Favorite team:Auburn 
Location:Birmingham, AL
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:4130
Registered on:4/25/2022
Online Status:
 Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: Bye Dusty May

Posted by AUTiger789 on 6/22/26 at 10:10 am to
quote:

don't see him leaving until they are all graduated


Nate Oats: noted family man

re: Bye Dusty May

Posted by AUTiger789 on 6/22/26 at 10:09 am to
quote:

I don't follow college basketball like I used to, but is Michigan really that much better of a job than what Oates has now?


Yes. Infinitely.

Michigan is a Top 10 job, IMO.

Bama is probably around the 35th to 40th best job with all things considered.
quote:

Texas vs Ohio State


This is really the main one. If Ohio State goes down early to an SEC team, that pretty much decides which league has the upper hand.

Oklahoma vs Michigan is a distant second since it deals with the Big10’s second program.

Bama vs FSU and LSU vs Clemson don’t matter anymore than Auburn vs Baylor, Kentucky vs Louisville, S Carolina vs Clemson etc. No matter what happens, we all know the SEC is stronger than the ACC top to bottom. The only real difference makers are SEC vs Big10 games.
I’ve been to games at:

Clemson
Georgia Tech
Kansas State
Notre Dame
Penn State
Syracuse
Troy
UAB
USC
Virginia
West Virginia

Probably best atmosphere other than PSU white out game was Kansas State granted it was a big game at night.
quote:

swap North Carolina with Clem and Duke for FSU in top 15


Nah. Both struggle to get 40k fans into a football game. And yes, they are big basketball brands but very few people care about basketball for 50 weeks of the year. If a regular season basketball game hits 1 million viewers, it’s a big deal.
quote:

Washington


???

This one does not fit.

When it comes to overall size of fanbase and how much attention these programs get on tv, here are your top programs (alphabetical order):

Alabama
Auburn
Clemson
Florida
Florida State
Georgia
LSU
Michigan
Notre Dame
Ohio State
Oklahoma
Penn State
Tennessee
Texas
Texas A&M

That’s your top 15. USC, Nebraska, and Oregon generate enough interest and are the only west coast teams to have fanbases with a pulse… so they would probably be included.

Wisconsin, Iowa, Ole Miss, Arky, Missouri, South Carolina, Kentucky, Nebraska, Miami, Indiana, Washington, Colorado, North Carolina, and a few others would be next in line IMO.
Yes. 1990 AU vs TN. Also 1994 AU vs UGA.

re: SEC football coach rankings

Posted by AUTiger789 on 6/16/26 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

Holy retard blaming Heupel for having a step back season during Covid.


He stepped back all three seasons compared to the year before. LOL

re: SEC football coach rankings

Posted by AUTiger789 on 6/16/26 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

Heupel has been one game away from being in the SEC title game in both 2022 and 2024.


Hang the banner!

The 2022 was by far Heupel’s best team (thanks in large part to Golesh as OC). That was by far his best.

But that 2024 team was mid. Yes they went 6-2 in SEC play but they lost to Arkansas (7-6)… their wins in SEC play were against teams that went 0-8, 1-7, 2-6, 3-5, 4-4 (OT), and 5-3 in SEC play…. That Tennessee team only played two opponents in the Final AP Top 15 and they lost by 14 and 25 points each time. 2024 Tennessee got one home win over the worst Bama team in 15+ years and otherwise just played a bunch of bad teams. They were exposed in the playoff.

re: SEC football coach rankings

Posted by AUTiger789 on 6/16/26 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

imo from the g5 ranks moving up I thought Golesh and Chesney were the best hires.


I wanted Sumrall mainly because he was the big name in the offseason. I admittedly hadn’t dug into Golesh’ record. But once I digested the hire, i came around. Considering what Golesh inhereted (both as OC at TN and HC at USF) and what he did to turn them around, I’m extremely excited about Auburn’s hire.

re: SEC football coach rankings

Posted by AUTiger789 on 6/16/26 at 4:16 pm to
quote:

Yes, and none were as successful at the Group of 5 as Heupel lol


Are you being serious? Heupel took over UCF program that finished #6 in the nation the year before he was hired. He then proceeded to run it into the ground going 12-1 his first season, 10-3 in year 2, and then 6-4 in year 3. He literally ran the program head first ibto the ground.

quote:

Got fired with a way lower winning percentage than Heupel, and y'all would trade your nuts to have not done that lol


Gus is actually a perfect comparison for Heupel only Heupel has far less success.

*Both came out of the gate hot
Gus went 20-7 his first two seasons and Heupel went 18-8

*Both had very successful offenses early on but both saw their offenses sputter as time went on… people figured out Gus’ offense and Tennessee hasn’t been the same since Golesh left.

*Both slid into mediocrity beginning year 3.

*Both won most of the games they were supposed to win. Gus was 55-9 against unranked opponents (85.9%) and Heupel is 38-5 (88.4%).

*Both won enough big games to keep the fans excited but lost more big games than they won. Gus was 13-27 against ranked opponents (32.5%) while Heupel is 7-15 (31.8%).

The only real difference is Gus won actual hardware in an SEC Championship (played for two) while Heupel hasn’t sniffed that opportunity, and Gus was far better at winning some truly massive games… Gus was 4-13 against Final AP Top 5 opponents while Heupel is 1-6.

Very good comparison only Heupel is Gus Malzahn 2.0 without any of Gus’ biggest accomplishments.

quote:

Auburn hired Heupel's old OC, who wasn't even as successful in the AAC as Heupel.


This is laughable. Heupel took a 13-0 UCF and turned them into a 6-4 team in three seasons. Golesh took over a USF team coming off a 1-11 season and turned them into a 9-3 team in three seasons. Absolute opposite trajectories.

re: SEC football coach rankings

Posted by AUTiger789 on 6/16/26 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

Feel free to make your own.


I’d love too, however I think you need to break them into five tiers. Let’s be honest… we all just want a coach who can win big games and compete annually for championships.

Right now there are five coaches who seem to fit that bill… another 5 returning head coaches who we’ve seen enough from to conclude they don’t fit that bill…

We’ve got 3 new coaches that show a lot of promise. Call me crazy but I’d rather go with one of these in hopes they could be great over someone who’s been at their school 5+ years and never been close to championship caliber.

Tier 1: Proven solid coaches

1. Kirby
2. Sark
3. DeBoer
4. Kiffin
5. Elko

Tier 2: Completely unproven in the SEC but show solid potential

6. Sumrall
7. Golesh (I prefer Golesh but do acknowledge Sumrall has a better record albeit Sumrall walked into much better situations both stints)
8. Silverfield

Tier 3: mediocre coaches capable of building a decent program but have proven they aren’t likely ever going to be elite.

9. Venables
10. Beamer
11. Heupel
12. Drinkwitz
13. Lea

Tier 4: completely unproven and hard to see them having major success

14. Golding
15. Stein

Tier 5: Enough of a stint to see this is going nowhere

16. Lebby
*Records at school they were at last season (full tenure) only
*For coaches fired mid-season, the full season record was counted for them
*using final ap top 25 rankings

.953- Kirby, Georgia (82-4)
.895- Elko, A&M (17-2)
.886- Kelly, LSU (31-4)
.884- Heupel, Tennessee (38-5)
.878- Sarkisian, Texas (36-5)
.846- Kifffen, Ole Miss (44-8)
.844- Venables, Oklahoma (27-5)
.792- Drinkwitz, Missouri (42-11)
.778- DeBoer, Alabama (14-4)
.690- Beamer, S Carolina (29-13)
.658- Stoops, Kentucky (75-39)
.640- Freeze, Auburn (16-9)
.600- Pittman, Arkansas (25-18)
.581- Lea, Vanderbilt (25-18)
.467- Lebby, Miss St (7-8)

DeBoer has an excellent record against ranked opponents but his record against unranked teams is wildly disappointing.

How Jeff Lebby escaped being fired is amazing.

Four of the six lowest on the list all got fired last season.

Brian Kelly had a pretty good track record in these types of games… just struggled in the big games I guess.

re: SEC football coach rankings

Posted by AUTiger789 on 6/16/26 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

3. Clark Lea


This is batshite crazy. Clark Lea is 1-18 against ranked opponents since he got to Vandy. I understand grading folks on a curve sometimes, but this is ridiculous.

re: SEC football coach rankings

Posted by AUTiger789 on 6/16/26 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

Dude, Sumrall was probably the best hire of the offseason.


Sumrall is highly overrated IMO.

Against ranked power 4 opponents, Sumrall is 0-3 all-time (using final AP rankings). That’s not good but considering he was at Troy/Tulane the record was to be expected. However, it’s the lack of competitiveness in those games that raises numerous red flags. His teams lost those games by 29, 31, and 35 points. That’s not good.

re: SEC football coach rankings

Posted by AUTiger789 on 6/16/26 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

By what criteria would you say Venabals is better than Drinkwitz?


Is this some type of joke? Every criteria.

#1 Trajectory

Oklahoma went to the playoff last season. Missouri has gone two consecutive seasons without beating a ranked opponent (0-7 in such games).

#2 Big Wins

Venables is 5-15 against ranked opponents (25%). Not good at all but again he seems to be trending better. Drinkwitz is 4-18 (18.2%) and is going in the opposite direction.

#3 Beating the teams you’re supposed to beat

Venables is 27-5 against opponents finishing UNRANKED (84.4%). You really need to be above 80% or so at a minimum. Drinkwitz is 42-11 (79.2%) in this stat. Not great.

re: SEC football coach rankings

Posted by AUTiger789 on 6/16/26 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

his metrics are better than more than half the coaches in the league.


There will be six new HC at SEC schools out of 16 so that’s not saying much.

quote:

Sarks and Kiffin's numbers when you break them down like that are not impressive either.


These are not the same. Sark at Texas is 12-15 (44.4%) against final AP Top 25 opponents. Kiffin at Ole Miss was 11-11 (50%). Heupel at 7-15 (31.8%) and trending down is not in the same league as those other two.

quote:

By his career and numbers, he is a top 5 coach in the league.


Again there are only 10 returning coaches at their schools in 2026. Kirby, DeBoer, Sark, and Kiffin are worlds ahead of Heupel. If you consider trajectory, Elko and Venables should be rated ahead as well.

quote:

He is not going to get fired unless he has a losing season this next year


Yes I agree which says more about the state of Tennessee football in this era than it does about Heupel himself.

Heupel’s win% against ranked opponents (31.8%) is significantly worse than a lot of Big 6 coaches who have been fired. Les Miles (52.6%) and Ed Orgeron (47.8%) were both fired by LSU. Gene Chizik (43.5%), Tommy Tuberville (40.4%) and Gus Malzahn (32.5%) were fired by Auburn despite all having won an SEC Championship and all having a better win% against ranked opponents than what Heupel has now through five seasons at Tennessee.

Auburn gets a bad wrap for having coaches continually on the hot seat, but I guess it’s good we don’t put up with mediocrity like Tennessee seems to be okay with nowadays.

re: SEC football coach rankings

Posted by AUTiger789 on 6/16/26 at 12:08 pm to
Let’s be real about Josh Heupel…

Is he better than Derek Dooley and Jeremy Pruitt? Sure.

But he’s not an elite coach. He’s 7-15 against ranked opponents (using final AP rankings). That’s not terrible but also not great. Most Big 6 schools eventually fire coaches who fail to hit 35% win% against ranked opponents.

The problem for Tennessee is that his numbers are getting worse. Since the 2023 season, Tennessee is just 2-9 against ranked opponents. That’s typically a fireable offense when you consider that’s been over the last three seasons. Amazing that he seems to still be far away from the hot seat with that type of record in big games.

Since 2023, Tennessee is 2-9 against Top 25 teams. They are 0-9 against Top 15 teams. And they have 3 losses against teams finishing unranked. This is not a record that warrants a rating in the top half of the league.

re: SEC football coach rankings

Posted by AUTiger789 on 6/16/26 at 11:52 am to
WTF has Lane Kiffin ever actually accomplished??
quote:

You’re the one arguing that participation in a novelty jell-o shot competition at a bar is “desperation”. You’re making that point, not me.


The fans buying them in droves and the fans NOT buying them in droves are making the point. Tell me how the standings are not correlated. Just look at the dang board.