Favorite team:US Space Force 
Location:Florida
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:13256
Registered on:1/9/2016
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Two down voters? I guess thy condone the IRS employees not paying their taxes while us plebs do…
It’s DC, what would you expect? Our judiciary is highly compromised. Time for military tribunals…
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.



Sen. Joni Ernst has revealed that IRS EMPLOYEES OWE ~$50,000,000 IN UNPAID TAXES.

Yes.

The people who enforce the tax laws… aren’t paying them.

Let that sink in.

Nearly 6,000 IRS employees, almost 10% of the agency, have significant unpaid tax balances.

Average amount owed? About $8,000 per employee.
These are not recent bills. Many are from prior years. Some didn’t even file.

This isn’t a clerical issue. It’s a credibility crisis.

These employees know exactly how the system works, what gets flagged, what doesn’t, and where enforcement is weak.

That’s not just hypocrisy.
That’s tax fraud risk inside the tax authority itself.

So here’s the real question: Should Scott Bessent put IRS employees with unpaid taxes on probation, just like any other federal worker?

Because, if the IRS won’t enforce the rules on itself, why should the public trust enforcement at all?

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


quote:

Good, at least there are some who follow the law and stand up against a fascist regime. This country has to stand strong against this idiot or there will be no coming back from him destroying it.


Have you seen this, Clark?? You really think Georgia is the only place fraud took place?? Michigan was full of frickery.

If they have nothing to hide, then why hide anything?

SFP will be along presently to let us know that all the audits matched and that there were clerical errors made, but the tallies matched.
quote:

Bill and Hillary are willing to testify, Will he? Never


Get ready for a steady stream of-
1. I don’t recall
2. At this point, What difference does it make?
3. It depends on what the definition of “is” is
4. But Trump…
5. Threat to our democracy

These two haven’t told the truth in decades, if ever.

re: More evil from the Epstein files

Posted by Placekicker on 2/10/26 at 2:52 pm to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


quote:

To protect and serve the party of one they have sworn loyalty to. Not us -not the constitution .....just one guy


Imagine still believing that Trump is compromised in those files.

Let’s face it- he and Elon baited them into releasing the files that will be the doom of the Left…

re: Sam Darnold California Tax Bill

Posted by Placekicker on 2/10/26 at 12:22 pm to
That itself is criminal. He has to pay California state taxes because he played a game there? And they don’t just tax his fan check? They tax his entire salary?

Is that what I’m reading??
SFP will be along presently to tell us that all of the audits matched, that he’s PERSONALLY counted them by hand, and that he’s been telling us for months now that there’s nothing to see here.

The fact that there are large amounts of data missing is inconsequential.
This is a great case study on what the Future Left will do if they get the presidency again.

It will make the Biden Presidency look like the Reagan one in comparison. They will go full communist.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


Read this. This is the plan of the Democratic Party. Protecting criminals? Destroying the nuclear family? And you support this by standing up with the Left…
Dude, Politico wrote an article about it. So, yes, Democrats did say this.

Here’s the Politico article…

A push to put body cameras on all ICE agents has Democrats running headlong into a new problem: fear that the technology will provide another avenue for mass surveillance of protesters.
Congressional Democratic leaders have made universal use of body cameras one of their prime demands for imposing accountability on Immigration and Customs Enforcement, especially after federal agents fatally shot two American citizens in Minneapolis. But after an outcry from privacy advocates that surveillance tools will allow ICE agents to identify and track protesters, Democrats are also calling for restrictions on how the body cameras can be used.
Lawmakers and legal observers have accused ICE of leveraging a variety of cameras to surveil protesters, feeding pictures into license plate readers and facial recognition systems. Democrats now worry that the body cameras they’re demanding could be used for similar purposes.
Democrats have proposed legislation to limit ICE’s use of facial recognition, but the proposals are unlikely to advance without bipartisan support.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer say they want to tack on restrictions to how ICE can use body camera footage, according to a letter sent to Republican leadership on Wednesday night.
“Prohibit tracking, creating or maintaining databases of individuals participating in First Amendment activities,” the letter says.
It’s unclear how the request for new limits on surveillance will affect ongoing negotiations with Republicans to pass a funding bill for the Department of Homeland Security. Republicans already agreed to provide more funding for body cameras for ICE officers before Democrats began pushing for limits on how the images are used.
A spokesperson for Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chair Mark Warner (D-Va.) told POLITICO that Democrats are lining up behind leadership to push for the restrictions, fueled by reports of ICE tracking protesters. DHS launched an internal investigation on ICE’s use of surveillance after Warner sent a letter flagging privacy worries.
Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), who proposed a ban on ICE agents using facial recognition, also supported surveillance limits on body cameras.
“Obviously we want them to be wearing body cameras, but we would want restrictions placed on what that information could be used for,” Markey said. “We want to make sure that we have the accountability for how these officers conduct themselves on the streets of our country, but we don’t want it in turn to be used as a way of coming back and suppressing free speech.”
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said President Donald Trump would not accept any deals that undermine ICE’s enforcement capabilities.
“I know Sen. Schumer and Leader Jeffries sent over a very long list of demands, some of which the administration is willing to discuss. Others don’t seem like they are grounded in any common sense and they are non-starters for this administration,” she said at a press conference on Thursday.
quote:

It’s 2026. Every LEO in this country should be wearing a body cam, it should be running their entire shift, and they should not be allowed to mute it. Period.


I agree with you. If I was a Cop, I’d want it for my own protection as well. I could prove what happened and it’s not my word against theirs.

The point of the thread was to show that the Left is now flip flopping on the idea of body cams now that the footage is being used against them.

I found that humorous and wanted to share.
This is the next generation of the Left, ladies and gentlemen. The entitled, never told no, digital generation. Their brains have been hardwired since they entered school that socialism is good and anyone who doesn’t think like them is the enemy. They grew up on cancel culture. They grew up doxing people, cyber bullying.

I can’t imagine standing up for the Party that’s creating and condones this.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


"Protesting" kids dictate to an older man where he's allowed to walk.

One girl yells, "F*CK OFF!" at him. Mob follows him aggressively.

Democrat kids are out of control. Going to be way worse than their rabid parents.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


In 2017, an autistic white kid in Chicago was abducted and tortured by 4 black suspects, livestreamed online

Don Lemon: "I don't think it's evil"
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


Democrats are flipping the script AGAIN, pushed like crazy for body cams on cops to “hold them accountable,” but now whine that ICE using them could invade protesters’ “privacy”!

So which is it, folks?

Transparency when it suits their narrative, or straight up surveillance paranoia?

Can’t have it both ways. The hypocrisy is off the charts!
He’s so cute to think that the Mayor of New York can override the will of the Federal Government…
quote:

“To be fair, maybe this whole connection is a bit of a stretch, but in the end, it really is one big company that runs everything. Using your childhood photos to train a facial recognition deep learning database to eventually establish a global mass surveillance state that is constantly watching your every move from the second you enter this world — That's who took your school photos”


These people are purely evil…