Favorite team:Texas A&M 
Location:houston
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:2251
Registered on:5/30/2013
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
The acronym is now AWFU[rban]L
quote:

How does this not apply to the 215 who just voted against Republican principles (states rights)?


Finding fraud in something provided by Gravis isn’t actionable.
This type of activity is actually necessary to preserve democracy…
Of course it’s happening, and here’s why it’s a good thing…
I’ll say it again: they are going to use the constitution to shield themselves while they destroy the country. The constitution was never intended to be a device that can save the country from people with bad intentions. The founding fathers were clear about this. People like SFP and this:

quote:

Which clause of the US Constitution are you referring to?


Are happy to watch it happen as long as they can puff out their chest about being in accordance with the constitution.
quote:

You'd need 22 points, so at some point you have to go for two regardless. They get the first TD and don't get the two. Now its 16 points, they still would have to score two more touchdowns either way just tried to get the needed two point conversation out the way, ultimately doesn't matter though


I suppose it would be nice to have it out of the way, but if you wait until the end you only have to get it once. If you fail early you have to get it twice or the game is over.
Whyd NE go for 2?

They need 2 more TDs either way, now they need 2 more 2-pts too
Believe this is saying that CA is going to calculate the taxes off of 8/365 x annual compensation, which will wipe out any flat fee pool money he’s going to get.
quote:

Give Trump Georgia. What does it change? Nothing.


Are you asking what finding systemic fraud and coverup facilitated by the government would change?

quote:

have spoken with tons of neighbors and coworkers who have told me point blank that they voted for Trump in 2016 and then in 2020 they either didn't vote or voted for Biden.


“I’m a 3x trump voter…BUT…”
:lol:
Wasn’t much of the doge effort stonewalled by judges, attorneys, and politicians connected to NGOs/similar orgs and the handouts that were being scrutinized?

re: No one is illegal on stolen land…

Posted by G2160 on 2/1/26 at 9:49 pm to
It’s hilarious that you were moved by this meaningless feel-good faggotry enough to post this here.

We’re making the rules now, Tonto.
They’re going to win in the long run because of demographics.

They will continue to open borders and allow in more people (who will either vote directly or create generations that will vote for taxpayer-funded benefits, “free” healthcare, etc…) than can be removed in 4 or 8 year terms.

There is no turning this tide:
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
quote:

Im done Jake. You showed me you agree with abusing the law to get results. Thanks man.


If this case was the trump admin on offense, he’d have a list reasons why it was abuse of the intent of the law or lawfare

:lol:
quote:

Who knew illegals could be so profitable?


Democrat politicians and NGOs?
quote:

What does a bunch of people here legally (most being citizens) have to do with discussing efficient policy on detailing illegal immigrants?


Because they’re a 3rd world welfare class that is here for no other reason than we give them money and benefits. And that is the future of what are currently illegals if you allow this to continue.

But I’m also curious as to which other laws you think states should be able to tell the feds to pound sand on?
quote:

Not very rapidly, based on the data everywhere else.


There were virtually no Somalis in Minnesota 30 years ago. Today there are enough to participate in a fraud ring costing taxpayers 10s to 100s of billions. And that’s just one nationality and one type of outflow of funds.

There is also the matter of the one thing you don’t do when handling radicals is let them dictate terms.
They are.

That’s why ICE Is there. MN has created an environment that harbors illegals.

And guess what else: as soon as MN shows the feds how things are going to be done, these illegals are going to be voting in large numbers out the open. And you can add the other states I referenced, too.
quote:

We literally have the data. We are wrecking shop in red areas that cooperate in real time, compared to places like MN.


So what? You think these people won’t just move to MN or other states with similar politics that are watching (CA, WA, OR, NY, MA, ME, IL, CO) and learning that digging their heels in will just make the government stop enforcement? Do you think it stops here in Minnesota? Do communists EVER say “you know what, that’s enough power”?

You went on half cocked on your dumbass ”rational plan” and now you’re trying to back in to justification for it.

The right rolling over for decades because it was perceived as too hard or too mean to fight is exactly why in 2026 minnesota thinks they can tell the feds the law can’t be enforced and why “moderates” like yourself are encouraging that narrative.