Started By
Message
re: Since lane didn’t add them to roster
Posted on 9/5/26 at 10:11 am to Sleepy_Tiger
Posted on 9/5/26 at 10:11 am to Sleepy_Tiger
You are really really angry about this. No idea why.
0
Posted on 9/5/26 at 11:03 am to OleVaught14
quote:LSU is not a party to the suit. Period. Whatever order numbnuts local judge signed (and I’m not sure we’ve actually seen the written order), he can’t really order a non-party to do anything. Keep in mind also that pre-trial injunctive relief is usually limited to prohibitory relief (“Thou shall not do X”…rather than “Thou shall do X”…) as opposed to mandatory relief.
The injunction yesterday enjoined LSU
Posted on 9/5/26 at 11:06 am to Bamatide69
quote:
Does this mean sankey will stop the lawsui
I would be ok with stopping the lawsuit if the SEC puts LSU out the conference.
Posted on 9/5/26 at 11:27 am to LVag1997
Why are you replying to me bud. Tell this to the bama lintard who started the thread, gayboy
Posted on 9/5/26 at 11:30 am to Bamatide69
Sankey hasn’t even read the lawsuit.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News