Started By
Message

Mizzou’s Damon Wilson takes Georgia to court

Posted on 12/23/25 at 11:42 am
Posted by MizzouTrue
Member since Jun 2016
4929 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 11:42 am
We’ll see who wins

On3: Missouri’s Damon Wilson sues over NIL dispute
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 11:43 am
Posted by Jrv2damac
KS (mountain time)
Member since Mar 2004
72338 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 11:45 am to
Hope it goes better than the court appearance by MIZ yesterday.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
21405 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 11:51 am to
how are you 20 points worse the friggin illinois?
Posted by Aguga
Member since Aug 2021
3735 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 11:53 am to
We should all be pulling for UGA.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
26044 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 11:54 am to
It sounds like a desperation move by Wilson's camp.

I doubt it works. But we will see.
Posted by Rex Feral
Member since Jan 2014
16025 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 11:54 am to
quote:

Damon Wilson

So he took $390,000 nil money from UGA and then enters the portal the next week? All things aside, that speaks a lot of who he is.
Posted by theballguy
Member since Oct 2011
31378 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 11:58 am to
Posted by GulfSouthTiger
Member since Jun 2025
426 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 11:58 am to
I hope he loses. This shite is ridiculous.
Posted by junkyarddawg3
Metro ATL
Member since Nov 2015
883 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 11:59 am to
I won’t pretend to know. Just hope it works out for all.
Posted by SpartanSoul
Member since Aug 2016
2668 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

“When the University of Georgia Athletic Association enters binding agreements with student-athletes, we honor our commitments and expect student-athletes to do the same,” Georgia athletics spokesman Steven Drummond told ESPN in a statement Dec. 5.

Wilson’s defamation claim alleges Drummond’s quote above “was misleading given that no binding agreement existed with Wilson,” per an email sent to On3.


I can't imagine that kind of money changing hands without a clear contract so this "should" be a quick read of the paperwork, but I have little faith in our legal system.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
21405 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

So he took $390,000 nil money from UGA and then enters the portal the next week? All things aside, that speaks a lot of who he is.


No. UGA paid Wilson $30k. Missouri ended up reimbursing UGA that $30k.
Posted by DawgsLife
Ellijay, Ga.
Member since Jun 2013
61725 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:14 pm to
It should be interesting, for sure.

“Damon never had a contract with them. I don’t see how Georgia thinks intimidation and litigation will help their recruitment efforts — maybe players could bring lawyers with them to practice.”

This should be easily proven true or false easily.

The countersuit alleges Wilson signed what he considered to be a non-binding “term sheet” and not a binding NIL contract without the presence of legal council and felt pressured to sign the paperwork “with the understanding it was not final” on Dec. 21, 2024.

If this is true, it will be his first lesson in life. You are sigingin papers potentially involving hundreds of thousands of dollars and not have a lawyer look it over?

Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
75893 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:18 pm to
I’m siding with the university over the player every single time in these situations.
Posted by Floyd Dawg
Silver Creek, GA
Member since Jul 2018
4923 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:18 pm to
No they didn’t.

They gave it to Wilson and his family to reimburse UGA; by all accounts, they failed to do so.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
21405 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:22 pm to
quote:


No they didn’t.

They gave it to Wilson and his family to reimburse UGA; by all accounts, they failed to do so.


Interesting if true. One of the Mizzou beat writers had an article where he was saying Missouri paid back the money to UGA.
Posted by Jrv2damac
KS (mountain time)
Member since Mar 2004
72338 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

how are you 20 points worse the friggin illinois?


Tsk. You know better.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
21405 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

Tsk. You know better.


Sorry, you are 24 points worse than illini. it is mind boggling.
Posted by jbdawgs03
Athens
Member since Oct 2017
12578 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:59 pm to
Missouri gave it to Wilson which he never paid
Posted by Russianblue
Member since Nov 2007
1647 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:10 pm to
One interesting piece of this which I’d like to know if all schools are doing other than just Georgia is the form of contract here. It’s got a heavily punitive aspect to it.

I can see the logic of “you come here and as long as you are here, we pay you $30k a month. If you leave, the payments stop”.

UGAs position (which I think is awesome) conforms more to a typical 2 party agreement where both sides have to meet their full obligation and imposes damages if not. I don’t know why any kid would sign that these days tbh.

So apparently this was a one-ish year contract or 13 months. he stays for a month then bolts. kid signed a bad deal.

but that begs the question how many of these contracts are written like this and how big a negotiating point it becomes. also SHOCKED that Mizzou didn’t make the kid produce this paperwork up front and nip this in the bud on his behalf. “kid, you know if you come to Mizzou, this deal you signed w UGA says you owe them $300k plus?”
Posted by CelticTiger
Saint Louis
Member since Feb 2019
1533 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

Missouri gave it to Wilson which he never paid


That may or may not be true, I have no way of knowing, but people are getting confused here. We're talking about $30k not, $390k.

The $30k should definitely have been repaid. The liquidated damages part is bullshite. He never got that money. I've spent a career dealing with executive compensation. The general rule is if the exec breaks the contract, he pays back the funds that have been advanced but not yet earned and forfeits any other stock or options granted but not vested.

In terms of personal services contracts, you can not MAKE someone work for you or make them pay you if they choose not to. Generally, you can only recover what has been paid but not earned.

ETA: This is different from say an entertainer who is a no-show for a concert, the promoter of which has sold tickets and booked a venue and has real out-of-pocket damages. If Georgia is going this route, it would have to prove and quantify actual damages sustained. I think they would be hard-pressed to quantify how one player's departure cost them ticket sales, etc.
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 1:30 pm
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter