atlanta917

[quote]With what offense exactly? You're averaging 26 points against SEC teams. You really think that's enough to stop LSU which is averaging 46 in conference play? [/quote] Realistically UGA’s only shot is to shorten the game with the ground game and long sustained drives, keeping burrow and the...

[quote]Why would anyone melt if Georgia beats LSU in a close game and LSU goes at number 4?[/quote] Idk, because they don’t like LSU? Lsu fans gave bama shite for back dooring to the playoffs and I’d assume the same would be true if LSU did. Would also imagine the board would implode if LSU lost, t...

[quote]Insecure means playing a team you're afraid of losing to. Because you're insecure.[/quote] I was going for more of a being unable to admit other teams are good because you’d freak out if you weren’t the best at something. Like when bama fans would insert their team into any discussion about ...

[quote]I hear you. A big problem with AU, other than being transitive, is the field conditions. It had rained 2.5 days straight before the game, including that morning. The field was sloppy. Players on both side were slipping. Hell, that could of even helped LSU more. Probably not, but it could have...

I have family that lives next to the stadium. My uncle and cousin actually weld those obnoxious cowbells. ...

Probably, but that’s not the question....

[quote]imagine if UGA didn't lose him[/quote] Do you really think fields would be putting up the same numbers in UGA’s offense? ...

[quote]If you don't call Georgia's defense elite, whose is [/quote] I do think UGA’s defense is elite. I just think LSU’s offense is more elite. I think LSU will still be able to score on a great UGA defense....

[quote]Finally a reasonable answer. If holding each team under their average is in fact true, thats definitely a valid argument... not the AU transitive crap.[/quote] The auburn game was just a common opponent and I agree transitive property means nothing. I honestly have no idea how many points LS...

[quote]I don’t think anyone disagrees with this [/quote] OP has over a 100 down votes for saying fields should be considered, so it seems at least a few do. Technically the second and third place vote getters are considered, so it’s not like they said fields should win over burrow. ...

[quote]exactly! these clowns cant even understand what the fricking debate is. [/quote] UGA does have a great defense because they hold their opponents below their season averages in rushing and passing. I agree holding a bad offense to low scoring isn’t impressive but if a team averages 200 yards ...

[quote]That's a good point. UGA was one bad Nix throw to an open receiver away from a tie game with AU.[/quote] And UGA was a dropped int away from it never being a game. Those are the breaks. Stokes dropped a gift int on the first touchdown. ...

[quote]Total offense: 43 ND 59 UF 101 USC [/quote] That’s what I thought. Either way, there’s no way to answer your post without using transitive property and LSU/UGA fans view it differently. I think UGA will hold LSU’s offense below its average, but even that should be enough to outscore UGA. ...

[quote]you dont need to. I know all about how thugu stopping a bunch of mediocre (at best) offenses (save usc) doesn't equate to being able to stop a top 2 offense in the country. except loltransitive ftw[/quote] First, that’s not how S&P+ works. Second, I agree transitive property is a bad metri...

[quote]transitive on EVERY sentence [/quote] Thats literally all we have for OP’s question given that LSU and UGA haven’t played yet. Just transitive property and speculation. ...

[quote]almost let a pitiful Bo Nix beat him. [/quote] Nix was closer to beating LSU and will probably beat bama. [quote]The qbs he gave up for Fromm is the biggest head-scratcher.[/quote] Fromm took a team to a natty. What has Eason done? Kirby got to a natty in 2 years. How long did it take Saban...

[quote]You getting a job[/quote] Nice one, boomer. ...

[quote]still waiting on the list of powerful offenses that thuga has stopped that validates this claim[/quote] I don’t feel like explaining how S&P+ works for you. ...

[quote]They are now.[/quote] Notre Dame has been above SC all season. Florida may have recently passed them, but I’d assume they’d be a large margin ahead as well. ...

[quote]insult the intelligence of LSU fans.[/quote] Just the sidewalk fans who are incapable of having an honest conversation. [quote]highest ranked offensive opponent you faced, you lost[/quote] Florida and Notre Dame are ranked above South Carolina. [quote]deflect from the SC loss to support you...