Started By
Message

How did the 12 SEC teams agree on these East & West permanent rivals for over a decade?

Posted on 5/9/24 at 12:17 pm
Posted by LSU Grad Alabama Fan
369 Cardboard Box Lane
Member since Nov 2019
10471 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 12:17 pm
Auburn - Georgia, Florida
Florida - LSU, Auburn
Tennessee - Alabama, Arkansas
LSU - Florida, Kentucky
Vanderbilt - Ole Miss, Alabama
Georgia - Ole Miss, Auburn
Arkansas - Tennessee, South Carolina
Alabama - Tennessee, Vanderbilt
Kentucky - MSU, LSU
Ole Miss - Vanderbilt, Georgia
South Carolina - Arkansas, MSU
MSU - Kentucky, South Carolina

I'm surprised they didn't have a written clause for MSU. Something like MSU couldn't represent the West in the championship game if they finish in a divisional tie for first place. Their East schedule was complete garbage and they should be ashamed of hanging a banner that one year.

Florida and Auburn were original members from the SEC. What idiots at those schools decided to bend over and take it. I assume Florida would have played for a few more BCS championships if not for Auburn being a thorn in their side. Auburn might of had another SEC championship with a better schedule.
This post was edited on 5/9/24 at 12:25 pm
Posted by ClusterCock
Myrtle Beach
Member since Oct 2018
71 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 12:56 pm to
South Carolina and Arkansas joined the league together in 1991, so that makes sense. As far as, South Carolina playing MSU, I've got no clue.
Posted by AU6X
Member since Sep 2019
90 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 1:04 pm to
You don’t know your history. At the time, Auburn had played UF more than any SEC team other than UGA (maybe MSU). Auburn’s main recruiting areas have always been the states of Alabama, Georgia and Florida. Auburn fought to have UF as an annual rival (and would never have fought to avoid having that game annually).

Of course the DSOR speaks for itself.
Posted by bgator85
Sarasota
Member since Aug 2007
6026 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 1:36 pm to
Auburn is one of our oldest rivals. Also happens to be the closest SEC school.

If the schools had known we'd have to drop to one rival one day, I'd guess the divisions may have been built differently originally.

This post was edited on 5/9/24 at 1:37 pm
Posted by Mstate
Birmingham
Member since Nov 2009
9752 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

I'm surprised they didn't have a written clause for MSU. Something like MSU couldn't represent the West in the championship game if they finish in a divisional tie for first place. Their East schedule was complete garbage and they should be ashamed of hanging a banner that one year.


Oh shut the frick up.

Hell, UK had mike leach as OC and Tim Couch at QB in 1998. I’d say they were hardly scrubs and they beat us anyway and we still won the west.

SEC football in the 90’s was a lot different than what we’ve seen the last 15 years. A hell of a lot more parity back then.

I’ll give you that the 1998 team was probably one of the worst to ever win the west but no one else did shite that year either. Our 99 team was way better than 98 and they didn’t win the west.
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
30710 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 1:51 pm to
Big6 vs Big6 was the money draw for CBS.

The cross Div schedule seemed unfair; but you had to have:

Uga v AU
Bama v Tenn

And therefore LSU was coupled up nicely with Florida



They knew what they were doing.
Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
16128 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

Florida and Auburn


Up until 2000 or so, Florida was our second most games other than Georgia.

Geographically we are the closest SEC school to Gainesville.

I miss the 10 team SEC.
Our schedule always had Tennessee in September, Florida in late October, Georgia and Bama in November.

We also played MSU every year.
The other teams rotated onto the schedule now and then.
Posted by DawginSC
Member since Aug 2022
4674 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 2:05 pm to
It was about rivalries, with other matchups filled in afterwards.

Auburn/UF used to be a big rivalry game. Many fans of both schools were disappointed when it stopped being a yearly contest.

Some of the other second matchups kept long standing matchups in place that weren't really rivalries. While UGA and Ole Miss didn't play them every year, we played them pretty frequently from 1966-1991.

It was a reasonable decision to cut down to 1 game, even though Auburn and UF missed their yearly matchup.
Posted by bigDgator
Dallas, TX
Member since Oct 2008
42149 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

Florida and Auburn were original members from the SEC. What idiots at those schools decided to bend over and take it. I assume Florida would have played for a few more BCS championships if not for Auburn being a thorn in their side. Auburn might have had another SEC championship with a better schedule.

Auburn is Florida’s oldest rival, even older than Georgia. Auburn is also the closest SEC school in proximity to Gainesville. It was a great game that I hated to see go.

Posted by TouchdownTony
Central Alabama
Member since Apr 2016
9806 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 3:07 pm to
You gotta remember that in 1990 when the divisions were put together, Florida was hovering just above .500 all time and coming off a 6-6 record i 1989. . the thought of Florida winning a national title was about like Ole Miss winning one. Auburn was a much stronger program. and the two had played forever. Certain teams weren't anything like they are today. Most people thought Arkie would come in and be a championship contender most years as they had been in the SWC.
Posted by gamecockman12
Columbia, SC
Member since Aug 2012
6104 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 4:00 pm to
I miss having Arkansas as a yearly opponent quite honestly. Those were some fun matchups.
Posted by redeye
Member since Aug 2013
8607 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 4:22 pm to
Our past history with Ole Miss and LSU was mostly forgotten by the time we joined the SEC. We hadn't played LSU since 1966 and Ole Miss wasn't much of a threat after that series was resumed in the early 80's.

Tennessee was the only SEC-e border state and it just made sense that we'd play them. As mentioned, we played SC because we were both new.
Posted by anc
Member since Nov 2012
18199 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:16 pm to
I can answer the MSU part

South Carolina was new and just randomly paired with MSU and they kept the newbies together.

Alabama had Tennessee, Auburn had Georgia and Florida, LSU wanted Florida

It was either Vanderbilt or Kentucky for MSU. Keep in mind, when these schedules were originally set, State was a top 25 club (They swept Texas in a home and home the first two years).

If you look at the '91 standings, the last of the 10-team SEC, State tied with Georgia for fourth and Kentucky went 0-7.

I won't argue that '98 State was one of the two worst SEC Championship participants ('95 Arkansas was terrible as well, but I think they had help via probation). But the West was awful that year. Four teams in the East would have won the West.

But unlike the '95 Hogs, State put up a fight in the actual championship game, and led midway through the fourth quarter.
This post was edited on 5/9/24 at 8:19 pm
Posted by GeauxTigers1410
Member since Sep 2020
1356 posts
Posted on 5/10/24 at 5:40 am to
Someone probably pointed this out but Auburn has always had the hardest schedule. In the 80’s before the division split, 4 out of the 5 annual games were Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Tennessee.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter