Started By
Message
re: Since lane didn’t add them to roster
Posted on 9/5/26 at 7:54 am to LSUcajun77
Posted on 9/5/26 at 7:54 am to LSUcajun77
quote:
You literally can’t stop posting about LSU.
It's funny.
quote:
The level of trying so hard is at epic proportions.
No I don't think you get it. It's just really funny.
0
Posted on 9/5/26 at 7:56 am to Bamatide69
There are 2 spots open bud. This is far from over. Saban and CLK were game planning yesterday. Theres more to this than any of us realize.
Posted on 9/5/26 at 8:00 am to stopitnow1
I just figured drop the lawsuit since he followed rules but lane is lane and always had some type of plan
Posted on 9/5/26 at 8:00 am to stopitnow1
Gameday. Knock off the stupid shiite for a day and enjoy football!
Posted on 9/5/26 at 8:01 am to LVag1997
quote:
Gameday. Knock off the stupid shiite for a day and enjoy football!
There will be plenty of drama next week when there are no games!
Posted on 9/5/26 at 8:02 am to Sleepy_Tiger
You big mad! Panties bunched up in both of your cracks? 
Posted on 9/5/26 at 8:07 am to jonnyanony
quote:He should sue himself for being a dumbass all the way back to admitting Texas and Oklahoma and not getting a better handle on all of the NIL and Portal bullshite. It's ruined, has nothing to do with being a student athlete and everything to do with money. Fine, pay the players but a punter, quarterback and linebacker should all be paid the same and all teams are limited to the same amount. I don't care what that amount is but all teams pay the same. Different divisions can come up with that number. That's the only way we have any semblance of what it used to be. Doesn't change the cheating but we've dealing with cheaters forever.
He should sue them more, honestly
Posted on 9/5/26 at 8:08 am to olemissfan26
quote:LMAO.............LIVING IN PURE HOPIUM.
The players lawsuit against LSU for not rostering them is just getting started
Posted on 9/5/26 at 8:15 am to Bamatide69
Serious answer:
The federal suit won’t be dropped unless the Louisiana suit is dismissed (at least as to the SEC), but I would imagine that the SEC won’t press for a hearing this week. Maybe set a hearing for September 17 and see what happens. I’m sure Lane would prefer not to spend a day in Birmingham for a hearing when he has more important things to attend to.
The federal suit won’t be dropped unless the Louisiana suit is dismissed (at least as to the SEC), but I would imagine that the SEC won’t press for a hearing this week. Maybe set a hearing for September 17 and see what happens. I’m sure Lane would prefer not to spend a day in Birmingham for a hearing when he has more important things to attend to.
Posted on 9/5/26 at 8:16 am to Bamatide69
quote:
Does this mean sankey will stop the lawsuit?
Probably not. Kiffin left two spots open and can add them during the season, I think.
Posted on 9/5/26 at 8:19 am to geauxcoco
quote:
I just can’t wait for us to have representation at that hearing next week showing proof we have rostered no players with pro ties …but there are six other SEC teams trotting out players with pro ties or who are straight up ineligible and they are playing them anyway.
Being on a roster does not equal playing them. There are 105 roster spots. Not all 105 players will play. Sit back and watch. If one is played, then you have a leg to stand on.
Posted on 9/5/26 at 8:20 am to olemissfan26
quote:
The players lawsuit against LSU for not rostering them is just getting started
The players were very aware of this when they signed.
Posted on 9/5/26 at 8:49 am to geauxcoco
It’s almost like that’s not what the lawsuit is about….
Posted on 9/5/26 at 8:51 am to geauxcoco
LSU should want the federal case to continue.
By not rostering the players, LSU has the risk of Wright and Harris seeking damages from LSU (since as of today they are eligible but not rostered) and/or trying to hold LSU in contempt.
If the SEC wins in federal court, that removes the liability from LSU since they would then be ineligible to be registered.
By not rostering the players, LSU has the risk of Wright and Harris seeking damages from LSU (since as of today they are eligible but not rostered) and/or trying to hold LSU in contempt.
If the SEC wins in federal court, that removes the liability from LSU since they would then be ineligible to be registered.
Posted on 9/5/26 at 9:52 am to OleVaught14
quote:LSU is not a party to the suit in Baton Rouge. They are not risking contempt by not rostering the players. Unless Louisiana law is different from most other states, the players aren’t going to be able to sue LSU for damages. They might have claims on their NIL deals with whoever the contracting party is, but it won’t be the university or its officials.
LSU should want the federal case to continue. By not rostering the players, LSU has the risk of Wright and Harris seeking damages from LSU (since as of today they are eligible but not rostered) and/or trying to hold LSU in contempt. If the SEC wins in federal court, that removes the liability from LSU since they would then be ineligible to be registered.
Posted on 9/5/26 at 10:00 am to Bamatide69
They can still join the team later if they are enrolled in class. I doubt it's over.
Posted on 9/5/26 at 10:03 am to Bamatide69
I only hope we countersue and drag as much uncomfortable bullshite out of the closet this conference has.
Posted on 9/5/26 at 10:05 am to twk
quote:
LSU is not a party to the suit in Baton Rouge
The injunction yesterday enjoined LSU
Posted on 9/5/26 at 10:08 am to Bamatide69
No. Lawsuit will move forward.
Posted on 9/5/26 at 10:09 am to Bamatide69
I honestly hope the suit keeps going because LSU is going to eat that case alive.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News