Started By
Message
re: Guess: How many for and against? 6-8
Posted on 7/21/21 at 10:35 pm to BigBro
Posted on 7/21/21 at 10:35 pm to BigBro
quote:
Texans IN PERSON are pretty good folks, aggies included.. but that doesn’t always come across on message boards.. so we come off as confident smug assh0les who think that our sh1t doesn’t stink..
Your fans are arrogant in person (when it comes to sports), your tailgates are boring, catered sipping parties and your schools’ shenanigans in the Big 12 don’t endear you to anyone.
Love living here, though.
1
Posted on 7/21/21 at 10:38 pm to dawgfan24348
quote:
Money talks yall
Just so cringeworthy. Come up with another genuine and unique response ffs.
Posted on 7/21/21 at 10:44 pm to FearlessFreep
I think Arkansas votes yes this time. I think it is more nostalgia with Texas.
Posted on 7/21/21 at 10:49 pm to Zhorn96
quote:
being reported that OU and Texas are notifying the Big12 they wont renew media rights. ESPN also owns LHN so can easily absorb and rebrand it into the SEC network
feels like it is happening
ahh yes. feels like 2010 all over again. where is Larry Scott these days
Posted on 7/21/21 at 10:49 pm to dchog
I agree. Most schools want the addition exposure playing in Austin.
Posted on 7/21/21 at 10:51 pm to Ted2010
Not only did Texas punk A@M in the bug 12 but they did it on sec media days to lol wow …..
Posted on 7/21/21 at 10:51 pm to LSUGrrrl
what about Texas and Florida State?
Posted on 7/21/21 at 10:51 pm to CharlotteSooner
quote:
Okie has gone out of their way to throw insults at the SEC recently from both coach and admin.
This has never happened. Stop being such a snowflake puss.
Lookie here sodbuster… do you think we have forgotten Bob Stoops’ insult war against the SEC, echoed by your University President, and repeated for years? You may have forgotten those offensive statements, as well as your fans chanting SEC as an insult.
You may think your admins publicly roiling proud SEC Universities a few years ago was just rah-rah “all in good fun.” Well… It wasn’t appreciated then and it is remembered now.
Now maybe if Oklahorns realized they are the supplicants and quit acting like you are doing anyone a favor… and quit big talking about adding millions to every SEC school… that is BS too… we already have those markets covered.
Maybe you could google up bob stoops and his war of words against the SEC. In the meantime, frick you and your dust bowl, jalopy driving, sodbusting fans.
And another thing… the Oklahorn fans think it was cool and a real gotcha to troll A$M on their media day… Lookie here dumazz, Ags may be weird and different, but now they are OUR SEC weird-different… so maybe you poor doggies should learn to show a little respect until you earn some credibility.
This post was edited on 7/21/21 at 11:00 pm
Posted on 7/21/21 at 10:52 pm to JCdawg
quote:
Most schools want the addition exposure playing in Austin.
Kind of like all the exposure we’ve had in Georgia, playing one game there in a decade?
Posted on 7/21/21 at 10:54 pm to CavalryAg07
quote:
what about Texas and Florida State?
What about them?
Posted on 7/21/21 at 10:56 pm to LSUGrrrl
doesn't have to be Texas and OU. will be interesting to see.
Posted on 7/21/21 at 10:58 pm to BigBro
“I get that Aggy vote. But I really don’t understand the Missouri one.. They would 100% have left for the Big 10 if ever offered, maybe even still today“
Because the university of Texas is a bad business partner. The lack of self awareness among horn fans is pretty incredible. Mizzou was as much running from the horns attempt to bully the conference as they were running to the SEC. Texas created the house of cards they live in, and will attempt to operate the same way in the SEC.
I get folks from traditional SEC schools dismissing our perspective on Texas, but I think it’s telling that most Mizzou fans are as insistent that Texas doesn’t join as we are. I’d prefer we add two other teams, but if we have to add one of the two, for the love of the SEC, take OU and not Texas.
Because the university of Texas is a bad business partner. The lack of self awareness among horn fans is pretty incredible. Mizzou was as much running from the horns attempt to bully the conference as they were running to the SEC. Texas created the house of cards they live in, and will attempt to operate the same way in the SEC.
I get folks from traditional SEC schools dismissing our perspective on Texas, but I think it’s telling that most Mizzou fans are as insistent that Texas doesn’t join as we are. I’d prefer we add two other teams, but if we have to add one of the two, for the love of the SEC, take OU and not Texas.
Posted on 7/21/21 at 11:00 pm to Jacknola
quote:
Bob Stoops’ insult war against the SEC, echoed by your University President, and repeated for years?
Bob didn't insult the SEC nor was there ever any "insult war". You're being a drama queen.
quote:
And another thing… the Oklahorn fans think it was cool and a real gotcha to troll A$M on their media day… Lookie here dumazz, Ags may be weird and different, but now they are OUR SEC weird-different… so maybe you poor doggies should learn to show a little respect until you earn some credibility.
Aggots are who leaked it in the first place during their media day, and you have terrible taste in company. You've learned NOTHING about aggot since they joined your league, but your big bro aggot protectionism instinct is adorable.
This post was edited on 7/21/21 at 11:05 pm
Posted on 7/21/21 at 11:02 pm to CavalryAg07
quote:
doesn't have to be Texas and OU. will be interesting to see.
Texas is a hard pass no matter what. I’d take almost any of the teams in the East that would make sense regionally. OK doesn’t make sense without Texas but I’d take them with only a little grumbling if Texas wasn’t part of the package.
I’m not scared of Texas. I hate their arrogant fan base, the strong arming tactics they used to control the *big 12, their game day atmosphere and self entitlement.
This post was edited on 7/21/21 at 11:07 pm
Posted on 7/21/21 at 11:02 pm to Zhorn96
quote:
$10-15M more per year and you still dont like us?
You are full of shite. More like $5MM/year less. Doesn't matter. You not getting in. Too many alliances to prevent adding 2nd in state teams have been formed.
Posted on 7/21/21 at 11:04 pm to Tiger_Claw
The only solid no vote is Aggie
Posted on 7/21/21 at 11:05 pm to FishFearMe
quote:
You are full of shite. More like $5MM/year less. Doesn't matter. You not getting in. Too many alliances to prevent adding 2nd in state teams have been formed.
You are completely delusional if you think that this deal won’t make every team more money.. about $10 million more by my calculations.. I can show my work if you like.
Posted on 7/21/21 at 11:08 pm to FishFearMe
quote:
You are full of shite. More like $5MM/year less. Doesn't matter. You not getting in. Too many alliances to prevent adding 2nd in state teams have been formed.
The consensus is that we’re moving towards four 16 team conferences. I think the schools you’re referring to (especially UF, USC, UGA) might bet that they can screw us on this one, increase the conference revenue per school, and lock out their in state rivals permanently.
This post was edited on 7/21/21 at 11:10 pm
Posted on 7/21/21 at 11:13 pm to 14&Counting
quote:Mizzou knows what it’s like to be parters with the assclowns in Austin. They’re a solid no. I wouldn’t be surprised if they bolt to the Big 10 if Texas joins the SEC, and the Big 10 would have them.
The only solid no vote is Aggie
Posted on 7/21/21 at 11:14 pm to BigBro
I dgaf what you spend your miserable life calculating. Net neutrality kills it.
It has been very refreshing to be around SEC fans and away from you arrogant a holes.
It has been very refreshing to be around SEC fans and away from you arrogant a holes.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News