Started By
Message
re: which "former glory" SEC team is least likely to ever be relevant again?
Posted on 5/8/19 at 2:36 am to WilliamTaylor21
Posted on 5/8/19 at 2:36 am to WilliamTaylor21
quote:
Dabo isn’t leaving a dynasty for a train wreck.
He is a blue collar, charitable guy.
He inherited a program just slightly ahead on the trash scale as Bama is today, and he did fine.
Fingers crossed, a boy can dream.
0
Posted on 5/8/19 at 6:42 am to UnderDog68
quote:
The series is tied. 23-23-2.
Tenn. has one more SEC title than UGA...13-12.
UGA claims 2 National titles. Tenn. claims 6.
Tennessee has 2 national titles. 1998 and 1951
ncaa.com
Posted on 5/8/19 at 7:02 am to dcbl
Georgia Tech
Posted on 5/8/19 at 8:05 am to vosams
quote:
Aggies
Posted on 5/8/19 at 8:12 am to dcbl
its that damn prison orange.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 9:27 am to AUCE05
quote:
Ole Miss.
This has been speculated by 1972 and confirmed by 92.
Sometimes I feel like Tennessee has a shot again but having 8 losing seasons in the last 15 years is not good at all. That's almost a generation of losing. In some parts of Tennessee that is a generation.
I think Nebraska has only had 3 or 4.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 10:39 am to John Milner
Posted on 5/8/19 at 10:46 am to dcbl
Now that UG has peaked with Kirby Richt, it will be interesting to see how long it will be before they are relevant again. 39 years and counting.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 10:57 am to deltaland
They were awfully good in 2006
Posted on 5/8/19 at 11:21 am to TideHyde
quote:
Alabama will probably fall back into irrelevancy just like they had been in for their entire history prior to Saban.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 11:51 am to dcbl
quote:
Personally, I think the Vols run away with this
Personally I think this a bad answer. There is everything in place for that program to succeed. They have just had a really really bad run of coaching hires (and some bad luck) since they let Fulmer go.
This post was edited on 5/8/19 at 11:52 am
Posted on 5/8/19 at 2:27 pm to UFMatt
quote:
Now that UG has peaked with Kirby Richt, it will be interesting to see how long it will be before they are relevant again. 39 years and counting.
Do you think MuLLen can keep it within 2 touchdowns this year?
Posted on 5/8/19 at 2:50 pm to atlanta917
quote:
Do you think MuLLen can keep it within 2 touchdowns this year?
Be afraid leg humper, very afraid.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 2:51 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
Tennessee has 2 national titles. 1998 and 1951
ncaa.com
UT has 7 national titles
NCAA Records
Hell, judging by that list Alabama has 22 national titles. By my count it's 16.
Let me guess. I didn't check Auburn, but I bet the reason you like that list is because it shows more than the 2 Auburn actually won.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 3:02 pm to John Milner
It has 5 for Auburn. They don't claim 1913, 1983, and 1993.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 3:08 pm to John Milner
quote:
, but I bet the reason you like that list is because it shows more than the 2 Auburn actually won.
I like the list because it shows the polls. The NCAA does not decide a NC in football, so your previous link was incomplete
And an Alabama fan probably shouldnt be shite talking about picking sources for better NC claims....
Posted on 5/8/19 at 3:10 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
I like the list because it shows the polls. The NCAA does not decide a NC in football, so your previous link was incomplete
And an Alabama fan probably shouldnt be shite talking about picking sources for better NC claims....
Not all of those are polls. The majority are mathematical formula ranking developed by individuals.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 3:15 pm to Korin
quote:
Not all of those are polls. The majority are mathematical formula ranking developed by individuals.
They are referred to as polls in CFB. The BCS is a mathematical formula, but referred to as a poll
Posted on 5/8/19 at 3:59 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
They are referred to as polls in CFB.
Not in the actual records book you linked. Hit up page 108.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 4:04 pm to dcbl
Tulane.
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News