Started By
Message
Why is Sark successful at Texas and Jimbo is failing at A&M
Posted on 9/12/23 at 6:31 pm
Posted on 9/12/23 at 6:31 pm
Is it because Sark is a better coach or Texas is the better organization?
I don't have familiarity with the programs so I don't know
I don't have familiarity with the programs so I don't know
36
Posted on 9/12/23 at 6:32 pm to Beessnax
I think it’s premature to say Sark is successful. If he wins 10 games at UT this year I’d say he’s trending in that direction.
Posted on 9/12/23 at 6:32 pm to Beessnax
It’s because Jumbo loves to watch rival players PORK his wife
Posted on 9/12/23 at 6:33 pm to Beessnax
This is going to be a fun thread. 
Posted on 9/12/23 at 6:39 pm to Beessnax
When this year’s shitty lsu team beats Alabama will the board be reflecting on Brian Kelly doing a good job at LSU? Lmao
Posted on 9/12/23 at 6:44 pm to Beessnax
Because Sark is a competent Offensive Coordinator and QB developer, and Jimbo is a competent Bullshitter.
This post was edited on 9/12/23 at 6:45 pm
Posted on 9/12/23 at 6:47 pm to Beessnax
quote:
Is it because Sark is a better coach or Texas is the better organization?
It's not money. It simply is not. Hell of a question.
I honestly believe, at the end of the day, Sark is a cat that can analyze. Former drunk, sure. Maybe current drunk. But that's my point.
Sark is better drunk than Jimbo sober. And I really don't mean that as a shot. Sark can at least analyze. Jimbo is Jimbo. The cat that had to run from FSU.
A&M screwed the pooch taking Jimbo. Texas made a good hire with Sark. That's the difference.
Posted on 9/12/23 at 6:50 pm to Beessnax
Jimbo also beat Saban. In the end it didn't mean squat.
Posted on 9/12/23 at 6:51 pm to Beessnax
Sark has been trending in the right direction. Jimbo has not. Why?
Sark has built a very good organization from recruiting staff, to analysts, to his assistant coaches. It seems like Jimbo isn't as competent in that regard. Do people like working for Jimbo? Is he good at the "CEO" part of the job? I don't know, but from the outside it looks like the answer is no.
Sark has built a very good organization from recruiting staff, to analysts, to his assistant coaches. It seems like Jimbo isn't as competent in that regard. Do people like working for Jimbo? Is he good at the "CEO" part of the job? I don't know, but from the outside it looks like the answer is no.
Posted on 9/12/23 at 6:58 pm to Beessnax
Sark hasn't been successful at texsa yet.
Posted on 9/12/23 at 6:58 pm to Beessnax
So fisher has beaten Bama and he’s failing and sark beats them and he’s automatically successful?
I’ve seen this movie before with several other coaches. Ends the same.
I’ve seen this movie before with several other coaches. Ends the same.
Posted on 9/12/23 at 7:01 pm to Beessnax
Sark has had some epic meltdowns at Texas.
Lets see where they end up once the whole season is played.
They may find consistency and prove me wrong, but staying focused has been a huge issue for them.
Lets see where they end up once the whole season is played.
They may find consistency and prove me wrong, but staying focused has been a huge issue for them.
Posted on 9/12/23 at 7:41 pm to Beessnax
Simple. Sark’s offense is relevant. Jumbo’s offense is archaic.
Posted on 9/12/23 at 8:05 pm to Beessnax
One has a legit QB and encourages aggressive play calling.
One does not.
One does not.
Posted on 9/12/23 at 8:58 pm to Beessnax
quote:
Why is Sark successful at Texas and Jimbo is failing at A&M
You think 14-12 is successful? Dude, Jimbo has also beaten Saban.
Posted on 9/12/23 at 9:26 pm to Beessnax
quote:
Why is Sark successful at Texas and Jimbo is failing at A&M
Midfield Logos. Who knew?
Posted on 9/12/23 at 9:30 pm to Beessnax
quote:
Sark successful
You call the Alamo Bowl with a .500 record successful???
Posted on 9/12/23 at 10:18 pm to Beessnax
Sark can’t be called successful yet.
The other one is easy: No one is successful at A&M.
The other one is easy: No one is successful at A&M.
Posted on 9/12/23 at 10:34 pm to Beessnax
Sark winning one game against an unusually down Bama team hasn’t suddenly made Sark or Texas a big success. UTa has sucked for like the past 10-15 years and Sark has been a pretty sucky-below average coach up to this point. They got lucky and caught Bama early in the season before Saban has all the kinks worked out. Hell, didn’t A&M beat Bama in 2021 with their crappy back up QB? And last year the final score of the faggies/Bama game was 24-20 (I just looked it up). And the Aggies had a crappy 5-7 record last year. So, let’s not act like UTa beating Bama has suddenly made them some elite team and Sark a world class coach. They got lucky on Saturday is all that happened.
ETA- Texas really did end up with one of the easiest schedules for 2024. Funny how that worked out…
ETA- Texas really did end up with one of the easiest schedules for 2024. Funny how that worked out…
This post was edited on 9/12/23 at 10:37 pm
Posted on 9/12/23 at 10:42 pm to Beessnax
Eh sark has been a disaster outside of the past weekend
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News