enjoy gnawing on all this. It may sound absurd to say, but I love this board and the general things we all want to see in this world.
quote:

You are predicting destruction on the level of the "Day after Tomorrow" within years


Do you understand how many years I have personally suggested?
quote:

When are you moving?



The second I convince all of my family (so never).... otherwise, I tie my fate to them. The reality is grim even in the event a person survives phase 1 of all this. So, I'll continue to keep my own thoughts to myself and not spend the rest of my life trying to convince people of things they WILL to not believe in. This is a hard pill to swallow for anyone. Even the objective and scientific mind.

Also, the primary theory I buy stock into, does not prove that we will necessarily see the core/mantle decouple in our lifetimes.

So.... I stay engaged in the topic. Spread what I can where I find honest ears, and hope that our species will, in time, learn to take this seriously. Hopefully IN time.
quote:

I dunno. It is gonna really frick up crawfish prices, though.



:lol:

Always.
quote:

This is a theory, not science fact.



How does theory become fact?

Evidence based research.

Who gets funded for research? Whoever the government says.

What happens when someone doesn't get funded by the tax payer? It creates a much steeper barrier to entry for the devoted. And yet, still, the devoted are winning this current narrative. X and other platforms that don't, yet, explicitly censor scientific research, are allowing a vast network of researchers to create models. Those are models we are now seeing.

If it is your desire to only listen to what the government and MSM tells you is science, that is your prerogative.

Similarly, it is mine to help others to look into things that I find important.

When you say "wake you up when something happens" you are also utterly ignoring my OP. Our pole is now wandering from canada to siberia, and even mainstream science has acknowledged this. The rate at which it is moving is -very- alarming.

re: Iran might be falling

Posted by m2pro on 12/31/25 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

The people of Iran have more balls than Americans, that’s embarrassing!



They have a lot less to lose, but still. You're not totally wrong.

Now, hopefully we will see current Israel regime fall.
quote:

It got rough at times in the past but we all pulled through it.


We -all- didn't pull through it, at all. The planet survives until the sun devours it, that much is true.
quote:

If this is as bad as you say it will be, what will being informed do?



Suppose one of Ethical Skeptic's hopeful timelines is the most accurate, and we have a few hundred years to solve for X.

What would a unified world populace, at least on ONE thing, do for mankind?

That is the reason I bring it to my friends here. I think awareness is step 1.
quote:

Correct me if I’m wrong, The further the poles move from center of axis, the closer to civilization charged electrons from CME get pulled into the earth, thus increasing the chance of catastrophic damage to our electric grid if we get a carrington level solar storm.



I wish I could answer that for you.

I am only now beginning to learn the CME stuff on a mildly deep level. What we do know is that our magnetosphere is weakening, and as that happens, more solar radiation will come through with major CME's. This certainly affects us in the way of the Carrington event. But that event is the least of our potential troubles with regards to the main topic here.
quote:

So, basically, we're looking a range of occurrence of between the year 2325-3325.



Incorrect.

Some models are imminent. Some suggest 10-20 years. Some suggest imminent to 300-400 years.
quote:

How much more in taxes do I need to send to prevent this?



Already been answered. None of these scientists proposing these theories are subsidized.

0$