Started By
Message
re: Our football coaches' Twitter presence is really dumb
Posted on 2/12/18 at 3:50 pm to Stonehog
Posted on 2/12/18 at 3:50 pm to Stonehog
quote:
No shite. I can still call out Mickey Mouse clown shoes bullshite when I see it. Hard to respect a guy who acts like a jackass on twitter all day, and we have an entire staff doing it.
what should our Twitter presence look like?
why should coaches not be pushing the envelope and talking about kids on twitter and talking them up? because stonehog thinks it looks stupid or is it detracting from recruiting?
1
Posted on 2/12/18 at 4:27 pm to Stonehog
Stupid arse thread....
Posted on 2/12/18 at 4:32 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
what should our Twitter presence look like?
More professional, less clown penis so our coaches can retain a shred of dignity. Right now it's embarrassing.
Posted on 2/12/18 at 4:54 pm to Stonehog
quote:
Well that's a fact.
Not even close. We signed less players than ever is what you’re meaning to say.
Posted on 2/12/18 at 5:06 pm to TheCheshireHog
quote:
Not even close. We signed less players than ever is what you’re meaning to say.
Bro, you can sugar coat it all you want if it makes you feel better but this is the worst class we have ever signed. That's a fact.
Posted on 2/12/18 at 5:07 pm to Stonehog
quote:
Hard to respect a guy who acts like a jackass on twitter all day, and we have an entire staff doing it.
Bert acted like a jackass in public and to the media all day. That’s way worse than appealing to recruits.
quote:
Maybe our coaches could take some classes there because they just signed our worst class in history...
Do you realize how fricking stupid you make yourself look when you COMPLETELY ignore circumstance?
Posted on 2/12/18 at 5:09 pm to The_Joker
quote:
Do you realize how fricking stupid you make yourself look when you COMPLETELY ignore circumstance?
This is our lowest ranked class in history, true or false?
Posted on 2/12/18 at 5:10 pm to Stonehog
Not by average recruit rating, but by how classes are ranked, true. Have you ever asked yourself why?
Posted on 2/12/18 at 5:14 pm to The_Joker
quote:
by how classes are ranked, true.
Yeah no shite!
quote:
Have you ever asked yourself why?
No, can you tell me?
Posted on 2/12/18 at 5:15 pm to Stonehog
quote:
Bro, you can sugar coat it all you want if it makes you feel better but this is the worst class we have ever signed. That's a fact.
Once again, also the best defensive class in 10 years. Tear it down all you want if it makes you feel better. But that's a fact.
6 5.7+ defensive players recruited in a few weeks vs 11 for Bret's entire tenure.
What was the primary reason we lost so many games the last two years? Defense.
This post was edited on 2/12/18 at 5:19 pm
Posted on 2/12/18 at 5:20 pm to HogX
quote:
the best defensive class in 10 years.
Let me guess, by average rating?
Posted on 2/12/18 at 5:23 pm to Stonehog
quote:
No, can you tell me?
I’d be happy to.
When the staff got here, the existing class Bert put together was a disaster and sitting the 90s after he lost every fricking SEC game. Then after virtually no time to recruit at all, the experimental early signing period wiped 75% of the recruits out there off the board. Morris & Co run a system that’s the opposite of the one Bert ran us into the ground with, so we weren’t on the radar for any recruits that would fit the new system. On top of that, the in-state class was terrible. On top of THAT, we had the smallest number of scholarships available for recruits that we’ve had probably ever.
Did you understand that or do you need pictures?
Posted on 2/12/18 at 5:25 pm to The_Joker
How many scholarships did we have available?
Posted on 2/12/18 at 5:29 pm to Stonehog
quote:
clown penis
You seem very knowledgeable on this subject.
Posted on 2/12/18 at 5:30 pm to ThundrHawg
Say hi to your dad for me.
Posted on 2/12/18 at 5:33 pm to Stonehog
quote:
Let me guess, by average rating?
Do my non-quantifiable numbers not count as much as your non-quantifiable numbers? Considing we had 10 actual scholarships to offer for this class (we had 75 scholarship players on campus prior to signing day), that's about all we can go by.
As I said, he signed more than half as many of those guys in 2 months as Bret did in 5 years. Sorry it doesn't fit your narritive.
Posted on 2/12/18 at 5:36 pm to Stonehog
quote:
How many scholarships did we have available?
Less than they signed.
Posted on 2/12/18 at 5:37 pm to Stonehog
quote:
How many scholarships did we have available?
10 or 12. Can’t remember exactly
Posted on 2/12/18 at 5:38 pm to HogX
Here's a little thought experiment for you to show how retarded your logic is. This is for Cheshire too:
If Arkansas only signed one player and ranked dead last in the country in recruiting rankings, but the player was a 5 star, would you say it's not the worst class ever because the average star rating is 5? If it was a defensive player, would you say it wasn't the worst class because Bert never signed any 5 stars on defense?
If Arkansas only signed one player and ranked dead last in the country in recruiting rankings, but the player was a 5 star, would you say it's not the worst class ever because the average star rating is 5? If it was a defensive player, would you say it wasn't the worst class because Bert never signed any 5 stars on defense?
Posted on 2/12/18 at 5:39 pm to Stonehog
quote:
If Arkansas only signed one player and ranked dead last in the country in recruiting rankings, but the player was a 5 star, would you say it's not the worst class ever because the average star rating is 5?
If we had 1 scholarship available and signed 1 5 Star then of course I wouldn’t say it’s the worst class ever. I’m not an idiot.
Page 3 of 7
Latest Arkansas News
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News