Started By
Message

re: Whose decline surprised you more, Arkansas or Tennessee?

Posted on 9/12/20 at 8:47 am to
Posted by Arksulli
Fayetteville
Member since Aug 2014
25197 posts
Posted on 9/12/20 at 8:47 am to
quote:

Vols will be back Hogs won’t




*pat pat*

Who could argue with such a strong and well thought out post? Truly the depth of your football acumen is overwhelming.
Posted by geauxcoco
Greenville, SC
Member since Apr 2007
11024 posts
Posted on 9/12/20 at 8:55 am to
LSU....oh wait
Posted by dirty bastard
Delacroix, Georgia
Member since Aug 2020
2125 posts
Posted on 9/12/20 at 8:58 am to
Neither, rather I've always been surprised that UT has always had a strong team til now with their high school sports being like Pee Wee league compared to other states in the SEC.
Posted by Tjtennispro
ATL
Member since Feb 2018
262 posts
Posted on 9/12/20 at 11:18 am to
I’m from Nashville and hate Tennessee but from 1981-2000 before I went off to Auburn Tennessee was fricking awesome at football. They absolutely owned Georgia and was potentially the best team in the SEC during that timeframe.
Posted by redeye
Member since Aug 2013
8598 posts
Posted on 9/12/20 at 11:20 am to
quote:

Texas who was up there with Bama as far as nationally dominant programs


Alabama was 0-7-1 against Texas and didn't get their first win until the 2009 BCS Championship game.

Arkansas has been a decades long decline. We would have challenged for SEC titles yearly from 1960-1989, but we hit rock bottom in 1990. We've had some good teams since, but haven't been able to sustain any lasting success.

The biggest difference today, imo, is that Tennessee still recruits great players and has no good reason to struggle so much. If Arkansas still recruited that well, we'd be much better.
Posted by dchog
Pea ridge
Member since Nov 2012
21261 posts
Posted on 9/12/20 at 12:28 pm to
The players that Tennessee recruited aren't that great or else they wouldn't decline like they did.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68510 posts
Posted on 9/12/20 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

The Kiffin crap really hurt them.
If Kiffin never leaves, I think their talent sky rockets and he's a good enough coach that he would win the East a few times. Especially the years that Mizzou won it
Posted by redeye
Member since Aug 2013
8598 posts
Posted on 9/12/20 at 1:32 pm to
Maybe

But while a top-20 class is one of our best, it's just normal for Tennessee and maybe even disappointing. Of course it's easier to recruit well when every SEC writer claims you're a sleeping giant, rather than denying your past success, as they've always done with Arkansas.
Posted by sand mountainDvalues
Member since Oct 2018
8718 posts
Posted on 9/12/20 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

The players that Tennessee recruited aren't that great or else they wouldn't decline like they did.



If we had any other coach in 2015 and 2016, we likely go 11-1 both years.

Talent fell way off after that but those teams were stacked
Posted by dchog
Pea ridge
Member since Nov 2012
21261 posts
Posted on 9/12/20 at 1:37 pm to
Nutt should have won more games in 98,99,02,03,05,06 and 07. He should had at least brought an SEC title back to Fayetteville.

Nutt on his best days were average. He won on raw talent and didn't develop his players.
This post was edited on 9/12/20 at 1:41 pm
Posted by dchog
Pea ridge
Member since Nov 2012
21261 posts
Posted on 9/12/20 at 2:53 pm to
I don't need to look at recruiting rankings to see if teams like Tennessee are any good or not. They were a top program in the 90s but they declined when coaching became a problem. It got bad to the point that they just recently had no player drafted to the NFL. Arkansas had at least one player drafted to the NFL for the last 25 years. That doesn't mean Arkansas were better but it just explains that Tennessee were not as talented as people thought.

I'll take trust in more college and NFL coaches than some recruiting sites that are nothing more than hype and not actual player evaluations.

Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
27298 posts
Posted on 9/12/20 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

but from 1991-2001 before I went off to Auburn Tennessee was fricking awesome at football.


FIFY.They had some good teams in the 80's but awesome is idiotic.

They were 1-3 vs UGA in the 80's BTW
Posted by TheJimBrown7
Member since Mar 2017
663 posts
Posted on 9/12/20 at 3:00 pm to
Decline implies you were once a great program. Arkansas has had 3 good seasons since they joined the conference 30 years ago.
Posted by memphis tiger
Memphis, TN
Member since Feb 2006
20720 posts
Posted on 9/12/20 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

Message
Whose decline surprised you more, Arkansas or Tennessee


Is this really a question???
The only surprising thing is that Arkansas had a good run when Petrino was there.

Historically, especially since joining the SEC Arkansas has been an also ran.
Posted by memphis tiger
Memphis, TN
Member since Feb 2006
20720 posts
Posted on 9/12/20 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

Texas who was up there with Bama as far as nationally dominant programs


I’d argue that given their resources and recruiting ground, Texas has been a huge historic underachiever. I think the only other major school with similar advantages that has done less is UCLA
Posted by OleManDixon
Lexington
Member since Jan 2018
9234 posts
Posted on 9/12/20 at 4:54 pm to
The decline in trolling.
Posted by Tiger Phil
I see burnt orange everywhere
Member since Nov 2007
1585 posts
Posted on 9/12/20 at 5:00 pm to
quote:


Fun fact:

Tennessee football is a combined 33-15 all time vs LSU and Arkansas.

Roughly half of both LSU's all time wins (5) and Arkansas's all time wins (3) have come against Tenner during their lowest point in history. Or roughly the past 15 years. It's the equivalent of making fun of LSU during the 80s and 90s or Arkansas since inception.


This is a surprising fact, so I actually looked it up. LSU is all-time 10-20-3 vs Tennessee.

However, the series is tied 9-9-1 since 1967. So congrats on being dominant over LSU in a completely different era.
Posted by WestRockyTop
West Tennessee
Member since Dec 2019
7209 posts
Posted on 9/12/20 at 6:13 pm to
Tennessee had the bigest decline.

From 97-07 we played in the SEC championship 5 times.
LSU kicked our butts twice during that time. 2001 knocked us out of the Rose Bowl....if my memory serves me right. Matt Mauck came off the bench and kick out arise. What a fun game to watch. LSU beat us in 2007 also.
Auburn whhpped us once.
We got greedy and fired Fulmer in 2008 and then hired:
Kiffen, Dooley.Butch Jones, and a couple of dumb airse ADs. Not a good combination.
Pruitt is on the right track. We will get blistered this year but we are a couple years out from competing in the SEC Championship.
Posted by MizzouTrue
Member since Jun 2016
3841 posts
Posted on 9/13/20 at 7:04 am to
The SWC was indeed a power conference. But Texas, SMU, and A&M from 1975-1990 is far less intimidating than Alabama, LSU, Tennessee, Georgia, or Nebraska and OU in the same time period
Posted by dchog
Pea ridge
Member since Nov 2012
21261 posts
Posted on 9/13/20 at 10:28 am to
Texas, Texas A&M and SMU from that era were a combined 17-11 against SEC opponents including the bowls. That is a far cry that they were such inferior to the SEC.

Alabama was 0-7 against Texas before the 09 title game.
Page 1 2 3
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter