Started By
Message
re: Why do Mizzou fans have so much less animosity toward the Big12 than Ags?
Posted on 5/8/15 at 9:29 pm to texashorn
Posted on 5/8/15 at 9:29 pm to texashorn
At A&M, chancellors and university presidents make key decisions. In clown show-U at Austin, athletic directors try to and frick up miserably.
You're just pissed that Byrne was neutered. After all, he was your greatest asset within A&M.
You're just pissed that Byrne was neutered. After all, he was your greatest asset within A&M.
Posted on 5/8/15 at 9:30 pm to texashorn
I would say something about how you wouldn't find me on a big 12 board trying to talk shite about a school that doesn't even consider us to be a rival, but there isn't even a big 12 board for me to go to. How pathetic is that?
This post was edited on 5/8/15 at 9:31 pm
Posted on 5/8/15 at 9:33 pm to WestCoastAg
Thank god for that SEC skirt to hide under, right?
Perhaps I should add on the "borrowing traditions from others" thread how the Aggies are trying to inflate their less-than-winning tradition by affiliating with the SEC. You must be so proud.
Perhaps I should add on the "borrowing traditions from others" thread how the Aggies are trying to inflate their less-than-winning tradition by affiliating with the SEC. You must be so proud.
This post was edited on 5/8/15 at 9:34 pm
Posted on 5/8/15 at 9:36 pm to texashorn
You just inadvertently validated our point.
Instead of striving to get to the upper tier of mediocrity (Texas), we strive for the upper tier (Alabama, Auburn, Florida, LSU).
Instead of striving to get to the upper tier of mediocrity (Texas), we strive for the upper tier (Alabama, Auburn, Florida, LSU).
This post was edited on 5/8/15 at 9:36 pm
Posted on 5/8/15 at 9:39 pm to texashorn
Ah, here comes that inevitable history rewrite with the accompanying burned orange spin.
I guess it didn't occur to you that this is an SEC board, the question was posed to Mizzou and Texas A&M fans, and you are none of the above. I'll address some of your bullcrap rewrite, but then you should go to TexAgs if you want to voice your realignment opinions.
That play was not reviewable by rule unless it fell under Article 6, egregious error.
Problem is, if your team is in FG range with seconds left, and you run a passing play, then scramble, and then the try to throw the ball out of play, and the clock shows 0.00 there is no 'egregious error'. There was no reason to suppose time didn't run out. Certainly nothing egregious, as the announcers couldn't agree if time expired, or if there was 0.2 or 0.3 on the clock even watching in slow motion as the ball hit a chair on the sideline. The whole fiasco was pulled out of the refs' asses.
I don't care to address the other lies and half truths you've spouted above.
You are an incredibly BAD partner to have in a conference, period, and everybody knows it. You will NEVER play in the SEC, you were rejected by B1G, then the ACC and then the PAC again.
Nobody here cares about your opinionated spin, so stop following your Daddy Texas A&M around like some needy red headed stepbrother. It's raining money on the SEC, and very soon Vanderbilt will be hiring anybody they want off your staff.
You got played by Texas A&M, and the entire football community knows it. Your sub .500 team was destroyed and humiliated by the last place team I'm the SEC West.. in a game played in Texas. You have no serviceable QB and a PATHETIC offensive line, which allowed your stated reliance on the running game to achieve an average 3" per carry v. Arkansas in a blowout that wasn't as close as the score indicated.
Texas A&M is cherry picking recruits who want to play in the best of the Power 4 conferences: the SEC.
Texas A&M is lapping you in recruiting and that trend won't stop anytime soon. You dodged Texas A&M in the 2013 Cotton Bowl, hiding out in a minor bowl and letting OU take your whipping. Now your coach says he doesn't want to play us any time soon. He may appear to be a little smarter than he looks.
I guess it didn't occur to you that this is an SEC board, the question was posed to Mizzou and Texas A&M fans, and you are none of the above. I'll address some of your bullcrap rewrite, but then you should go to TexAgs if you want to voice your realignment opinions.
That play was not reviewable by rule unless it fell under Article 6, egregious error.
Problem is, if your team is in FG range with seconds left, and you run a passing play, then scramble, and then the try to throw the ball out of play, and the clock shows 0.00 there is no 'egregious error'. There was no reason to suppose time didn't run out. Certainly nothing egregious, as the announcers couldn't agree if time expired, or if there was 0.2 or 0.3 on the clock even watching in slow motion as the ball hit a chair on the sideline. The whole fiasco was pulled out of the refs' asses.
I don't care to address the other lies and half truths you've spouted above.
You are an incredibly BAD partner to have in a conference, period, and everybody knows it. You will NEVER play in the SEC, you were rejected by B1G, then the ACC and then the PAC again.
Nobody here cares about your opinionated spin, so stop following your Daddy Texas A&M around like some needy red headed stepbrother. It's raining money on the SEC, and very soon Vanderbilt will be hiring anybody they want off your staff.
You got played by Texas A&M, and the entire football community knows it. Your sub .500 team was destroyed and humiliated by the last place team I'm the SEC West.. in a game played in Texas. You have no serviceable QB and a PATHETIC offensive line, which allowed your stated reliance on the running game to achieve an average 3" per carry v. Arkansas in a blowout that wasn't as close as the score indicated.
Texas A&M is cherry picking recruits who want to play in the best of the Power 4 conferences: the SEC.
Texas A&M is lapping you in recruiting and that trend won't stop anytime soon. You dodged Texas A&M in the 2013 Cotton Bowl, hiding out in a minor bowl and letting OU take your whipping. Now your coach says he doesn't want to play us any time soon. He may appear to be a little smarter than he looks.
Posted on 5/8/15 at 9:44 pm to texashorn
quote:
Thank god for that SEC skirt to hide under, right?
Whorn logic at its finest.
Posted on 5/8/15 at 9:59 pm to 13-0 Branding Iron
Great, now he is on this thread.
This post was edited on 5/8/15 at 10:02 pm
Posted on 5/8/15 at 10:03 pm to throwingoranges
quote:
LOL at Aggies thinking they would have done better than Mizzou in the East.
2014 - Lost at home to Missouri
2013 - Lost to Missouri on the road
2012 - Beat the worst Missouri team in a decade at home
2011 - Lost at home to Missouri
2010 - Lost at home to Missouri
daaaaaaammn
didn't realize the aggies sucked so bad vs mizzou
Posted on 5/8/15 at 10:04 pm to hawgfaninc
8-6 overall.
5-0 before 2002, including 73-0 in 1993
5-0 before 2002, including 73-0 in 1993
Posted on 5/8/15 at 10:05 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
CGSC Lobotomy
^^^^gets so fricking butt hurt about Mizzou. Every freaking time.
Posted on 5/8/15 at 10:10 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
CGSC Lobotomy
Mizzou has been working that Aggie arse.
Posted on 5/8/15 at 10:11 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
including 73-0 in 1993
Hold on to that feeling.
Posted on 5/8/15 at 10:12 pm to the808bass
When I was going through school, Missouri, Oklahoma, and Oklahoma State were doormats. Texas was average, and Texas Tech was the team we had no business losing to, but somehow always lost on a freak play or bad call.
Missouri is Texas Tech with a better overall athletic program and an easier division.
Missouri is Texas Tech with a better overall athletic program and an easier division.
This post was edited on 5/8/15 at 10:13 pm
Posted on 5/8/15 at 10:14 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
Missouri is Texas Tech with a better overall athletic program and an easier division.
Posted on 5/8/15 at 10:15 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Missouri is aTm's daddy and you should address them as such
They've been working that Aggy arse for a while now, and working it in your own backyard.
They've been working that Aggy arse for a while now, and working it in your own backyard.
Posted on 5/8/15 at 10:19 pm to kilo
Well, Missouri and Texas Tech have the same number of outright (0) and shared (1) conference titles in the last 50 years.
Same winning pct. (.000) in title games too.
Same winning pct. (.000) in title games too.
This post was edited on 5/8/15 at 10:21 pm
Posted on 5/8/15 at 10:23 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
I think its hilarious that Mizzou gets you so salty.
Posted on 5/8/15 at 10:25 pm to kilo
Sorry simple facts make you so butthurt.
This post was edited on 5/8/15 at 10:26 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News