Started By
Message
re: Who do you think would've won in 2003 between LSU and USC?
Posted on 8/23/26 at 8:59 pm to Nado Jenkins83
Posted on 8/23/26 at 8:59 pm to Nado Jenkins83
"I'm not mad, you're mad!" 
Posted on 8/23/26 at 9:10 pm to Nado Jenkins83
Bowl games.
2002 38-17 #3 Iowa
2003 28-14 #4 Michigan
2004 55-19 #2 Oklahoma
2005 38-41 #2 Texas
2006 32-18 #3 Michigan
2007 49-17 #13 Illinois
2008 38-24 #6 Penn State
2002 38-17 #3 Iowa
2003 28-14 #4 Michigan
2004 55-19 #2 Oklahoma
2005 38-41 #2 Texas
2006 32-18 #3 Michigan
2007 49-17 #13 Illinois
2008 38-24 #6 Penn State
Posted on 8/23/26 at 9:16 pm to dchog
So you are counting the years where they paid players? Got it
Posted on 8/23/26 at 9:17 pm to Nado Jenkins83
Well using your logic, LSU had 4 straight losing seasons 2012-2015. Busted.
Posted on 8/23/26 at 9:17 pm to Nado Jenkins83
Just like everyone else.
Posted on 8/23/26 at 9:21 pm to boston vol
quote:
LSU got dominated
The frick we did. Shot ourselves in the foot repeatedly, i.e. the bama excuse for 15 years.
Posted on 8/23/26 at 9:21 pm to GoGators1995
What title we falsely claiming from that era?
Posted on 8/23/26 at 9:31 pm to FlyingTigerBo
Its interesting. Saban was asked this exact question at a Men's Club meeting at the church he attended in Baton Rouge that offseason. He responded that he had recently talked with Don James about that matchup if it had occurred. He said that James thought USC's passing game would have had a really difficult time with LSU's physicality in the secondary, because of how there was little to no press coverage in the Pac 10. Although he didn't specifically say his team would have won, it was clear Saban believed LSU would have won (though obviously you would expect that to be the case). Sad we didn't get to find out.
Posted on 8/23/26 at 9:58 pm to cajunbama
quote:
Posted by cajunbama
USC, easily.
Go figure.
Back to top

0




