Started By
Message

re: 2020 Recruiting Thread (SVP and Broderick Jones stay committed to the G)

Posted on 1/22/20 at 9:14 pm to
Posted by AmericusDawg
Member since Oct 2012
8577 posts
Posted on 1/22/20 at 9:14 pm to
Word usually travels fast in small towns that Kirby's landing on the fifty.

They're hustling around everywhere as another dead period starts 2/3 and lasts until March.

Thanks for the info

Posted by chillmonster
Atlanta, GA
Member since Dec 2018
5072 posts
Posted on 1/22/20 at 9:26 pm to
Evans is going to do what he does and there's no point thinking about him.

Dawgs are likely the #2 class in the nation when this is done, and I'm more than happy with that.
Posted by Coach7
GA
Member since Apr 2016
478 posts
Posted on 1/22/20 at 10:54 pm to
quote:

Coley might leave.


I saw a rumor of him going to A&M. I want him to stay. He’s a good WR Coach, recruiter, and assistant. Guy just isn’t a play caller in the SEC.
Posted by Coach7
GA
Member since Apr 2016
478 posts
Posted on 1/22/20 at 11:00 pm to
quote:

Monken runs a ton of formations with 3-4 wideouts and no tight ends.


He does use the H.Back though.
Posted by Coach7
GA
Member since Apr 2016
478 posts
Posted on 1/22/20 at 11:07 pm to
quote:

McConkey kid has just been straight up overlooked due to geography.


Yep. Not a lot of attention in that area unless you go to a private school. His brother plays at UWG and is a heck of a QB. Is it possible he will play QB?
Posted by Dawgsontop34
Member since Jun 2014
42477 posts
Posted on 1/22/20 at 11:32 pm to
quote:

Is it possible he will play QB?


Umm... no

His arm is not very good.
Posted by lambertdawg
South Forsyth County
Member since Sep 2012
912 posts
Posted on 1/23/20 at 8:38 am to
quote:

Is it possible he will play QB?

Doubtful since all his QB highlights are runs, no passes.
Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 1/23/20 at 9:15 am to
AD, why are we seemingly still recruiting and making so many scholly offers when we only have 2 spots still open after Jones and VanPran?

Currently at 21 with Jones and VanPran, and Cager and Wolf cost 2 of the 25 limit.

But we are still recruiting:

Rakestraw
Evans
Edwards
McConkey
Lundy
Kinnie
Williams
Jackson
Johnson
Huntley
Burch

Now at least 5 of those guys are either already committed elsewhere and/or are super longshots, of course, but they're still takes if they were to flip/choose UGA.

And the other 5-6 guys all appear to be takes, with priorities on another RB, which would then leave us only 1 spot remaining.

What are we telling these guys and how exactly are we managing this?

Is the NCAA about to remove transfer players from reducing the 25 limit or something?
Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
46421 posts
Posted on 1/23/20 at 9:17 am to
Not AD but I think they’re banking on the cap rule being done away with
Posted by Damn Good Dawg
Member since Feb 2011
47325 posts
Posted on 1/23/20 at 12:00 pm to
Wait, you sure you’re not AD?
Posted by AmericusDawg
Member since Oct 2012
8577 posts
Posted on 1/23/20 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

we only have 2 spots still open after Jones and VanPran?


We will take more than 2.

quote:

What are we telling these guys and how exactly are we managing this?



Won't be left hanging on signing day without options. The days of pool parties and watermelon buffets are gone.

Don't be surprised if there's more attrition and Grad Transfer chatter.

quote:

Is the NCAA about to remove transfer players from reducing the 25 limit or something?


The NCAA will likely try to make some adjustments to Grad Transfer rules. Waiting to hear what proposals are being discussed.

They'll try to prepare for everything that could happen.
Ex- Future OOC matchups are not just to try and "expand the brand", but also the likelyhood that there will be playoff expansion.



Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
3020 posts
Posted on 1/23/20 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

The NCAA will likely try to make some adjustments to Grad Transfer rules


I wish they'd also adjust it for early NFL departures. As it is right now, this 25 cap rule hurts teams that lose lots of juniors to the draft.
This post was edited on 1/23/20 at 12:42 pm
Posted by AmericusDawg
Member since Oct 2012
8577 posts
Posted on 1/23/20 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

Wait, you sure you’re not AD?


Tyler owns the Slam Sedan. I just drive it sometimes when my bike has a flat.
Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
46421 posts
Posted on 1/23/20 at 12:43 pm to
I thought I might be AD until I found out he and I had different definitions of “beaver hunting”
Posted by AmericusDawg
Member since Oct 2012
8577 posts
Posted on 1/23/20 at 12:45 pm to
Grad Transfers are helping most, but hurting some. Stanford has around a dozen or so looking to leave.
Posted by AmericusDawg
Member since Oct 2012
8577 posts
Posted on 1/23/20 at 12:53 pm to


I set many traps



Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 1/23/20 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

I wish they'd also adjust it for early NFL departures. As it is right now, this 25 cap rule hurts teams that lose lots of juniors to the draft.
I agree. Something similar to signing FA's/losing FA's determining how many comp-picks team's get in the NFL.

Everyone has the 25 limit. But if you have a junior that goes into the draft, a graduate that transfers away, or simply an underclassmen that transfers away, you get a +1 for every one that does. And if you bring in a graduate transfer or really anyone transfers in from another school, you get a -1.

And, of course, the 85 scholly cap could also cause a hard limit too. But logically the numbers should end up relative.

If we had something like this in place, we'd be able to bring in something like 30 new recruits. 25 - 2 (Newman & McKitty) + 7 (Fromm, Thomas, Wilson, Swift, Kindley, Mays, Reese).

This would also allow us to not have to count transfers against future classes, just as offsets to the class they are entering.

This would make loads more sense than what they are currently doing.

Right now, there's a flaw built in to the process. A team could bring in 25 new recruits each year, but if they lose enough juniors and seniors, along with outgoing transfers, they could effectively never reach their 85 scholarship cap without handing out scholly's to PWO's.

And that doesn't seem right. It's enabling potentially forced non-parity and disadvantages to schools who coach up kids who are good enough to leave early.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25568 posts
Posted on 1/23/20 at 2:04 pm to
I dont think it is as big an issue as being made in here.

25 schollies for 4 years is 100 schollies.
25 schollies for 5 years (redshirts) is 125 schollies.

You've got to get down to 85.
Two years ago, teams were finding ways to medical players or graduate players who didnt stay on the team (redshirts not taking a 5th year) or players transferring to a jacksonville state. Or the unfortunate team violations that are kicked off.

This is just a swing towards 85 from the 125/100 potential recruits over a 4+ year period.
Posted by AmericusDawg
Member since Oct 2012
8577 posts
Posted on 1/23/20 at 2:07 pm to
Taking 100 every 4 years and maintaining 85 with attrition is very tough.
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
3020 posts
Posted on 1/23/20 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

25 schollies for 5 years (redshirts) is 125 schollies.


But, players you redshirt are only available for four games. So if you redshirt 25 freshmen every year, have 85 total on scholarship, that leaves you with 60 full time players for the season. Obviously nobody does that, but the point is that a redshirt has a similar effect to other forms of attrition, player can't be a contributor for most of the season. Add in attrition from transfers, medical, early NFL departures and it still is problematic.
This post was edited on 1/23/20 at 2:20 pm
first pageprev pagePage 197 of 230Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter