Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:1579
Registered on:8/28/2024
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: Interesting take on Bama -

Posted by NWLA_Bama on 2/9/26 at 4:50 pm to
Nick is the one who hired the guy we still currently have because under Cochran, we were having too many major injuries. Nick went a different direction with the S&C program and we've sacrificed strength and power for not having as many major season ending injuries.

But there's no doubt that in the latter part of Saban's tenure and the first two years of DeBoer's, our team, especially the offensive line, isn't anywhere as phsyical as years past. The common denomiator is we have the same S&C when it started declining under Saban and the first two years of DeBoer.
Sabans retirement was sudden, caught the university off guard and was not the best of timing. Its not like Byrne had months to do a search, take his time and explore all options. Nick was more than likely not in any frame of mind to jump in and help. He was processing the reality of his retirement and his future. The hiring process moved very fast.

But it doesn't matter if Nick helped, didnt help, advised Lane or didnt. It doesn't change anybody's reality. Its a "what if" conversation which falls into the same category as "If my aunt had nuts she'd be my uncle."
Everybody's undefeated in the offseason with big hopes and dreams.
quote:

Was Alabama just not willing to give him a decent offer to return?


He was wanting to turn pro more than he wanted to come back. He was more than welcome back to Alabama and it wasn't about the money. After his dad got all first round grades from the NFL teams his decision was made. The QB class this year is weak and there are teams needing qb's. Whereas next year, the QB class coming out is stacked compared to this year's. They made a business decision.
We didn't receive any benefits. The SOS argument is bogus because the committee doesn't hardly pay attention to SOS. They pay attention to W's and L's. Sankey bent the conference over a barrel.
We're all doing it. Dabo was just the first coach to put a school on front street and send evidence to the NCAA. My guess is, a lot of coaches are waiting to see what the punishment will be and if it's of any significance, you'll see a ton of programs being turned in, including your's and mine. It's the wild, wild west right now and the majority of schools worth a crap are doing whatever they can get away with.

re: DeBoer - Pressure is Real

Posted by NWLA_Bama on 1/29/26 at 10:41 am to
quote:

The job IS a pressure cooker but I'm 100 per cent sure he already knew that coming into the job and if not, I guarantee you CNS told him it was and to be prepared for it. Then again, the man is making, what, $12 million a year? You don't get paid that kind of money with a job NOT having a lot of pressure.

I'm sure he knows he's on the coaching hot seat this year. That alone will age a man.


Thank you! He's being compensated for having to deal with the pressure of the job. Matter of fact, there are people in "real world" jobs who deal with exponentially more pressure than he does and aren't paid a fraction of what he makes.

I also think pressure from the fans can be a good thing because it keeps any coach from getting complacent and just drawing a paycheck.

re: Adrian Klemm

Posted by NWLA_Bama on 1/27/26 at 9:45 am to
No, to make it Shula 2.0 DeBoer wouldnt have made staff changes at all.
quote:

the decline.


Honest question. Anybody with one brain cell KNEW there would be a drop off aka "decline" when Saban retired. The lions share of Alabama fans expected it.

Rival fans like yourself have latched onto the term "the decline" and talk about it as if Alabama has gone 6-6 and 7-5 the last two years. When in reality "the decline" has been 9-4 and 11-4 with two of the four losses in year two being in the post season.

Is "the decline" as severe as you thought it would be? If possible, I'd like an honest adult answer, not sarcasm and snark. Thanks!
If the kid from South Carolina comes back I'll throw his name in there. I think his name is Stewart. The dude is a dog.
The key for Golding is going to be hiring assistants that are better than him at what they do. If Pete's the smartest guy in the room he wont be there long.
Yep, I agree with everything you said. No one expected him to replicate what Saban did but not look like we have in some games. He's got his third year to show improvement and possibly a fourth year if year three shows promise.
D to C-

He's underperformed too much to give him anything higher
I think its smart going to two people working with the OL. The NFL does this because it gets more one on one coaching for the players.
DeBoer isn't going to be able to run the exact offense he ran at UW. He's going to have to shift to having more power run in his scheme. He's not in the PAC 12 anymore. Michigan exposrd in the championship game what gives DeBoers offense fits, and thats physical defenses. Every physical defense we've faced has given us trouble, even the games we ended up winning.
Goodman wakes up everyday thinking of crap to criticize Alabama about. He's a dbag.

re: Mike Johnson on Bama offense

Posted by NWLA_Bama on 1/23/26 at 6:29 pm to
I agree, the last several years under Saban we were getting pushed around. I've said for several years the S&C coach needed to be changed.

The lack of physicality has continued under DeBoer and seemingly gotten worse year over year. I just hope DeBoer isn't like Shula and is too loyal to his staff. If coaching changes need to be made, he needs to be able to make them.

re: Mike Johnson on Bama offense

Posted by NWLA_Bama on 1/23/26 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

f you listened to what he said he also said both Indiana and Miami needed a lot of those "IF's" to go there way. So we aren't so far away to be pessimistic


Yep, he said that, to acknowledge the fact that any NC team has to have some "if's" fall their way, regardless of how good they are. That's always been the case.

But that doesn't contradict his points about some of the things he's seen on tape that if we don't get fixed, are going to keep us from winning a NC. It's not like we were a few unlucky bounces from playing for a NC. We've had an OL issue for two years now that got worse from year 1 to year 2. Some believe it's coaching, some believe its player type, some believe it's DeBoer's philosophy and some believe it is a combination of all of it.

At this stage no one knows for a fact what's caused the offense to not have any physicality to it, not be able to run block and basically get handled by defenses who are more physical than they are. But regardless of the why's, it's hard to argue that these things have existed in our program for two years under DeBoer. I don't think anyone WANTS the guy to be fired. I would hope everyone would want him to succeed. But getting out physicalled in football is a major bad red flag and that's exactly what has happened to us on offense for two years. Regardless of the why's, let's all hope that element gets fixed.

re: Mike Johnson on Bama offense

Posted by NWLA_Bama on 1/23/26 at 10:53 am to
quote:

The guy basically talked down the new talent, said he's pessimistic then followed that up by saying we can go on a run.


Did you even listen to what the guy said? LOL! Geezus dude, he said IF, IF, IF, IF they could get a running game going they could go on a run. IF, IF, IF. IF. Do you have any clue how "IF" fits into what he was saying? No way you listened to that all the way through. No way...

re: Mike Johnson on Bama offense

Posted by NWLA_Bama on 1/23/26 at 10:50 am to
Yeah, then you didn't hear it after the second year. After the last two years there are even more questions. Bad comparison.