Started By
Message

re: Where was the lawsuit against Alabama?

Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:56 pm to
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
53107 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

You think the SEC filed an appeal in the Bediako case?

The SEC was never a named defendent in that case, it was solely between the NCAA and Bediako. The SEC filed an official affadvit in support of the NCAA's position.


So the SEC didn’t even get involved when one of their member institutions rostered and played a former professional player?

Even better. More proof of selective enforcement and failure to maintain competitive balance within their conference.
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 2:57 pm
Posted by paperwasp
2x HRV 2025 Poster of the Year
Member since Sep 2014
31300 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

What am I missing?

This has been answered soooo many times.

Why must we recreate the wheel in every single thread?
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Member since Dec 2019
74627 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

The SEC was never a named defendent in that case, it was solely between the NCAA and Bediako.


Mostly, because the SEC didn't immediately create a rule, as they did in this case.

The rule's orgin is fairly ambiguous; it appears to have existed already but was simply not enforced during the Bediako situation.
Posted by boweswi05
birmingham
Member since Aug 2016
6915 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

Because the courts handled it. But a precedent has been set.


STFU.

You see the biased shite and defending it. frick you too
Posted by cajunbama
Metairie
Member since Jan 2007
35703 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

The SEC filed an official affadvit in support of the NCAA's position.



But the average LSU fan thinks that means the SEC is being inconsistent because... well just because.


You got politely deal with this type of mass psychosis.

Time to put them out.
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Member since Dec 2019
74627 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

This has been answered soooo many times.

Why must we recreate the wheel in every single thread?


I personally haven't received any type of logical rebuttal. Just a lot of deflection.
Posted by Lgrnwd
Member since Jan 2018
8872 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

The SEC was never a named defendent in that case, it was solely between the NCAA and Bediako. The SEC filed an official affadvit in support of the NCAA's position.


You are correct. The SEC did not even legally go after Alabama at all. Now all of a sudden they are threatening severe punishment against LSU and filing lawsuits.

Makes the SEC look even more discriminatory and bias.
Posted by LSUtigerNVegas9
Member since Nov 2025
335 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:58 pm to
It proves it’s ok to play them under court order with no penalties. You stated that set the precedent on whether pro players can play. WRONG. Close your cock holster before you look even more like a clown.

Sankey testified under oath that those rules were always in place. His answer for why Bediako was allowed to play was he had a court order.

No different. LSU will play the players until the SEC can get it reversed. And face no penalties for it. Bediako case set precedent. You said it yourself. You just left out the rest of the details of what precedent his case actually set.

Poor Gumps becoming more irrelevant by the day.
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 3:01 pm
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
78505 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

cajunbama


You are way out of your league in this discussion. Go shoplift some PBR.
Posted by Lg
Hayden, Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
8766 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

The mental gymnastics it takes to reason that a guy YEARS removed from college,


I'm not trying to do any gymnastics, but the truth of the matter is there are players that have played for a few years as PROFESSIONALS in Europe that play CBB. Why wasn't Bediako allowed to do the same thing?
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
99082 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

And he was ruled ineligible after 4 or 5 games. Then he was off the team.


So LSU shouldn’t follow the judges orders then is what you’re saying?

Good to know.
Posted by paperwasp
2x HRV 2025 Poster of the Year
Member since Sep 2014
31300 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

It's pretty easy.

Alabama plays a pro basketball player, the SEC takes no action.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


R E T A R D E D
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
41947 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

But apparently, they made a distinction between the pro leagues


There has always been a distinction. Just as there is also a distinction between never playing in college and playing in college and leaving for a pro league.

There are carve outs to allow accomodations for how different parts of the world handle youth sports. Likewise, not all EuroPros are eligible to play in college. There are standards that have to be met in order to retain the ability to play.

quote:

because they ruled against Bediako

They've ruled against Euro players as well. They've been very consistent that you cannot leave college for a pro league and sign with a professional team and come back.
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 3:01 pm
Posted by SidewalkTiger
Member since Dec 2019
74627 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

But apparently, they made a distinction between the pro leagues, because they ruled against Bediako. I'm assuming the same weight of professionalism isn't applied between the NBA / European league and the NFL/CFL. Or maybe it's an agreement between NCAA/NFL/NBA.


The conference didn't, an Alabama judge did.

If not for the judge, Bediako would've played the whole season. The conference protested a bit but took no real action.
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
9786 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 3:01 pm to

Why is the Big10 seemingly having no controversy at all when they have the exact same rule as the SEC?

Posted by SOBMarcus
Boerne TX
Member since Apr 2020
2795 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 3:01 pm to
In your mommas cooter.
Posted by boweswi05
birmingham
Member since Aug 2016
6915 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

But the average LSU fan thinks that means the SEC is being inconsistent because... well just because.


You got politely deal with this type of mass psychosis.

Time to put them out.


STFU you fricking nerd
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
41947 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

So the SEC didn’t even get involved when one of their member institutions rostered and played a former professional player?

Even better. More proof of selective enforcement and failure to maintain competitive balance within their conference.


The delusion is strong with this one.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
53107 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

The delusion is strong with this one.


My bad. Did I miss the lawsuit against Alabama for signing and playing a former pro?
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
41947 posts
Posted on 9/4/26 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

You are correct. The SEC did not even legally go after Alabama at all


Well, legally, they couldn't...

quote:

Now all of a sudden they are threatening severe punishment against LSU and filing lawsuits.


And you don't understand why?

quote:

Makes the SEC look even more discriminatory and bias.

first pageprev pagePage 3 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter