Started By
Message
re: which "former glory" SEC team is least likely to ever be relevant again?
Posted on 5/8/19 at 4:08 pm to Korin
Posted on 5/8/19 at 4:08 pm to Korin
quote:
Not in the actual records book you linked. Hit up page 108.
quote:
NATIONAL POLL RANKINGS.......................................................108
quote:
NATIONAL POLL RANKINGS
quote:
s historical list of poll selectors is that the poll be national in scope
quote:
Poll Systems History
quote:
FINAL NATIONAL POLL LEADERS
Not sure if serious...
This post was edited on 5/8/19 at 4:09 pm
1
Posted on 5/8/19 at 4:16 pm to atlanta917
quote:
you think MuLLen can keep it within 2 touchdowns this year?
No way the human emoji korin will answer this question
Posted on 5/8/19 at 4:23 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
Not sure if serious...
Look under Selection Format. It says either Math, Poll, or Research. I'm not doing the work for you.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 4:26 pm to Korin
quote:good lord man. The title to the section is poll. It refers them all as polls numerous times. Are denying that?
Look under Selection Format. It says either Math, Poll, or Research. I'm not doing the work for you.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 4:27 pm to NYCAuburn
Shame on me for thinking you weren't trolling as usual.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 4:29 pm to Korin
So are denying that the ncaa refers to them all as polls? frick even most election polls are mathematical calculations.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 6:34 pm to NYCAuburn
The more reasonable list is that one from ncaa.com that I linked before ncaa.com
It lists 15 for Alabama, rather than the 22 in the other. It lists 2 for UT and Auburn.
Personally, I'm good with just listing titles since 1936, when the legitimate news polls cranked up.
It lists 15 for Alabama, rather than the 22 in the other. It lists 2 for UT and Auburn.
Personally, I'm good with just listing titles since 1936, when the legitimate news polls cranked up.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 6:36 pm to John Milner
Vol fans don't like that site at all.
I wish it started with 1936 though and the AP because any poll before then was conducted retroactively. For example, the NCF (National Championship Foundation) didn't even exist until 1980.
I wish it started with 1936 though and the AP because any poll before then was conducted retroactively. For example, the NCF (National Championship Foundation) didn't even exist until 1980.
This post was edited on 5/8/19 at 6:38 pm
Posted on 5/8/19 at 6:37 pm to Korin
quote:
Vol fans don't like that site at all.
Neither do Auburn fans.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 6:38 pm to John Milner
quote:
Neither do Auburn fans.
Why? They claim 2 and both are listed. Meanwhile, only 2 of UTV's claims are listed.
UG fans hate it too. No 1942 since they claimed it over 40 years later.
This post was edited on 5/8/19 at 6:39 pm
Posted on 5/8/19 at 6:50 pm to dcbl
The correct answer is Florida.
10-3. Nice. Still finished #3 in the East. Mullen’s proving himself a mediocre recruiter. Look for Franks & the RBs to regress behind this year’s inexperienced OL. So it’s not happening for the 3 or 4 loss Gators in 2019.
And that’s the new normal with Mullen at the helm. The mouth of Spurrier, the trophy case of Muschamp.
10-3. Nice. Still finished #3 in the East. Mullen’s proving himself a mediocre recruiter. Look for Franks & the RBs to regress behind this year’s inexperienced OL. So it’s not happening for the 3 or 4 loss Gators in 2019.
And that’s the new normal with Mullen at the helm. The mouth of Spurrier, the trophy case of Muschamp.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 6:54 pm to CalDawg
UF isn't going away. They'll win their division more often in the next 20,25, pick a number, than any other East team.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 7:01 pm to John Milner
Yet another UG alter.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 7:10 pm to TideHyde
Wow. You are stupid.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 7:13 pm to Reservoir dawg
quote:
Arkansas has had many great seasons, but they haven't always been in the SEC West either.
Wrong. Arkansas is a charter member of the SEC West.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 7:41 pm to vosams
WINNER BY A COUNTRY MILE.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 8:18 pm to John Milner
quote:
The more reasonable list is that one from ncaa.com that I linked before ncaa.com
It lists 15 for Alabama, rather than the 22 in the other. It lists 2 for UT and Auburn.
Personally, I'm good with just listing titles since 1936, when the legitimate news polls cranked up.
You may be good with it but, it's no good. Who are you to decide Alabama's '25, for instance, NC was invalid?
Just as football didn't start yesterday, football was played before polls were created and certain teams were acknowledged as having been the best.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 8:43 pm to TideHyde
quote:
Who are you to decide Alabama's '25, for instance, NC was invalid?
Do you have a link to me saying 1925 wasn't legitimate?
I said I would be ok with counting only the polls. Why? Because they are generally considered more legitimate than many of the others.
It's not even an important argument. Alabama has more national titles, at least since the 19th century, regardless how you count them.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 9:06 pm to TideHyde
quote:
As soon as Saban retires, Alabama will probably fall back into irrelevancy just like they had been in for their entire history prior to Saban.
Either this is sarcasm or you started watching football in 2007.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 9:19 pm to dcbl
10RC. Phat Phil has brought a curse to the program with his backstabbing and deceit fullness.
Vowels are cursed for eons.
Vowels are cursed for eons.
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News