| Favorite team: | Texas A&M  |
| Location: | houston |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 1987 |
| Registered on: | 5/30/2013 |
| Online Status: | Online |
Recent Posts
Message
To further complicate matters, despite the FBI apparently waiting 2 (2!) weeks after J6 to request preservation of the data:
The public didn’t learn about this until 2025.
To reiterate (and from a separate document from above), the official response to congress from the cell carriers (“all three major cell carriers”) was that the data was not corrupted.
LINK
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. The public didn’t learn about this until 2025.
To reiterate (and from a separate document from above), the official response to congress from the cell carriers (“all three major cell carriers”) was that the data was not corrupted.
quote:
On January 2, 2025, the Committee on House Administration, Subcommittee on Oversight (Oversight Subcommittee) and the House Committee on Judiciary, Subcommittee on the Administrative State, Regulatory Reform, and Antitrust released a report examining federal law enforcement's investigation into the individual(s) who planted both pipe bombs? According to the report, the Oversight Subcommittee "sent letters to the major cell carriers" to verify D'Antuono's testimony and to "confirm whether they provided corrupted cell tower data to the FBI or whether the FBI contacted the [major] cell carriers to inform them that ... [the] data was corrupted. In response to these letters, all three major cell carriers reportedly indicated that they neither provided corrupted data to the FBI nor recived any notification from the FBI of any issues accessing the data
LINK
0
re: ZeroHedge: Stunning Flood of J6 Fedsurrection Evidence Can't Be Ignored
Posted by G2160 on 11/13/25 at 6:13 pm to beaux duke
Look, if you weren’t consuming garbage news, you’d know this.
But you do consume garbage news, and because it works against “MAGA”, you’re pretty OK with this sort of corruption and going forward you will pretend you’ve never heard of this.
But you do consume garbage news, and because it works against “MAGA”, you’re pretty OK with this sort of corruption and going forward you will pretend you’ve never heard of this.
Quick Refresher on the J6 Pipe Bomber Cell Data
Posted by G2160 on 11/13/25 at 5:54 pm
With all of the discussion about the J6 pipe bomber lately (well, except for in the news circles of the people who need to read this), we need to refresh the conversation on the FBI and it’s cell geofence data.
Steve D’Atuono (of Whitmer fedknapping fame) was director of the FBI Washington Field Office on J6.
He claims that they had the bomber geofenced, but the data became corrupted:
(What an odd thing for D’Antuono to say)
LINK
Cell providers (providers with an s) told congress:
(Pg 4 of 80)
LINK
The House Oversight Committee then asked the FBI to confirm their position of the cell phone data being corrupted from the provider
LINK
To which the FBI never responded.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Steve D’Atuono (of Whitmer fedknapping fame) was director of the FBI Washington Field Office on J6.
He claims that they had the bomber geofenced, but the data became corrupted:
quote:
We did a complete geofence. We have complete data. Not complete, because there’s some data that was corrupted by one of the providers, not purposely by them, right. It just – unusual circumstance that we have corrupt data from one of the providers. I’m not sure – I can’t remember right now which one. But for that day, which is awful because we don’t have that information to search. So could it have been that provider? Yeah, with our luck, you know, with this investigation it probably was, right. So maybe if we did have that – that data wasn’t corrupted – and it wasn’t purposely corrupted. I don’t want any conspiracy theories, right. To my knowledge, it wasn’t corrupted, you know, but that could have been good information that we don’t have, right. So that is painful for us not to have that. So we looked at everything.
quote:
So maybe if we did have that – that data wasn’t corrupted – and it wasn’t purposely corrupted. I don’t want any conspiracy theories, right.
(What an odd thing for D’Antuono to say)
LINK
Cell providers (providers with an s) told congress:
quote:
the major cell carriers confirmed that they did not provide corrupted data to the FBI and that the FBI never notified them of any issues with accessing the cellular data.
(Pg 4 of 80)
LINK
The House Oversight Committee then asked the FBI to confirm their position of the cell phone data being corrupted from the provider
quote:
I, therefore, ask that you respond in writing to the following questions: 1. Did the FBI receive corrupted or otherwise unusable cellular data returns from one or more of the cell carriers in connection with the investigation into the individual who planted two explosive devices at the RNC and DNC on the evening of January 5, 2021? a. If so, which cell carriers) provided corrupted data to the FBI? b. If so, how was the cellular data transmitted to the FBI? (Drop Box, Hard Drive, file transfer, etc.) c. If so, was any third-party entity involved in transmitting the cellular data to the FBI? 2. If the FBI received corrupted or otherwise unusable cellular data returns, did the FBI inform the cell carrier(s) that provided corrupted data that the data they provided was corrupted or otherwise unusable? a. If so, did the FBI make any attempt to obtain an uncorrupted or otherwise usable version of the data? Please describe in writing the efforts made to retrieve an uncorrupted version of the data.
LINK
To which the FBI never responded.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
re: ZeroHedge: Stunning Flood of J6 Fedsurrection Evidence Can't Be Ignored
Posted by G2160 on 11/13/25 at 5:36 pm to beaux duke
Glad you’re back, despite ignoring my previous post.
You’re probably wondering (well, a smarter person or someone who wanted to be informed would be) if Loudermilk, etc…ever tried to resolve this discrepancy with the FBI.
As it turns out, they did. And the FBI never responded.
LINK
You’re probably wondering (well, a smarter person or someone who wanted to be informed would be) if Loudermilk, etc…ever tried to resolve this discrepancy with the FBI.
As it turns out, they did. And the FBI never responded.
LINK
re: ZeroHedge: Stunning Flood of J6 Fedsurrection Evidence Can't Be Ignored
Posted by G2160 on 11/13/25 at 5:10 pm to beaux duke
You are wrong again
LINK
Page 4 of 80 from the House Oversight Committee Report on the pipe bombs:
LINK
Page 4 of 80 from the House Oversight Committee Report on the pipe bombs:
quote:
the major cell carriers confirmed that they did not provide corrupted data to the FBI and that the FBI never notified them of any issues with accessing the cellular data.
re: ZeroHedge: Stunning Flood of J6 Fedsurrection Evidence Can't Be Ignored
Posted by G2160 on 11/13/25 at 4:59 pm to beaux duke
My source is congress.
Yours is CNN, which is why you didn’t know any of this.
Yours is CNN, which is why you didn’t know any of this.
re: ZeroHedge: Stunning Flood of J6 Fedsurrection Evidence Can't Be Ignored
Posted by G2160 on 11/13/25 at 4:51 pm to beaux duke
quote:
and you know this for a fact how? or are you just regurgitating talking points? hint - the latter
It’s apparent that you don’t know what you are talking about.
Here is the then FBI director of the Washington Field Office on the corruption of the phone data
LINK
quote:
We did a complete geofence. We have complete data. Not complete, because there’s some data that was corrupted by one of the providers, not purposely by them, right. It just – unusual circumstance that we have corrupt data from one of the providers. I’m not sure – I can’t remember right now which one. But for that day, which is awful because we don’t have that information to search. So could it have been that provider? Yeah, with our luck, you know, with this investigation it probably was, right. So maybe if we did have that – that data wasn’t corrupted – and it wasn’t purposely corrupted. I don’t want any conspiracy theories, right. To my knowledge, it wasn’t corrupted, you know, but that could have been good information that we don’t have, right. So that is painful for us not to have that. So we looked at everything.
The cell providers told congress they not provide corrupted data to the FBI. It had to have become corrupted after being in the FBI’s possession, and the FBI did not request new uncorrupted data.
LINK
Here is the story about the camera footage
LINK
re: ZeroHedge: Stunning Flood of J6 Fedsurrection Evidence Can't Be Ignored
Posted by G2160 on 11/13/25 at 4:22 pm to beaux duke
quote:
because people that take the time to plan out crimes do their best to not get caught? this isn't an episode of csi:mandeville. one of my best pals is retired fbi. he worked bank robberies. said the guys who just knock one over bc they need dope money are an easy catch. the ones who put in the work are very difficult
You missed the most important part: have the FBI allow your phone location data to become corrupted while in the FBI’s possession, allow the frame rates of the cameras documenting the area to be chopped, and stonewall the investigation for years.
The audacity of suggesting that viable explosives were placed in a very open and visible location at the DNC while the 2nd-in-command-elect was there with an SS detail, and not being able to make progress on this case in four years…is laughable.
re: ANTIFA has been designated as a foreign terrorist organization
Posted by G2160 on 11/13/25 at 3:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
A small % engages in violence that I doubt you can directly trace back to any foreign influence directly You know what this sounds like? Most political movements on Earth, including plenty on the American right, including many MAGA-related organizations
Please list the most recent Maga-related organizations that have been engaging in violence.
re: J6 pipe bomb suspect identified. Full report linked.
Posted by G2160 on 11/13/25 at 2:12 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
It seems as if Bongino via Julie Kelly is backing off of the Blaze theories...
How did you come to this conclusion based on the tweet you cited, which has nothing to do with Bongino? JK has always been aligned with Bongino and she never accepted the Blaze theories.
re: Bongino says Massie is ‘a dog barking behind a fence’
Posted by G2160 on 11/13/25 at 12:22 pm to Sassafrasology
quote:
It would be nice if Bongino started putting some skins on the wall instead of free beer tomorrow.
People are rightfully getting impatient because the longer this goes on, the more it looks like they’re going to get away with it.
It’s time for arrests, or naming names of those who are covering this up.
Why was D’antuono allowed to bullshite congress about the geofencing phone data? What's the latest on the investigation?
re: What is the rationale for not wanting the files released?
Posted by G2160 on 11/13/25 at 11:29 am to DavidTheGnome
I’m not saying they should or shouldn’t be released, but the files like Epstein emails which aren’t necessarily factually accurate (by intention or not), will be manipulated to fabricate misleading and untrue narratives.
This has already happened.
This has already happened.
re: So..if Trump is truly in the Epstein files in a bad way (he is not)...
Posted by G2160 on 11/13/25 at 9:31 am to Bama Mountain
Why are democrats already redacting known information to create bad faith misrepresentations of the few documents that came out yesterday?
re: So..if Trump is truly in the Epstein files in a bad way (he is not)...
Posted by G2160 on 11/13/25 at 7:52 am to Bama Mountain
When are you going to address this?
Why did democrats do this?
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Why did democrats do this?
re: So..if Trump is truly in the Epstein files in a bad way (he is not)...
Posted by G2160 on 11/13/25 at 7:18 am to Bama Mountain
quote:
Trump ran on the Epstein files. He, and his loyal followers, talked about it endlessly.......Suddenly it is a nothingburger. Why?
Because you are already bastardizing the intent.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Why?
When are you going to address this?
re: Trump called Boebert to ask her to take her name off petition to release Epstein Files.
Posted by G2160 on 11/12/25 at 4:50 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I have no idea why Trump is fighting this losing political battle
Probably because this won’t lead to criminal charges or justice for anyone, but will give the left years of political capital where anything mentioning trump (and only trump) can and will be spun up into allegations of criminal wrongdoing.
re: J6 pipe bomb suspect identified. Full report linked.
Posted by G2160 on 11/12/25 at 3:34 pm to IvoryBillMatt
It should also be noted that the cell providers confirmed that they did not send corrupted data and that the fbi didn’t request additional data from them.
re: J6 pipe bomb suspect identified. Full report linked.
Posted by G2160 on 11/12/25 at 3:15 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
It's impossible that these were just mistakes.
Correct
His statement is on page 3 here
LINK
He said it wasn’t purposely corrupted and he didn’t want any conspiracy theories to come from this, though:
quote:
We did a complete geofence. We have complete data. Not complete, because there’s some data that was corrupted by one of the providers, not purposely by them, right. It just – unusual circumstance that we have corrupt data from one of the providers. I’m not sure – I can’t remember right now which one. But for that day, which is awful because we don’t have that information to search. So could it have been that provider? Yeah, with our luck, you know, with this investigation it probably was, right. So maybe if we did have that – that data wasn’t corrupted – and it wasn’t purposely corrupted. I don’t want any conspiracy theories, right. To my knowledge, it wasn’t corrupted, you know, but that could have been good information that we don’t have, right. So that is painful for us not to have that. So we looked at everything.
D’antuono was already either deposed or questioned in front of some committee years ago.
That’s how we learned that the cell phone geofencing data had become “corrupted”.
That’s how we learned that the cell phone geofencing data had become “corrupted”.
Popular
20
