Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:1929
Registered on:8/28/2024
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Here's what you're missing. Lane's style of offense gets less effective in the redzone. Here's Lane's red zone TD rate for the past five and half years.

Season Red-zone TD rate National Rank
2021 61.2% 74th
2022 64.4% 47th
2023 65.6% 33rd
2024 59.0% 79th
2025 61.5% 51st
2026 67.3% 44th

In comparison, in each of DeBoer's first three years, his offense is very effective in the red zone:

2024 74.5%
2025 71.7%
2026 78.4%

There's enough of a pattern to have concern that what you saw last Saturday wasn't a one off.






quote:

Fair, but that doesn’t mean that the better team always wins the game.


The team that won was able to execute the biggest plays in the biggest moments of the game. The team that lost was in the same situation with the same opportunity and couldn't execute in the big moments. So, when one team shows it can execute in the game's biggest moments, but the other team cannot. Who is the better team?

re: Kamario Taylor resigns for $7.5m

Posted by NWLA_Bama on 11/13/26 at 8:11 am to
No he can't. He's not draft eligible until after next season.
It's possible. I just dont' see how he could have functioned under Saban at practice and during games being a drug addict. Cochran wasn't a position coach and though his job was important, he was limited to S&C, not putting together game plans and running through practices where Saban was constantly breathing down his throat.
quote:

Damn, Bama gonna have to pay an arse of money to Kleeon


I'm not certain any team (whether they can pay it or not) is going to pay what I'm sure he and his agent are going to request after this season. This is like the NFL now, you can pay your QB a crap load of money, but if there's nothing left for the other starters, does it really do you or the QB any good? No amount of money makes it enjoyable for a player to be on a team that's losing. So my guess is, Keelon is going to have to make a decision on whether he wants all the money and not a very good supporting cast, or wants to take enough money to still make him rich but leave enough to field a competitive team.
He has always had involuntary facial tics from what I remember. He had them at Alabama when we all know he was clean under Saban. I don't think the guy is on meth or any drugs. I think he has some facial tics that maybe tied to stress/anxiety or maybe a mild case of turrets.
quote:

Weren’t you guys set to fire him earlier this season?


Bro, Alabama fans are set to fire any coach after one game. We run our coaches on a game to game contract. It is a true "what have you done for me lately" relationship. Where have you been?

re: Tennessee fans are hilarious.

Posted by NWLA_Bama on 11/13/26 at 7:07 am to
No, Tennessee fans are actually retarded.
quote:

Why do you think he has better talent?

You constantly rebuff the idea that DeBoer took over a top talented roster, yet parrot the idea that LSU bought a top talented roster in one offseason.

What is any of this based on?



One reason is because just from the naked eye watching on TV, LSU was bigger and faster at most positions compared to Alabama. As a matter of fact, I'm involved in a group text thread with about 10 other Bama fans during games and the common thing that was said by most of them when watching the game was "Man, LSU's players look so much bigger and faster than ours", and to me, I couldn't argue with them because I thought the same thing.

Second, is that it was reported all off season how much money Kiffin had pumped into the program and him bringing in the top ranked portal class. This was even flaunted by LSU fans.

I didn't say DeBoer didn't have any talent in his first year; I'm saying after transfer outs once Saban left he wasn't left with the same level of talent had before he retired. We had A LOT of key talent leave with under developed talent left. DeBoer had talent, just not the "loaded" team people want to claim he did.

I don't think you LSU fans realize the type of talent your team has maybe because you watch them every Saturday. You've got an uber talented team with NFL talent all over the roster. The problem is, you've got a coach who has yet to figure out how to win in the pressure moments and in the pressure games. If he ever figures that out, y'all will put together multiple NC's.
quote:

Saban left Deboer a championship caliber roster, but Deboer has failed to deliver a championship so far. He is a good coach, I will give him that. He has kept the Bama ship afloat winning games, sans championships.


No he didn't. Within two weeks after Saban retired the majority of the top players left, and any "talent" that remained was young and much, much less developed. So stop with the Saban left DeBoer a championship roster. That's a bunch of BS if I've ever heard it.

Whereas Lane was basically handed a blank check to replenish his roster with anybody he wanted and he basically did just that. The problem is Lane is doing what Lane does and that's screw up a sure a thing. He can't win the big game, never has been able to win them and showed again last weekend that he continues to can't win, even when he has the better talent. DeBoer's defense shut Lane's "potent" offense down when it mattered the most. Lane's offense is just like his coaching career. It looks great in between the 20's ,but when it gets to where it matters, it can't score td's. That is exactly how Lane coaches.
Kalen DeBoer had a boatload of talent walk off campus when Nick announced he retired and didn't have $40 million at his disposal to try to convince them to stay. Though there was still talent left, it wasn't near what other fans like to say he had and it showed.

DeBoer was in no way gifted what Lane's been gifted at LSU in his first year. Lane's just doing what Lane does and that's make messes of situations.
Texas, Ohio St, Oregon, Texas Tech. Texas A&M, just for starters, spent 30-40 million in that same year, with both Texas and Ohio St. spending at least $40 million each. So, no, Alabama wasn't at the top end when DeBoer was hired.
He didn't have in his first year what Lane had dumped in the program. No where close. As a matter of fact, the numbers going around during that time was around $20 million, nowhere close to the $40+ million Lane had.
quote:

The SECCG is worth 80-100 million, which means the league office and university presidents basically caved for an extra 5 or 6 milllion dollars per year per school smh.


Yep, that's about what it amounts to. They sold out a wonderful tradition in the conference championship game for six more million per year that inflation will cut by 25% in just a few years. Bunch of money whores.
If DeBoer would have had $40+ million dumped into the program in his first year he probably could have. :cheers:
quote:

Until I see otherwise i will concede that.

I will point out that Coach D took over the finest run football team in the world.

Kiffin took over whatever BK left behind.


Stop. Just stop. Lane had $40+ million pumped into the program to assemble a roster. That is the type of money Ohio St dumped into it's roster two years ago when they won the NC. In no way is Lane playing with "what BK left" in any form or fashion. If there are any of BK's players playing, it is because Lane thought they were extremely talented. What you saw this past Saturday (in big games) is exactly what you're going to get from Lane whether he's in year 1 or year 5. The stupidity at which he coaches in big games is impressive and he's done it his entire career.
They did all of this to what basically nets to $155 million more dollars pure year in overall revenue. The juice isn't going to be worth the squeeze, imo.
quote:

Congrats to all of the also rans throughout history who can now claim that “they would’ve made the playoff”. The whole thing is so stupid and ridiculous.


Welcome to a microcosm of our society. Lowering standards and celebrating that you did just as good as those before you. :cheers:

re: Vandy by the Numbers

Posted by NWLA_Bama on 11/12/26 at 10:51 am to
Do they still run the time sucking offense they did when Pavia was there? Lord, I remember all they had to do was get like two or three first downs and they could suck 3/4's of the time out of a quarter.
I guess I missed it, but what coach and/or players are "begging" not to play?

Heck, in today's sports landscape with the type of athletes we have today, it wouldn't surprise me one bit. Things have changed a lot since I played ball.
I think whether it is worth it or not depends on how it all plays out. If you're playing the SECCG, win the game, but your quarterback blows a knee out in the fourth quarter and is out for the season, and it cost your team a national championship. At that point, was the game "worth it" to you?