Started By
Message
georgia underachievers or overrated?
Posted on 6/18/14 at 7:50 pm
Posted on 6/18/14 at 7:50 pm
18
Posted on 6/18/14 at 7:52 pm to SECdragonmaster
Oh look a Georgia thread started by an Auburn fan
Posted on 6/18/14 at 7:52 pm to SECdragonmaster
Underachievers, but that's nothing new...
Posted on 6/18/14 at 7:52 pm to SECdragonmaster
Haven't we been there done that with this thread?
Posted on 6/18/14 at 7:58 pm to SECdragonmaster
quote:
SECdragonmaster
Sorry for the rejection bro.
Posted on 6/18/14 at 8:01 pm to Bud Davis
glad to see you mutts took 13 seconds to read the article.
it was posted today and the statistics shocked me.
thought others wouldmfind it interesting.
and no I am not hurt.
just enjoying my teams SEC title reign.
it was posted today and the statistics shocked me.
thought others wouldmfind it interesting.
and no I am not hurt.
just enjoying my teams SEC title reign.
Posted on 6/18/14 at 8:03 pm to SECdragonmaster
Crazy how Georgia is 4-2 vs. Auburn during that stretch
Posted on 6/18/14 at 8:08 pm to Crowknowsbest
quote:
Crazy how Georgia is 4-2 vs. Auburn during that stretch
when the REAL number hurt (SEC titles and winning percentage over GOOD teams)....... you have to resort to cherry picking records over rivals.
hope that 4-2 helps you sleep at night.
nothing beats the smile on my face when I drive over to atlanta and see all those Auburn flags flying during the SECC game.
Posted on 6/18/14 at 8:09 pm to SECdragonmaster
quote:
To be sure, nearly 20 Georgia natives were selected in the 2014 NFL draft, and only one of them signed with the Dawgs. That player? Zach Mettenberger – who finished his career as an LSU Tiger.
Posted on 6/18/14 at 8:09 pm to SECdragonmaster
Leghumpers maybe sorta illiterate.
Strong article.
Strong article.
Posted on 6/18/14 at 8:11 pm to SECdragonmaster
quote:
hope that 4-2 helps you sleep at night.
Georgia's record doesn't effect how well I sleep, good or bad
Posted on 6/18/14 at 8:14 pm to SECdragonmaster
This is a simple case of Russ here not being able to see the forest for the trees. He is far too wrapped up in the numbers to see anything else.
Odd time period to select as well. He doesn't go back to a coordinator change or a major influx or exodus of a group of players and 6 years isn't exactly a common demarcation. Wonder what was behind that?
Anyway, the reasons for those numbers are simple and can be summed up in 6 words: Willie Martinez followed by Todd Grantham.
Odd time period to select as well. He doesn't go back to a coordinator change or a major influx or exodus of a group of players and 6 years isn't exactly a common demarcation. Wonder what was behind that?
Anyway, the reasons for those numbers are simple and can be summed up in 6 words: Willie Martinez followed by Todd Grantham.
Posted on 6/18/14 at 8:15 pm to SECdragonmaster
Oh look a shitty Auburn thread
Posted on 6/18/14 at 8:20 pm to Nicolae
quote:
Odd time period to select as well.
Really? seven seasons is a pretty decent sample size. Of course we could cherry pick UGA-style and look at 2002-2005. A time when Florida was down, South Carolina was mediocre, and Tennessee was slipping.
This post was edited on 6/18/14 at 8:24 pm
Posted on 6/18/14 at 8:27 pm to Crowknowsbest
quote:
Crazy how Georgia is 4-2 vs. Auburn during that stretch
I think what the author is getting at is that you only beat teams you should beat. You are certainly 4-2 against us during that period but you should have been. Two of those years we were horrible. The other two of your wins were against mediocre Auburn teams when UGA was very good.
He is saying that you are only winning when you should. You never excel.
This post was edited on 6/18/14 at 8:28 pm
Posted on 6/18/14 at 8:35 pm to LanierSpots
Let's not pretend like the UGA teams in the given time frame were particularly good.
There was one really good team in that timeframe in 2012. That team played a bad schedule and didn't play many good conference teams. 2008 and 2011 were decent teams, but not great. 2013 was doing well until they got crushed by injuries. Same with 2008 really.
The 2009 and 2010 teams were bad.
That stat really isn't surprising.
There was one really good team in that timeframe in 2012. That team played a bad schedule and didn't play many good conference teams. 2008 and 2011 were decent teams, but not great. 2013 was doing well until they got crushed by injuries. Same with 2008 really.
The 2009 and 2010 teams were bad.
That stat really isn't surprising.
Posted on 6/18/14 at 8:35 pm to SECdragonmaster
quote:
glad to see you mutts took 13 seconds to read the article.
quote:
just enjoying my teams SEC title reign.
This post was edited on 6/18/14 at 8:38 pm
Posted on 6/18/14 at 8:36 pm to SECdragonmaster
perrenial underachievers
Posted on 6/18/14 at 8:37 pm to Crowknowsbest
quote:
The 2009 and 2010 teams were bad.
I was in Athens in 2009 and UGA was lucky to win that game. If it were not for Rambo knocking his arse out hitting mario Fannin, Auburn wins.
Dude took one for the team..
Posted on 6/18/14 at 8:38 pm to SECdragonmaster
It's a culture problem that starts at the top.
Page 1 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News