Started By
Message
re: Why do Mizzou fans have so much less animosity toward the Big12 than Ags?
Posted on 5/7/15 at 4:38 pm to NGATiger
Posted on 5/7/15 at 4:38 pm to NGATiger
They're orphans, they don't have a daddy.
They just wander from conference to conference looking for acceptance. They're just glad to be here.
Aggies, OTOH, are the bratty little brother who can't wait to get out from his brother's shadow - and gets sent off to military school where he learns to march and like boys.
They just wander from conference to conference looking for acceptance. They're just glad to be here.
Aggies, OTOH, are the bratty little brother who can't wait to get out from his brother's shadow - and gets sent off to military school where he learns to march and like boys.
1
Posted on 5/7/15 at 4:43 pm to NGATiger
Baylor tried to sue us to prevent us from leaving.
Posted on 5/7/15 at 4:45 pm to TeLeFaWx
And now they #WRTS. Imagine that.
Posted on 5/7/15 at 5:03 pm to NGATiger
I fricking hate the Big 12.
Posted on 5/7/15 at 6:44 pm to knight_ryder
quote:
Wish I played Tennessee, KENTUCKY, and VANDERBILT every year!
You can't play all the bottom feeders when you're one of the bottom feeders.
Posted on 5/7/15 at 7:19 pm to NGATiger
Mizzou was a founding member of the original conference now called Big 12. Texas was the rotten apple in the barrel. MU is the only university in state that was part of former conference. Aggies have to live with 4 other in state universities that are members of Big 12.
Even so, Aggies are no happier than Mizzou fans to be rid the Big 12.
Even so, Aggies are no happier than Mizzou fans to be rid the Big 12.
Posted on 5/7/15 at 7:21 pm to Bogie00
quote:
Even so, Aggies are no happier than Mizzou fans to be rid the Big 12.
Mizzou seems happier. Aggies seem to be wanting to give the middle finger.
Posted on 5/7/15 at 7:40 pm to Bogie00
quote:
Even so, Aggies are no happier than Mizzou fans to be rid the Big 12.
We're not only happier, but we take great pleasure in rubbing their faces in it.
We're not gracious winners in that regard.
Posted on 5/7/15 at 8:06 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
They just wander from conference to conference looking for acceptance.
Ummm... No.
Posted on 5/7/15 at 8:14 pm to NGATiger
quote:
Why do Mizzou fans have so much less animosity toward the Big12 than Ags?
Because Missouri fans know deep down that Missouri got wandering eyes and then got shafted by the Big 10, so the SEC move was a great way of saving face (even though the "blame Texas" mantra has permeated Missouri's revisionist history. See below for more on that).
A&M has been anti-Big 12 because they are fools. Fools in that their administration, in order to pull off the move they did, they had to have a boogeyman to rail against, and that boogeyman was Texas.
As you SEC people can see, the easiest way to whip an Aggie into a frenzy is to mention Texas, and their administrators used that to their advantage while they left the conference because of they were tired of getting outmaneuvered by Texas within the Big 12 apparatus. So they had to get away from them or forever suffer in their shadow.
Good for A&M, it was a bold move. But make no mistake, they were sold on the SEC move by stirring the pot against their former Texas brethren, whom they left after about 100 years as conference mates.
Now, they are your problem.
Posted on 5/7/15 at 8:15 pm to texashorn
holy shite 
Posted on 5/7/15 at 8:18 pm to texashorn
quote:
texashorn
Posted on 5/7/15 at 8:19 pm to texashorn
quote:
whom they left after about 100 years as conference mates.
Posted on 5/7/15 at 8:21 pm to texashorn
"We're going to have good years again. Our bad years are not that bad. Take a school like Missouri. Our bad years are better than their good years. But we've created a standard."
Deloss Dodds Texas AD 2013
This post was edited on 5/7/15 at 8:24 pm
Posted on 5/7/15 at 8:28 pm to texashorn
quote:
Texas brethren, whom they left after about 100 years as conference mates.
adios, mother frickers
Posted on 5/7/15 at 8:29 pm to texashorn
Nope. Texas was the problem.
Missouri didn't get jilted by the Big 10, it refused to be paid probationary money that the Nebbies were quick to snatch up.
That said, why did Nebraska, Colorado, A&M, and Missouri all leave? If you act like an a-hole, smell like an a-hole, and everyone says you're an a-hole, then you're probably an a-hole.
Missouri didn't get jilted by the Big 10, it refused to be paid probationary money that the Nebbies were quick to snatch up.
That said, why did Nebraska, Colorado, A&M, and Missouri all leave? If you act like an a-hole, smell like an a-hole, and everyone says you're an a-hole, then you're probably an a-hole.
Posted on 5/7/15 at 8:31 pm to throwingoranges
quote:
That said, why did Nebraska, Colorado, A&M, and Missouri all leave? If you act like an a-hole, smell like an a-hole, and everyone says you're an a-hole, then you're probably an a-hole.
Only reason I would ever support Missouri leaving the SEC is if they fricked up and added Texas.
Posted on 5/7/15 at 8:35 pm to NGATiger
Because Mizzou does't have the little-bro syndrome that aTm has.
Posted on 5/7/15 at 8:35 pm to DBU
quote:
Because Mizzou does't have the little-bro syndrome that aTm has.
:flagship:
Posted on 5/7/15 at 8:36 pm to Papplesbeast
quote:
quote:
Because Mizzou rarely ever had any success in the Big 12 and were able to win the SEC East the last two seasons while going 1-10 against conference teams with a winning record.
Mizzou has lost 4 conference games in the last two seasons (including the SECCG). How do you get from 4 losses to 1-10? Is that Common Core math?
It's why when counting wins Nebraskan's can't get past 10
Page 2 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News