Started By
Message
re: Would Mizzou have won their 2 div titles if they were in the west?
Posted on 6/17/20 at 11:46 pm to Mr Sausage
Posted on 6/17/20 at 11:46 pm to Mr Sausage
quote:
mizzou....ha ha ha
Yes, that team that you all NEVER beat.
1
Posted on 6/18/20 at 12:04 am to deathlock
quote:
Yes, that team that you all NEVER beat.
Did you sleep through 2012?
Posted on 6/18/20 at 12:31 am to kczoutiger
quote:
I still don't know how Steckel wasn't fired after that day, it was the worst coaching job I have ever seen, just an abysmal scheme change that wrecked us. That game was fun though.
Gary won't fire him because he was too loyalty.
Posted on 6/18/20 at 7:09 am to MizzouTrue
quote:
Auburn deserved the 2013 SEC Title. The SEC was stacked that year, I’d rate the teams Auburn, Bama, Missouri, Carolina, LSU.
Odd. The AP voters thought differently. We finished 4th and y'all finished 5th. We also beat that arse.
Posted on 6/18/20 at 7:21 am to Carolina_Girl
You won by a field goal in double OT. That's not an arse beating lol.
Posted on 6/18/20 at 7:48 am to MizzouFan13
We came back from a 17 point deficit with 5 minutes left in the game after our QB, who was sick with the flu, came in and led the team to the come back.
And your fans singing the "na na na na, hey hey hey,goodbye" song only to display epic surrender cobras at the end will never not be hilarious.
Doink.
And your fans singing the "na na na na, hey hey hey,goodbye" song only to display epic surrender cobras at the end will never not be hilarious.
Doink.
Posted on 6/18/20 at 8:24 am to momentoftruth87
quote:
Okay. How many nattys have the east won? Yeah, I thought so....
So now we are away from the "east was down" to well it didn't win a national title....interesting goalpost there.
Posted on 6/18/20 at 8:24 am to MizzouTrue
quote:
Auburn was better than LSU and they beat Bama far and square
I mean 2013 Auburn should’ve lost to a Georgia team (y’all lost to btw) that we stomped. 2013 LSU also lost to Ole Miss, another team we stomped
So the transitive property of Missouri beating UGA by 15 means they are better than LSU because UGA beat LSU by 3. Who can argue with that?
Oh wait, the transitive property of LSU beating Auburn by 14, who then beat Missouri by 17 says you're full of shite.
Solid work, and also the exact reason why using the transitive property is never a good idea.
Posted on 6/18/20 at 9:11 am to momentoftruth87
Would any east team have in the past decade?
Posted on 6/18/20 at 9:20 am to RB10
You lost at Oxford and Athens, two places we won at by two touchdowns
2013 LSU was good but Mizzou would’ve destroyed that defense. Our pass rush would’ve been tough to stop too. Too bad we never got to see it.
2013 LSU was good but Mizzou would’ve destroyed that defense. Our pass rush would’ve been tough to stop too. Too bad we never got to see it.
Posted on 6/18/20 at 9:58 am to MizzouTrue
It’s only June and we’ve already exhausted offseason threads to the 2013 Mizzou football team. Folks, I’m afraid if covid cancels 2020 we will be debating over the 1907 Harvard team being vastly overrated by the newspapers.
Posted on 6/18/20 at 10:47 am to Carolina_Girl
Did they get an award for their efforts in the end ?
Posted on 6/18/20 at 10:50 am to MizzouTrue
quote:
You lost at Oxford and Athens, two places we won at by two touchdowns
I literally just showed that the transitive property is useless.
quote:
2013 LSU was good but Mizzou would’ve destroyed that defense.
Maybe, maybe not. Auburn and Texas A&M both had better offenses. LSU held them to 21 & 14 points respectively. Alabama & UGA Both had worse offenses. LSU gave up 38 & 44 respectively. Where the game was played would be a pretty large factor.
You have no idea what Missouri’s offense would have done. Speaking in absolutes doesn’t help your case.
This post was edited on 6/18/20 at 10:53 am
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News