Started By
Message

If LSU and Bama aren’t permanent opponents, it is with 100% certainty…
Posted on 8/24/25 at 12:22 pm
Posted on 8/24/25 at 12:22 pm
that Alabama cried to the commissioner about being required to carry Tennessee, Auburn, and LSU.
Anyone outside of the SEC and anyone without malice and bias understands and concedes this game has been THE SEC Prime Time Football Game over the last 25 years and should remain as one of the annual premier matchups.
Bama cried like a bitch if these 2 teams aren’t permanent opponents.
Anyone outside of the SEC and anyone without malice and bias understands and concedes this game has been THE SEC Prime Time Football Game over the last 25 years and should remain as one of the annual premier matchups.
Bama cried like a bitch if these 2 teams aren’t permanent opponents.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 12:26 pm to PurpleSingularity
We're not your rival. There's no historical significance tied to these games. There's not even a nickname tied to the series.
Go piss your pants over another game.
Go piss your pants over another game.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 12:32 pm to Marktastic86
As an outsider, the OP is not wrong watching LSU vs Alabama has always been a prime time SEC matchup. If your Alabama what team is your third rival?
Posted on 8/24/25 at 12:32 pm to PurpleSingularity
Bama - 56 wins
LSU - 27 wins
Last 13 games
Bama-11 wins
LSU - 2 wins
I don't think bama fans are sad if LSU stays a permanent game.
LSU - 27 wins
Last 13 games
Bama-11 wins
LSU - 2 wins
I don't think bama fans are sad if LSU stays a permanent game.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 12:35 pm to PurpleSingularity
There should be NO permanent rivalry games. Only fair way is fully rotating.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 12:35 pm to PurpleSingularity
quote:
If LSU and Bama aren’t permanent opponents, it is with 100% certainty…that Alabama cried to the commissioner
Probably not as loud as PurpleSingularity.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 12:36 pm to Marktastic86
quote:
We're not your rival. There's no historical significance tied to these games.
I mean…. That’s not entirely true. LSU is Bama’s 3rd most played opponent behind only Miss State and Tennessee.
LSU has played Bama 16 more times than Florida who most consider to be a rival of LSU.
Considering the Bama-LSU game has been the #2 most watched matchup in the SEC from a viewership standpoint… and Top 3 in all of College Football for the past 15 years… makes this game significant. Using the term “rivalry” certainly seems fitting.
I do think ABC/ESPN will push for this game to be annual. If it’s not, I think what the OP is saying is probabably true… they got pushback from one or both sides about the SOS being too difficult compared to others.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 12:37 pm to Hilonghorn9
quote:
As an outsider, the OP is not wrong watching LSU vs Alabama has always been a prime time SEC matchup. If your Alabama what team is your third rival?
No it hasn't
Posted on 8/24/25 at 12:39 pm to secuniversity
quote:
No it hasn't
But Mississippi State has been? Is that what y'all are trying to go with?
Posted on 8/24/25 at 12:41 pm to Hilonghorn9
These are the same ding dongs who think 2000 was like 5 years ago
Posted on 8/24/25 at 12:44 pm to PurpleSingularity
It’s not a rivalry. Growing up I never thought of LSU as a rival. Saban happened and that was fun but in the year 2025, post Saban? LSU shouldn’t be considered a historical rival just because the last 18 years it mattered more.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 12:47 pm to PurpleSingularity
quote:
that Alabama cried to the commissioner about being required to carry Tennessee, Auburn, and LSU.
With the seasonal rotation of six teams, who your three permanent teams are really doesn’t make that much of a difference as far as overall strength of schedule. You are going to play a tough schedule no matter what.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 12:48 pm to AUTiger789
From a geographical standpoint, Miss State makes the most sense. Closest campuses in the conference. Alabama has played State more than Auburn, LSU and Tennessee.
If it’s not MSU because the series hasn’t been competitive- then it certainly shouldn’t be LSU.
If it’s not MSU because the series hasn’t been competitive- then it certainly shouldn’t be LSU.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 12:52 pm to AHM21
quote:
As an outsider, the OP is not wrong watching LSU vs Alabama has always been a prime time SEC matchup.
Have you been only watching football since Saban showed up at Alabama?
Few outside of the SEC cared much before then because it was just lopsided. OP had to go back to 25 years because that conveniently is the most favorable span he could find and it was still 15-11 in Alabama's favor the past 25 years.
If you actually started the year it got interesting (2007), the record is 14-5 with LSU's wins coming by a combined 19 points. Alabama has 5 wins of 19 or more points over that time frame.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 12:56 pm to PurpleSingularity
Alabama is 57-27-5 against LSU all time, 8-2 over the last 10 and 13-7 over the last 20. There is only one decade, ever, when LSU had a winning record against Alabama. That was when Saban was at LSU and the Mikes were at Alabama.
If Alabama goes to Sankey it will be to lobby to keep LSU on the schedule.
If Alabama goes to Sankey it will be to lobby to keep LSU on the schedule.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 12:57 pm to Bamadog75
quote:
I don't think bama fans are sad if LSU stays a permanent game.
I agree. In fact, most Alabama fans expect our permanents to be Auburn, Tennessee, and LSU.
It'll arguably be the 3 toughest permanent opponents any other SEC team faces but considering Alabama owns Tiger Stadium (30-10-2 all time record in Tiger Stadium) it'll be like having an extra home game every other year
Posted on 8/24/25 at 12:59 pm to PurpleSingularity
quote:
that Alabama cried to the commissioner about being required to carry Tennessee, Auburn, and LSU.
As they should.
Who else in the conference would have 3 of the Big 6 as permanent rivals?
Easy for LSU fans to bitch about when they’ll almost certainly draw at least one permanent opponent who is a historical doormat.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 12:59 pm to AHM21
quote:I'm sure the baws will think I'm trolling here, but your logic is sound.
From a geographical standpoint, Miss State makes the most sense. Closest campuses in the conference. Alabama has played State more than Auburn, LSU and Tennessee.
If it’s not MSU because the series hasn’t been competitive- then it certainly shouldn’t be LSU.
I want Carolina to be UGA's 3rd perm because of campus proximity.
Posted on 8/24/25 at 12:59 pm to PurpleSingularity
They want Miss State because they have 243-4 record against them. Big rivalry! Don’t question it!
Popular
Back to top

44









