Started By
Message

History Discussion Thread

Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:18 pm
Posted by CrimsonBoz
Member since Sep 2014
20590 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:18 pm
I know its not football but hey, lets have fun.

Diego, Kerrygold, and Amarillo I belive we left off here.

Diego said this "The thing that created the Prussian/German war machine was the existential terror of a French army rolling over the Rhine.

Ultimately, the reason France got rolled over in WW2 was decided by the cementing of Belgium as an independent state. Belgium is basically a design feature by the rest of Europe to keep France from being able to annex and fortify the Belgian low countries thus changing the paths for invasion from the North into France.

I'm a bit less dismissive of France as a military power. However the inability to solidly claim and hold the low countries is their real failure but, in fairness, the whole of Europe was determined to never let that geographical fortress France stand for long."

Amarillo said this "Gonna have to disagree with you on why France got their asses kicked by the Germans. The French did little to change their mindset on warfare from WWI and WWII. They assumed that massive fortifications (e.g. Maginot Line) would make all the difference.

It never dawned on them those fortifications would be breached and/or flanked and because of that, they had no real answer to German blitzkrieg and rapid advances of armor and troops through those breaches.

Moreover, German weaponry was superior. Better tanks, better small arms, better artillery, better aircraft. Better trained men and superior leadership."

My thoughts: I think you're both half right. Amarillo, the "better weapons" part is iffy. The French and British had more tanks in May 1940, and the Char B1 and Somua S35 outgunned and out-armored most of what the Germans fielded. The real German edges were radios in every tank, a Luftwaffe built for close support, and concentrating their armor into panzer divisions instead of spreading it out in infantry support. The Maginot Line also did its job: it shut the direct route and pushed the Germans into Belgium, which is exactly what it was for. The failure was the Dyle plan sending the best French armies deep into Belgium, leaving the Ardennes hinge to reserve divisions, and keeping no strategic reserve at all. Once Guderian was over the Meuse at Sedan, a headquarters with no radio and a 1918 mindset just couldn't react at the speed required.

Diego, you're right that Belgian neutrality in 1936 mattered. It killed joint planning and is a big reason the Allied plan was a headlong rush north with a thin hinge behind it. But France fought 1870 and 1914 with the same map, and in 1914 it held. What changed by 1940 wasn't the geography, it was the French army's ability to move and decide. Doctrine and command lost that campaign, not walls, weapons, or borders. Love this.
Posted by UASports23
Basketball School
Member since Nov 2009
26513 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:33 pm to
We didn't have equality in those times. if we had women in the war. We would have won in September 1944.
Posted by McGregor
Member since Feb 2011
7225 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:34 pm to
WWII history is the best. I mean those boys >
Posted by Fells
Member since Jul 2015
4373 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:44 pm to
I'm not a huge millitary history buff, but I always thought that France's failures in WW2 were an extension of their failures in WW1: ego.

They were convinced that their superior fighting spirit would be the key to dominating WW1 battlefields and they sent all their best troops to basically be slaughtered by modern weaponry and tactics. So by the time trench warfare set the lines they had already lost their best troops and on-field leadership.

So WW2 comes and they basically are thinking the same thing. They had beat Germany's western advance solidly before the treaty of Versailles and thought that was the best Germany was capable of. So they hunkered down with a bunch of defensive fortifications and then Germany just went around them.


More posted this to be corrected as I'm more knowledgeable about the politics and political theory of the early 20th century as opposed to the millitary history.

Posted by Kashmir
Member since Dec 2014
10379 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 7:47 pm to
the Greatest Generation!
Posted by Diego Ricardo
Alabama
Member since Dec 2020
13937 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 8:10 pm to
Truly a terrible but fascinating time in history. Nothing but respect for the greatest generation. They lived through some terrible times but we are all blessed for their sacrifices.
Posted by McGregor
Member since Feb 2011
7225 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 8:12 pm to
I hate to hate on France too much. They saved us a time or two.
Posted by Robot Santa
Member since Oct 2009
46486 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 8:21 pm to
Their reputation as cheese eating surrender monkeys isn't very deserved. For much of its history as a geopolitical entity France was the military boogeyman of Europe.
Posted by Diego Ricardo
Alabama
Member since Dec 2020
13937 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 8:26 pm to
I think the Marquis de Lafayette is a very interesting historical figure. A young French officer in Washington's cadre during our Revolution. He was a central figure in the "good" part of the first French Revolution. In his later days, he helped assure the Revolution of 1830 did not have a repeat of the terrors before offering the throne to Louis-Phillippe.

Posted by SECSolomonGrundy
Slaughter Swamp
Member since Jun 2012
18624 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 9:01 pm to
quote:

the Marquis de Lafayette is a very interesting historical figure


Absolutely. He is the real life Batman. Rich orphan who spent his fortune fighting the bad guys.

Incredible story on that guy.

And to the point of WW2 France paying for the sins of WW1 France, it can also be argued that WW1 France was set in motion from their supporting the USA in our revolution.

So much of that history is more connected than we are taught and the story of the Marquis De Lafeyette touches on so many parts of it. If you start with his father and then go until MDL is an old man, then you can get an interesting perspective on WW1.

But, personally, I'm in this camp nowadays. "All wars are bankers' wars" - Smedley Butler.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter