Started By
Message

re: Cam Coleman is entering the transfer portal...

Posted on 12/29/25 at 4:23 pm to
Posted by pdfield34
Member since Aug 2022
586 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 4:23 pm to
Let's say Auburn offer is $2.5M.

If Cam Coleman feels that he can get $3.0M, that would be insane for him not to pursue that.

Given the current situation, it's basically insane for Auburn to invest more than $2.0M in Cam Coleman (but they are probably at least trying to retain him with more).

Any top 15 program with the right coach will be fine. The end is not near.
Idiot coaches will be exposed quicker than ever.
Posted by wareaglepete
Union of Soviet Auburn Republics
Member since Dec 2012
17616 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

and it has become so much more worse than just NIL, will ruin college football as we know it


For about the 1,000th time, it is not really NIL that is the problem. It is a transfer portal that allows players to transfer at will. With them coming and going every year, bidding wars develop and the prices go up and up and up. Then it becomes even more of a disaster. Not only can you lose a bunch of players every year, but the process by which this happens jacks up the price of getting players making it even harder to replace and build your roster.

TRANSFER PORTAL = #1 problem in NCAA football.

Posted by AUFiend
Member since Nov 2022
190 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 4:45 pm to
THIS!

Players deserve to get paid more than a scholly but being able to transfer every year for any reason they feel like is complete shite and is the REAL problem with this whole thing. until this gets fixed, CFB is just going to become more and more of shite show every year.
Posted by leeman101
Huntsville, AL
Member since Aug 2020
2452 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

We cant have it both ways Leeman. We were crowing like mofos the last two years when Preacher Hugh was buying up all the talent.


Utah is in the process of negotiating a deal with a private equity firm, Otro Capital out of New York that would land them a $500 million infusion of cash in exchange for a percentage of the programs revenue.
Posted by pirate75
Member since Jan 2011
854 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

I hope so. He could be the next coming of Coach Dye. Under Dye's first year he separated the men from the boys. For all we know all these players entering into the portal do not want to go through AG plans. Got a feeling AG is no more Mr. Nice guy like Freeze.


This. Can't scream for change in the program without being open to a complete overhaul.
Posted by NorthGwinnettTiger
Member since Jun 2006
53018 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 5:21 pm to
Yeah, but these kids these days ain't cut from the Dye/Bear/Dooley cloth.

It's almost impossible for me to lose my shite with AU and college athletics in general these days. Sucks, but at the same time, my B.P. is better for it.
Posted by awestruck
Member since Jan 2015
13340 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 5:22 pm to
quote:

TRANSFER PORTAL = #1 problem in NCAA football.
No salary cap.
Posted by AUX3
Member since Dec 2010
3870 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 6:16 pm to
QB position is most important. Oline is next
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
108223 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 6:17 pm to
quote:

For about the 1,000th time, it is not really NIL



Sure it is along with the transfer portal. They both are the problem. It needs to go to collective bargaining and contracts, you’re being naive or obtuse if you think kids coming out of high school are going for 7 figures is not a problem. The transfer portal wouldn’t be as big of an issue if money wasn’t being thrown around. There would be very little incentive to jump around every year.
This post was edited on 12/29/25 at 6:25 pm
Posted by CorchJay
Member since Nov 2018
21080 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 6:18 pm to
Dr Pepper fansville nailed it this year with the Dr Pepper (lemonade style) stand. Selling Dr Pepper for NIL. The one character comes up to purchase 1 Dr Pepper then gets called out because “he doesn’t want state to have the best players” and a booster had just purchased 20,000 cases of Dr Pepper
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
14362 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

I don't think AU has the resources (deep pocket boosters) to compete with the big boys especially the oil money guys of Texas, TAM and Texas Tech. We got Yellowfellow and only $30 million to spend. Even bama has various revenue sources.
I thought NIL was capped, across the board, at $30 Mil? Not many school can afford to fund it to the max, that puts us up there with the top schools, as far as funding. Now it's a whole other story on whether we throw a ton of it at a handful of players. Carson Beck is a prime example. He could've stayed at UGA and be in a better position for a natty ring, but Miami threw their checkbook at him and some are saying they overpaid. We definitely overpaid for Arnold!

Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
44982 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 6:38 pm to
No. OSU spent close to 40 this year.
Posted by metafour
Member since Feb 2007
4438 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 6:41 pm to
quote:

you’re being naive or obtuse if you think kids coming out of high school are going for 7 figures is not a problem


Why is this a problem? Every Pro sport operates on this model. The next generation of talent is always paid prior to them ever having proven anything.

A 5-star HS recruit is no different from a Top 15 NFL draft pick. You are committing millions of dollars to a player who has yet to actually produce anything, based off of expected future production. Cam Ward's rookie contract was for nearly $50M guaranteed, with over $30M coming in the form of a signing bonus. And he earned this without ever throwing a single pass against an NFL opponent. The Titans don't get reimbursed if it turns out that Cam Ward actually sucks.

In the MLB, teams routinely pay $1-4+M for 16 year old Latin American prospects every single year, the vast majority of whom wont ever even make it to the MLB. And this is outside of the normal Draft process, where untested HS or College players are paid even more if they are high draft picks.

College football is simply in a state where the actual value of talent has yet to be fully determined, and the big problem is that there are loosely enforceable "contracts" with no restriction on player movement. Once they limit player movement and start enforcing multi-year contracts, things will start to settle down. But a 5-star HS kid is still going to end up getting paid more than a 3-star kid, no different from how a 1st round draft pick is paid more money than a 4th round draft pick in the NFL.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter